Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?

Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
73 Posts 14 Posters 766 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours. I’d say the January 6th attack, invasion, insurrection...much worse. Plus a few deaths, too.

    George KG LuFins DadL JollyJ 4 Replies Last reply
    • 89th8 89th

      Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours. I’d say the January 6th attack, invasion, insurrection...much worse. Plus a few deaths, too.

      George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      @89th said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

      Zero deaths.

      Yeah, the one death that we know can be directly attributed to the rioters is that of an unarmed woman shot in the neck by...well, we really don't know by whom, do we?

      I suppose you can attribute one more, the person who was trampled. That, however, was unintentional.

      We don't know the circumstances of Officer Sicknick's the other deaths, and it's going to be a stretch to say that a heart attack, or stroke was a direct result of the riot. Good luck proving that in court.

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

        Was not on January 6th...

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_United_States_Senate_bombing

        So can we please stop that narrative?

        Oh yeah, one of the main culprits?

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rosenberg

        Today, she is on the board of directors of Thousand Currents, a nonprofit that sponsors BLM.

        Aqua LetiferA Offline
        Aqua LetiferA Offline
        Aqua Letifer
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        @lufins-dad said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_United_States_Senate_bombing
        So can we please stop that narrative?

        Yep, that's a very legit point.

        Please love yourself.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • 89th8 89th

          Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours. I’d say the January 6th attack, invasion, insurrection...much worse. Plus a few deaths, too.

          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @89th said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

          Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours.

          Also, in what universe is this not domestic terrorism? Motive matters.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 89th

            Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours. I’d say the January 6th attack, invasion, insurrection...much worse. Plus a few deaths, too.

            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            @89th said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

            Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours. I’d say the January 6th attack, invasion, insurrection...much worse. Plus a few deaths, too.

            They are morally superior because of failure in their attempt to kill United States Senators and Representatives?

            The Brad

            89th8 1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG George K

              @89th said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

              Zero deaths.

              Yeah, the one death that we know can be directly attributed to the rioters is that of an unarmed woman shot in the neck by...well, we really don't know by whom, do we?

              I suppose you can attribute one more, the person who was trampled. That, however, was unintentional.

              We don't know the circumstances of Officer Sicknick's the other deaths, and it's going to be a stretch to say that a heart attack, or stroke was a direct result of the riot. Good luck proving that in court.

              RenaudaR Offline
              RenaudaR Offline
              Renauda
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @george-k said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

              Yeah, the one death that we know can be directly attributed to the rioters is that of an unarmed woman shot in the neck by...well, we really don't know by whom, do we?

              Ashli Babbitt was her name. As I understand it, although I could be wrong, she was shot by police or Secret Service inside the Capitol Building on 6 January.

              Don't know why she was there that day. Got swept up in all the selfie taking I guess. On the other hand, she could have been making mischief there.

              I don't know.

              Elbows up!

              George KG 1 Reply Last reply
              • RenaudaR Renauda

                @george-k said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                Yeah, the one death that we know can be directly attributed to the rioters is that of an unarmed woman shot in the neck by...well, we really don't know by whom, do we?

                Ashli Babbitt was her name. As I understand it, although I could be wrong, she was shot by police or Secret Service inside the Capitol Building on 6 January.

                Don't know why she was there that day. Got swept up in all the selfie taking I guess. On the other hand, she could have been making mischief there.

                I don't know.

                George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by George K
                #9

                @renauda said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                Ashli Babbitt was her name. As I understand it, although I could be wrong, she was shot by police or Secret Service inside the Capitol Building on 6 January.
                Don't know why she was there that day. Got swept up in all the selfie taking I guess. On the other hand, she could have been making mischief there.
                I don't know.

                Her name has been all over the press.

                Yes, shot by police OR Secret Service - we don't know by which, or the identity of the shooter.

                She was there rioting with all the other doofuses. She was, indeed, making mischief by breaking through a broken window into a hallway.

