The Big Lie
-
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 18:17 last edited by
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
-
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 18:18 last edited by@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
Some of us believe one is a bigger problem than the other. That does not preclude finding both to be wrong.
-
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
Some of us believe one is a bigger problem than the other. That does not preclude finding both to be wrong.
-
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 18:22 last edited by@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
What did conservatives ever do to you?
-
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 18:29 last edited by Doctor Phibes@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
A second difference is that the violent fanaticism on the left, which in many cases is actually worse than that on the right, was not egged on by a former or current President of the United States.
The fact that people cannot bring themselves to condemn this individual for his cynical exploitation of the gullible, and his frankly childish refusal to accept the inevitable, is pretty close to being tacit approval of the violence that took place in the Capitol.
To call these people 'conservatives' is an insult to a great political tradition.
-
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
A second difference is that the violent fanaticism on the left, which in many cases is actually worse than that on the right, was not egged on by a former or current President of the United States.
The fact that people cannot bring themselves to condemn this individual for his cynical exploitation of the gullible, and his frankly childish refusal to accept the inevitable, is pretty close to being tacit approval of the violence that took place in the Capitol.
To call these people 'conservatives' is an insult to a great political tradition.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 18:34 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
A second difference is that the violent fanaticism on the left, which in many cases is actually worse than that on the right, was not egged on by a former or current President of the United States.
The fact that people cannot bring themselves to condemn this individual is pretty close to being tacit approval of the violence that took place in the Capitol.
To call these people 'conservatives' is an insult to a great political tradition.
Wokeism and anti-racism have absolutely been condoned by current and former presidents. I was particularly dismayed when GWB wrote an essay on systemic racism in the wake of George Floyd. It goes without saying that the Obamas, especially Michelle, are completely on board with the systemic racism narrative.
As for Trump, I think he went too hard on the election theft thing, in service of his inability to admit to losing. Some doofi took that as permission to enter the Capitol, through unguarded, unlocked doors. Trump immediately told them to go home, and immediately made clear that the rule of law must exist. As it does not, to this day, in Portland.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
A second difference is that the violent fanaticism on the left, which in many cases is actually worse than that on the right, was not egged on by a former or current President of the United States.
The fact that people cannot bring themselves to condemn this individual is pretty close to being tacit approval of the violence that took place in the Capitol.
To call these people 'conservatives' is an insult to a great political tradition.
Wokeism and anti-racism have absolutely been condoned by current and former presidents. I was particularly dismayed when GWB wrote an essay on systemic racism in the wake of George Floyd. It goes without saying that the Obamas, especially Michelle, are completely on board with the systemic racism narrative.
As for Trump, I think he went too hard on the election theft thing, in service of his inability to admit to losing. Some doofi took that as permission to enter the Capitol, through unguarded, unlocked doors. Trump immediately told them to go home, and immediately made clear that the rule of law must exist. As it does not, to this day, in Portland.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 18:39 last edited by Doctor Phibes@horace said in The Big Lie:
@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
A second difference is that the violent fanaticism on the left, which in many cases is actually worse than that on the right, was not egged on by a former or current President of the United States.
The fact that people cannot bring themselves to condemn this individual is pretty close to being tacit approval of the violence that took place in the Capitol.
To call these people 'conservatives' is an insult to a great political tradition.
Wokeism and anti-racism have absolutely been condoned by current and former presidents. I was particularly dismayed when GWB wrote an essay on systemic racism in the wake of George Floyd. It goes without saying that the Obamas, especially Michelle, are completely on board with the systemic racism narrative.
As for Trump, I think he went too hard on the election theft thing, in service of his inability to admit to losing. Some doofi took that as permission to enter the Capitol, through unguarded, unlocked doors. Trump immediately told them to go home, and immediately made clear that the rule of law must exist. As it does not, to this day, in Portland.
He didn't tell them immediately. He also told them that he loved them. He said that Mike Pence was a coward, and has repeatedly personally attacked numbers of people who refused to attempt to subvert the US Constitution on his behalf.
If you can't see the difference between supporting the idea of systemic racism as being a problem and encouraging the mob, then there's not much point discussing it.