                She was shot at that time, even before the crossed the window. And, she was unarmed. The video is all over YouTube.

                These are serious questions:

                Who shot her?
                What was the justification?
                Why has the name of the shooter not been released?

                I'm by no means justifying her actions. She was a stupid idiot.

                But being stupid and unarmed doesn't justify being shot by an unidentified cop.

                Why is there no outrage over her shooting, but Kenosha burned?

                That question, of course, is rhetorical.

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                  #10

                  It must suck to feel the need to circle the wagons with these clowns.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                    @89th said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                    Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours. I’d say the January 6th attack, invasion, insurrection...much worse. Plus a few deaths, too.

                    They are morally superior because of failure in their attempt to kill United States Senators and Representatives?

                    89th8 Offline
                    89th8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on last edited by 89th
                    #11

                    @lufins-dad said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                    @89th said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                    Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours. I’d say the January 6th attack, invasion, insurrection...much worse. Plus a few deaths, too.

                    They are morally superior because of failure in their attempt to kill United States Senators and Representatives?

                    No I’m just saying if you compare the night bomb that didn’t hurt anyone to a mob of thousands that resulted in multiple deaths, hundreds of injuries, and included a number of people out to kill Pence and Pelosi... the comparison of which attack is “worse” is clear to me.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      It must suck to feel the need to circle the wagons with these clowns.

                      George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @jon-nyc said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                      It must suck to feel the need to circle the wagons with these clowns.

                      As far as I can tell, no one is circling wagons with these doofuses. Simply pointing out that the outrage over these events on Federal property are being given much more attention than similar events in Portland, when the Speaker of the House referred to the National Guard as "Stormtroopers."

                      And now, there are thousands of "stormtroopers" in Washington DC, and she is silent. A month later, they're still there.

                      And the media was silent, as was the Vice President, who actually encouraged more violence last summer. I was in Chicago and the suburbs as they burned in August during the "mostly peaceful" protests. I have several friends who were in fear for their lives, homes and businesses last summer.

                      Yeah, 5 people died around the time of the January 6th riot. How many died last summer? How many rapes occurred?

                      Or are deaths more tragic based on the context of the nature of the protest and the location at which they occurred?

                      I'm not justifying, by any means, what happened on Jan 6th. I'm pointing out the silence, the call to violence by the to-be Vice President of the United States, as well as countless other so-called "leaders" of our country.

                      The whole lot disgust me.

                      This is not wagon-circling. This is a GKSR that hasn't even been defined yet.

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • George KG George K

                        @renauda said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                        Ashli Babbitt was her name. As I understand it, although I could be wrong, she was shot by police or Secret Service inside the Capitol Building on 6 January.
                        Don't know why she was there that day. Got swept up in all the selfie taking I guess. On the other hand, she could have been making mischief there.
                        I don't know.

                        Her name has been all over the press.

                        Yes, shot by police OR Secret Service - we don't know by which, or the identity of the shooter.

                        She was there rioting with all the other doofuses. She was, indeed, making mischief by breaking through a broken window into a hallway.

                        She was shot at that time, even before the crossed the window. And, she was unarmed. The video is all over YouTube.

                        These are serious questions:

                        Who shot her?
                        What was the justification?
                        Why has the name of the shooter not been released?

                        I'm by no means justifying her actions. She was a stupid idiot.

                        But being stupid and unarmed doesn't justify being shot by an unidentified cop.

                        Why is there no outrage over her shooting, but Kenosha burned?

                        That question, of course, is rhetorical.

                        RenaudaR Offline
                        RenaudaR Offline
                        Renauda
                        wrote on last edited by Renauda
                        #13

                        @george-k said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                        Who shot her?
                        What was the justification?
                        Why has the name of the shooter not been released?

                        Who shot her? Someone in law enforcement while in the line of duty. But we knew that already.

                        What was the justification? She was a part of an unlawful mob that was rampaging through the Capitol Bldg vandalizing property and, apparently, threatening the Vice President and other elected officials. Whether she was armed or not is irrelevant.

                        Name of the shooter? Can't tell you. But if it was a Secret Service agent who fired the shot, we do not have a need to know, now do we?

                        Elbows up!

                        CopperC George KG JollyJ 3 Replies Last reply
                        • RenaudaR Renauda

                          @george-k said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                          Who shot her?
                          What was the justification?
                          Why has the name of the shooter not been released?

                          Who shot her? Someone in law enforcement while in the line of duty. But we knew that already.

                          What was the justification? She was a part of an unlawful mob that was rampaging through the Capitol Bldg vandalizing property and, apparently, threatening the Vice President and other elected officials. Whether she was armed or not is irrelevant.

                          Name of the shooter? Can't tell you. But if it was a Secret Service agent who fired the shot, we do not have a need to know, now do we?

                          CopperC Offline
                          CopperC Offline
                          Copper
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @renauda said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                          But if it was a Secret Service agent who fired the shot, we do not have a need to know, now do we?

                          How can his family be threatened if his name isn't known?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • RenaudaR Renauda

                            @george-k said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                            Who shot her?
                            What was the justification?
                            Why has the name of the shooter not been released?

                            Who shot her? Someone in law enforcement while in the line of duty. But we knew that already.

                            What was the justification? She was a part of an unlawful mob that was rampaging through the Capitol Bldg vandalizing property and, apparently, threatening the Vice President and other elected officials. Whether she was armed or not is irrelevant.

                            Name of the shooter? Can't tell you. But if it was a Secret Service agent who fired the shot, we do not have a need to know, now do we?

                            George KG Offline
                            George KG Offline
                            George K
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            @renauda said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                            Who shot her? Someone in law enforcement while in the line of duty. But we knew that already.
                            What was the justification?

                            There are very high standards for a LEO shooting someone. Watch the video, and explain the imminent threat to life that this unnamed officer experienced. "In the line of duty" is a wide brush. By that standard, a cop who stops a DUI is entitled to shoot.

                            apparently, threatening the Vice President and other elected officials.

                            Did the mob do that? Perhaps. Did SHE? You'll have to prove it. Good luck.

                            vandalizing property

                            The statues of Andrew Jackson, Jefferson Davis, and the courthouse in Portland would weep, if they could.

                            Whether she was armed or not is irrelevant.

                            No. It is precisely relevant. If she is unarmed, she poses no immediate threat to the officer who shot her. That's the standard in the US. The Canadian standard might be different, and I'd love to learn of what is a justified shooting by Canadian police.

                            Name of the shooter? Can't tell you.

                            Yup. And yet, the names of all the police officers who encountered and killed ARMED protestors are all over the media. Why is that?

                            That's another rhetorical question.

                            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                            RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                            • L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Loki
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Do you think security failures will ever become a thing like every other crisis? You know the big what had to happen for things to go so wrong? All the missed warnings and opportunities, could be an interesting perspective.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • 89th8 89th

                                Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours. I’d say the January 6th attack, invasion, insurrection...much worse. Plus a few deaths, too.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                @89th said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                                Zero deaths. Exploding during night hours. I’d say the January 6th attack, invasion, insurrection...much worse. Plus a few deaths, too.

                                You have fucking got to be kidding me.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • RenaudaR Renauda

                                  @george-k said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                                  Who shot her?
                                  What was the justification?
                                  Why has the name of the shooter not been released?

                                  Who shot her? Someone in law enforcement while in the line of duty. But we knew that already.

                                  What was the justification? She was a part of an unlawful mob that was rampaging through the Capitol Bldg vandalizing property and, apparently, threatening the Vice President and other elected officials. Whether she was armed or not is irrelevant.

                                  Name of the shooter? Can't tell you. But if it was a Secret Service agent who fired the shot, we do not have a need to know, now do we?