I support Irish independence, but I sure as hell don't condone the Provisional IRA, or make excuses for their murderous barbarism.
-
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
A second difference is that the violent fanaticism on the left, which in many cases is actually worse than that on the right, was not egged on by a former or current President of the United States.
The fact that people cannot bring themselves to condemn this individual is pretty close to being tacit approval of the violence that took place in the Capitol.
To call these people 'conservatives' is an insult to a great political tradition.
Wokeism and anti-racism have absolutely been condoned by current and former presidents. I was particularly dismayed when GWB wrote an essay on systemic racism in the wake of George Floyd. It goes without saying that the Obamas, especially Michelle, are completely on board with the systemic racism narrative.
As for Trump, I think he went too hard on the election theft thing, in service of his inability to admit to losing. Some doofi took that as permission to enter the Capitol, through unguarded, unlocked doors. Trump immediately told them to go home, and immediately made clear that the rule of law must exist. As it does not, to this day, in Portland.
He didn't tell them immediately. He also told them that he loved them. He said that Mike Pence was a coward, and has repeatedly personally attacked numbers of people who refused to attempt to subvert the US Constitution on his behalf.
If you can't see the difference between supporting the idea of systemic racism as being a problem and encouraging the mob, then there's not much point discussing it.
I support Irish independence, but I sure as hell don't condone the Provisional IRA, or make excuses for their murderous barbarism.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 18:43 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Don't be so obtuse, Jolly. Phibes knows the difference and has unequivocally stated that he is repulsed by the violent fanaticism on both left and right.
A second difference is that the violent fanaticism on the left, which in many cases is actually worse than that on the right, was not egged on by a former or current President of the United States.
The fact that people cannot bring themselves to condemn this individual is pretty close to being tacit approval of the violence that took place in the Capitol.
To call these people 'conservatives' is an insult to a great political tradition.
Wokeism and anti-racism have absolutely been condoned by current and former presidents. I was particularly dismayed when GWB wrote an essay on systemic racism in the wake of George Floyd. It goes without saying that the Obamas, especially Michelle, are completely on board with the systemic racism narrative.
As for Trump, I think he went too hard on the election theft thing, in service of his inability to admit to losing. Some doofi took that as permission to enter the Capitol, through unguarded, unlocked doors. Trump immediately told them to go home, and immediately made clear that the rule of law must exist. As it does not, to this day, in Portland.
He didn't tell them immediately. He also told them that he loved them. He said that Mike Pence was a coward, and has repeatedly personally attacked numbers of people who refused to attempt to subvert the US Constitution on his behalf.
If you can't see the difference between supporting the idea of systemic racism as being a problem and encouraging the mob, then there's not much point discussing it.
I support Irish independence, but I sure as hell don't condone the Provisional IRA, or make excuses for their murderous barbarism.
Trump is an asshole, and he shouldn't have called Pence a coward. I understand he told the whole crowd he loved them, in the same speech where he specifically condemned any lawlessness. If that speech wasn't immediate, it was close to. I don't believe Trump ever saw a positive side to a Capitol invasion or any lawlessness whatsoever. I believe he's smarter than that.
I do not believe he leads a murderous barbarous mob. -
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
What did conservatives ever do to you?
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 18:52 last edited by Renauda@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
What did conservatives ever do to you?
What conservatives? Haven't seen or heard much of them lately. Do you know any? I believe there is one conservative poster in this forum but that individual hasn't posted in this thread yet.
-
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
What did conservatives ever do to you?
What conservatives? Haven't seen or heard much of them lately. Do you know any? I believe there is one conservative poster in this forum but that individual hasn't posted in this thread yet.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 18:54 last edited by@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
What did conservatives ever do to you?
What conservatives? Haven't seen or heard much of them lately. Do you know any? I believe there is one conservative poster in this forum but that individual hasn't posted in this thread yet.
Are we playing word games now? In what way do I not rate as a conservative? Use your words.
-
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 19:01 last edited by
I'm a liberal, but I'm not an American liberal.
I like Top Gear, but I won't countenance American Top Gear under any circumstances.
-
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
What did conservatives ever do to you?
What conservatives? Haven't seen or heard much of them lately. Do you know any? I believe there is one conservative poster in this forum but that individual hasn't posted in this thread yet.
Are we playing word games now? In what way do I not rate as a conservative? Use your words.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 19:05 last edited by@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
What did conservatives ever do to you?
What conservatives? Haven't seen or heard much of them lately. Do you know any? I believe there is one conservative poster in this forum but that individual hasn't posted in this thread yet.
Are we playing word games now? In what way do I not rate as a conservative? Use your words.
No. Why?
-
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
What did conservatives ever do to you?
What conservatives? Haven't seen or heard much of them lately. Do you know any? I believe there is one conservative poster in this forum but that individual hasn't posted in this thread yet.
Are we playing word games now? In what way do I not rate as a conservative? Use your words.
No. Why?
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 19:07 last edited by@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace said in The Big Lie:
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
@horace I agree one is a bigger problem than the other. But that is where we are surely bound to disagree.
What did conservatives ever do to you?
What conservatives? Haven't seen or heard much of them lately. Do you know any? I believe there is one conservative poster in this forum but that individual hasn't posted in this thread yet.
Are we playing word games now? In what way do I not rate as a conservative? Use your words.
No. Why?
I self identify as a conservative. It's pretty illiberal of you to question my self identification. Conservative even.
-
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 19:15 last edited by
I'd humbly suggest that Renauda qualifies as a conservative, at least in a country that hasn't changed the meaning of the term.
-
I'd humbly suggest that Renauda qualifies as a conservative, at least in a country that hasn't changed the meaning of the term.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 19:31 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
I'd humbly suggest that Renauda qualifies as a conservative, at least in a country that hasn't changed the meaning of the term.
But he identifies as left-leaning in America. And apparently thinks there is only one actual conservative on this forum. I'm just asking him to explain his definition, but I'm not holding my breath.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
I'd humbly suggest that Renauda qualifies as a conservative, at least in a country that hasn't changed the meaning of the term.
But he identifies as left-leaning in America. And apparently thinks there is only one actual conservative on this forum. I'm just asking him to explain his definition, but I'm not holding my breath.
-
I'd humbly suggest that Renauda qualifies as a conservative, at least in a country that hasn't changed the meaning of the term.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 19:54 last edited by Renauda@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
I'd humbly suggest that Renauda qualifies as a conservative, at least in a country that hasn't changed the meaning of the term.
That was probably the case until about six or seven years ago. Since that time I have come to the conclusion that conservatism in this country is every bit as intellectually and morally bankrupt as it is elsewhere in the western world. Much of it has to do with a half century of unopposed conservative governance in the province I live along with the perversion of conservatism federally under the Harper regime.
Right now I am happy that I live in the only NDP federal riding in Alberta. Likewise, the city in which I live, returned an almost exclusive NDP sweep in the provincial election 18 months ago. It is the only credible opposition to the United Conservatives that won that provincial election.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Big Lie:
I'd humbly suggest that Renauda qualifies as a conservative, at least in a country that hasn't changed the meaning of the term.
That was probably the case until about six or seven years ago. Since that time I have come to the conclusion that conservatism in this country is every bit as intellectually and morally bankrupt as it is elsewhere in the western world. Much of it has to do with a half century of unopposed conservative governance in the province I live along with the perversion of conservatism federally under the Harper regime.
Right now I am happy that I live in the only NDP federal riding in Alberta. Likewise, the city in which I live, returned an almost exclusive NDP sweep in the provincial election 18 months ago. It is the only credible opposition to the United Conservatives that won that provincial election.
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 20:39 last edited by Copper@renauda said in The Big Lie:
morally bankrupt
Morals are universal and have little to do with political leaning.
There are of course those who think life is all about the moral high-ground (aka wokeness).
This is ignorance. Which also has little to do with political leanings.
-
wrote on 23 Feb 2021, 21:40 last edited by
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Glad you're not holding your breath. You just might hurt yourself.
Glad you're not attempting to explain your contention that there is only one real conservative on this forum. You just might embarrass yourself.
-
@renauda said in The Big Lie:
Glad you're not holding your breath. You just might hurt yourself.
Glad you're not attempting to explain your contention that there is only one real conservative on this forum. You just might embarrass yourself.