                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  Jolly
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @renauda said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                                  @george-k said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                                  Who shot her?
                                  What was the justification?
                                  Why has the name of the shooter not been released?

                                  Who shot her? Someone in law enforcement while in the line of duty. But we knew that already.

                                  What was the justification? She was a part of an unlawful mob that was rampaging through the Capitol Bldg vandalizing property and, apparently, threatening the Vice President and other elected officials. Whether she was armed or not is irrelevant.

                                  Name of the shooter? Can't tell you. But if it was a Secret Service agent who fired the shot, we do not have a need to know, now do we?

                                  I was with you until the anonymous shooter part.

                                  You can't kill an American citizen even in a line of duty legal shooting and remain anonymous.

                                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                  RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor Phibes
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    If you name Secret Service agents, then it's not a very secret service, is it?

                                    To be honest, I'm surprised more of these knobheads weren't killed. The idea that you can go rampaging through government buildings acting like a total cock seemed to be fairly commonplace among them. In a number of countries, there'd have been considerably more use of government weaponry to combat these cretins.

                                    I was only joking

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nyc
                                      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                      #20

                                      Honestly the attempts to minimize and resort to whattaboutism are ultimately a type of wagon circling or weak defense.

                                      It’s pretty liberating to just be able to criticize these guys the way they deserve without any “buts” or “it just thats” added on.

                                      Think back to people ‘contextualizing’ 9/11 or comparing it to this or that US led attack from history.

                                      “I fully condemn the attacks on the trade center, but whattabout Iran in 1956...”.

                                      “I don’t support the attacks on NY and the Pentagon, it’s just that...”

                                      Only non-witches get due process.

                                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                      George KG L HoraceH 3 Replies Last reply
                                      • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor Phibes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        IRA apologists occasionally used to talk about the atrocities committed by Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658)

                                        I was only joking

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • George KG George K

                                          @renauda said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                                          Who shot her? Someone in law enforcement while in the line of duty. But we knew that already.
                                          What was the justification?

                                          There are very high standards for a LEO shooting someone. Watch the video, and explain the imminent threat to life that this unnamed officer experienced. "In the line of duty" is a wide brush. By that standard, a cop who stops a DUI is entitled to shoot.

                                          apparently, threatening the Vice President and other elected officials.

                                          Did the mob do that? Perhaps. Did SHE? You'll have to prove it. Good luck.

                                          vandalizing property

                                          The statues of Andrew Jackson, Jefferson Davis, and the courthouse in Portland would weep, if they could.

                                          Whether she was armed or not is irrelevant.

                                          No. It is precisely relevant. If she is unarmed, she poses no immediate threat to the officer who shot her. That's the standard in the US. The Canadian standard might be different, and I'd love to learn of what is a justified shooting by Canadian police.

                                          Name of the shooter? Can't tell you.

                                          Yup. And yet, the names of all the police officers who encountered and killed ARMED protestors are all over the media. Why is that?

                                          That's another rhetorical question.

                                          RenaudaR Offline
                                          RenaudaR Offline
                                          Renauda
                                          wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                          #22

                                          @george-k said in Worst attack on the Capital since 1812?:

                                          Whether she was armed or not is irrelevant.

                                          No. It is precisely relevant. If she is unarmed, she poses no immediate threat to the officer who shot her. That's the standard in the US. The Canadian standard might be different, and I'd love to learn of what is a justified shooting by Canadian police.

                                          To be honest I do not know what the standard is here. I can ask though, a very close friend of mine is retired from the Calgary Police Force and served on the tactical unit and riot squad for several years.

                                          I do know however, that people personnel on what we call the Integrated Intelligence Unit which is made up of select RCMP, municipal police, Military and CSIS would remain anonymous in the event they were ever engaged in a similar fracas and shooting that occurred in the Capitol that day.

                                          Elbows up!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups