Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Pardonpalooza

Pardonpalooza

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
70 Posts 19 Posters 1.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CopperC Offline
    CopperC Offline
    Copper
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    OMG, look at that face.

    How could he pardon an unattractive person?

    He looks kind of scary.

    Yuck

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
      #45

      This one is kind of gross.

      Dr. Salomon E. Melgen, 66, a major Democratic donor and eye doctor who ran a series of clinics in Florida that fraudulently told Medicare patients that they had eye diseases and then performed medically unnecessary tests and procedures, falsely billing the federal government at least $42 million, according to prosecutors. His remaining prison sentence was commuted.

      He was the largest Medicare fraudster in history, performed unnecessary procedures on senior citizens and is still serving a sentence.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      L 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        This one is kind of gross.

        Dr. Salomon E. Melgen, 66, a major Democratic donor and eye doctor who ran a series of clinics in Florida that fraudulently told Medicare patients that they had eye diseases and then performed medically unnecessary tests and procedures, falsely billing the federal government at least $42 million, according to prosecutors. His remaining prison sentence was commuted.

        He was the largest Medicare fraudster in history, performed unnecessary procedures on senior citizens and is still serving a sentence.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Loki
        wrote on last edited by
        #46

        @jon-nyc said in Pardonpalooza:

        This one is kind of gross.

        Dr. Salomon E. Melgen, 66, a major Democratic donor and eye doctor who ran a series of clinics in Florida that fraudulently told Medicare patients that they had eye diseases and then performed medically unnecessary tests and procedures, falsely billing the federal government at least $42 million, according to prosecutors. His remaining prison sentence was commuted.

        He was the largest Medicare fraudster in history, performed unnecessary procedures on senior citizens and is still serving a sentence.

        Yuck but a deep dive into this one is going to involve Sen. Bob Melendez.

        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
        • L Loki

          @jon-nyc said in Pardonpalooza:

          This one is kind of gross.

          Dr. Salomon E. Melgen, 66, a major Democratic donor and eye doctor who ran a series of clinics in Florida that fraudulently told Medicare patients that they had eye diseases and then performed medically unnecessary tests and procedures, falsely billing the federal government at least $42 million, according to prosecutors. His remaining prison sentence was commuted.

          He was the largest Medicare fraudster in history, performed unnecessary procedures on senior citizens and is still serving a sentence.

          Yuck but a deep dive into this one is going to involve Sen. Bob Melendez.

          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #47

          @loki Beat me!

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • X Offline
            X Offline
            xenon
            wrote on last edited by
            #48

            I get all the theoretical arguments for using pardons as a pressure valve on errors made by the judiciary.

            The theory is nice - but it seems like these disproportionately go to folks high-profile enough to get the ear of the President.

            Maybe there should be some sort of veto against these... e.g., if all SC justices say no or something.. something.

            George KG jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
            • X xenon

              I get all the theoretical arguments for using pardons as a pressure valve on errors made by the judiciary.

              The theory is nice - but it seems like these disproportionately go to folks high-profile enough to get the ear of the President.

              Maybe there should be some sort of veto against these... e.g., if all SC justices say no or something.. something.

              George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #49

              @xenon said in Pardonpalooza:

              Maybe there should be some sort of veto against these... e.g., if all SC justices say no or something.. something.

              That would require a Constitutional amendment.

              Not gonna happen.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              X 1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG George K

                @xenon said in Pardonpalooza:

                Maybe there should be some sort of veto against these... e.g., if all SC justices say no or something.. something.

                That would require a Constitutional amendment.

                Not gonna happen.

                X Offline
                X Offline
                xenon
                wrote on last edited by xenon
                #50

                @george-k said in Pardonpalooza:

                @xenon said in Pardonpalooza:

                Maybe there should be some sort of veto against these... e.g., if all SC justices say no or something.. something.

                That would require a Constitutional amendment.

                Not gonna happen.

                It seems like the bottleneck is that a sitting President has to ask for a curb to his power. Some of his party would fall in line, and the opposition would almost certainly oblige.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • George KG George K

                  @loki Beat me!

                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                  #51

                  @george-k , @Loki

                  Right but Menendez doesn’t have pardon power or influence over Trump.

                  This one was probably just purchased. Unless there’s some connection via West Palm

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  • X xenon

                    I get all the theoretical arguments for using pardons as a pressure valve on errors made by the judiciary.

                    The theory is nice - but it seems like these disproportionately go to folks high-profile enough to get the ear of the President.

                    Maybe there should be some sort of veto against these... e.g., if all SC justices say no or something.. something.

                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #52

                    @xenon said in Pardonpalooza:

                    but it seems like these disproportionately go to folks high-profile enough to get the ear of the President.

                    I’m not sure if that’s generally true or just true for Trump and/or true for just the cases that make the news.

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    X 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      @xenon said in Pardonpalooza:

                      but it seems like these disproportionately go to folks high-profile enough to get the ear of the President.

                      I’m not sure if that’s generally true or just true for Trump and/or true for just the cases that make the news.

                      X Offline
                      X Offline
                      xenon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #53

                      @jon-nyc said in Pardonpalooza:

                      @xenon said in Pardonpalooza:

                      but it seems like these disproportionately go to folks high-profile enough to get the ear of the President.

                      I’m not sure if that’s generally true or just true for Trump and/or true for just the cases that make the news.

                      My comment wasn't in the spirit of Trump - I'm reading his pardons as par-for-the-course (even with the handful of really gross ones in there).

                      I don't expect the vetoes (or whatever mechanism) to be used, unless it's a truly abusive pardon. And that in and of itself should hopefully curb those type.

                      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                      • CopperC Offline
                        CopperC Offline
                        Copper
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #54

                        No way

                        The dems wouldn't let even one Trump pardon pass.

                        They would say "truly abusive" all day long.

                        And vice versa.

                        No way.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                          @george-k , @Loki

                          Right but Menendez doesn’t have pardon power or influence over Trump.

                          This one was probably just purchased. Unless there’s some connection via West Palm

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Loki
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #55

                          @jon-nyc said in Pardonpalooza:

                          @george-k , @Loki

                          Right but Menendez doesn’t have pardon power or influence over Trump.

                          This one was probably just purchased. Unless there’s some connection via West Palm

                          Perhaps his letter on how wonderful he is had no impact but it exists and it’s a good place to start looking for why. Could be a dead end but Mendendez has a habit of being misunderstood. Lol

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • X xenon

                            @jon-nyc said in Pardonpalooza:

                            @xenon said in Pardonpalooza:

                            but it seems like these disproportionately go to folks high-profile enough to get the ear of the President.

                            I’m not sure if that’s generally true or just true for Trump and/or true for just the cases that make the news.

                            My comment wasn't in the spirit of Trump - I'm reading his pardons as par-for-the-course (even with the handful of really gross ones in there).

                            I don't expect the vetoes (or whatever mechanism) to be used, unless it's a truly abusive pardon. And that in and of itself should hopefully curb those type.

                            George KG Offline
                            George KG Offline
                            George K
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #56

                            @xenon said in Pardonpalooza:

                            I don't expect the vetoes (or whatever mechanism) to be used, unless it's a truly abusive pardon. And that in and of itself should hopefully curb those type.

                            The President's power to pardon is constitutionally guaranteed. It is plenary, and without an amendment (and that's one high bar), irrevocable.

                            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • RainmanR Offline
                              RainmanR Offline
                              Rainman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #57

                              Wouldn't it be fun if Trump were to have pardoned everybody. Open the jailhouse doors. Kinda like a "Reset" or something. "You're all free to go!" And then encourage those released on where they should go.

                              We start over.

                              Another of my great ideas ignored. Oh well.

                              Catseye3C Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
                              • Catseye3C Catseye3

                                @horace said in Pardonpalooza:

                                Lots of destruction of the republic going around.

                                I didn't post Mason's argument to support any position of mine, but because I thought it was interesting in its own right.

                                I don't know enough about the prez pardon to have a position.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #58

                                @catseye3 said in Pardonpalooza:

                                @horace said in Pardonpalooza:

                                Lots of destruction of the republic going around.

                                I didn't post Mason's argument to support any position of mine, but because I thought it was interesting in its own right.

                                I don't know enough about the prez pardon to have a position.

                                Educate thyself.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • RainmanR Rainman

                                  Wouldn't it be fun if Trump were to have pardoned everybody. Open the jailhouse doors. Kinda like a "Reset" or something. "You're all free to go!" And then encourage those released on where they should go.

                                  We start over.

                                  Another of my great ideas ignored. Oh well.

                                  Catseye3C Offline
                                  Catseye3C Offline
                                  Catseye3
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #59

                                  @rainman said in Pardonpalooza:

                                  Another of my great ideas ignored. Oh well.

                                  But keep on keepin' on, Rainman! One of them is bound to capture the imagination of we us the people. 🙂

                                  Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • RainmanR Rainman

                                    Wouldn't it be fun if Trump were to have pardoned everybody. Open the jailhouse doors. Kinda like a "Reset" or something. "You're all free to go!" And then encourage those released on where they should go.

                                    We start over.

                                    Another of my great ideas ignored. Oh well.

                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor Phibes
                                    wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                                    #60

                                    @rainman said in Pardonpalooza:

                                    And then encourage those released on where they should go.

                                    Palm Beach, FL?

                                    I was only joking

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nyc
                                      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                      #61

                                      I’m sure the guys that were arrested with Bannon are pretty jealous right now. They did the same thing, and they weren’t pardoned, after all.

                                      But I wonder if it has occurred to them that they’re extra fucked now? Bannon can’t plead 5th amendment protection from self-incrimination so he can be compelled to testify against his co-conspirators. And if he lies that’s a new federal crime not covered by the pardon.

                                      Only non-witches get due process.

                                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                        I’m sure the guys that were arrested with Bannon are pretty jealous right now. They did the same thing, and they weren’t pardoned, after all.

                                        But I wonder if it has occurred to them that they’re extra fucked now? Bannon can’t plead 5th amendment protection from self-incrimination so he can be compelled to testify against his co-conspirators. And if he lies that’s a new federal crime not covered by the pardon.

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Loki
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #62

                                        @jon-nyc said in Pardonpalooza:

                                        I’m sure the guys that were arrested with Bannon are pretty jealous right now. They did the same thing, and they weren’t pardoned, after all.

                                        But I wonder if it has occurred to them that they’re extra fucked now? Bannon can’t plead 5th amendment protection from self-incrimination so he can be compelled to testify against his co-conspirators. And if he lies that’s a new federal crime not covered by the pardon.

                                        I guess the reality is you have a weird case or two which is a high contrast to what an imagined pardonpalooza would have looked like.

                                        Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nyc
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #63

                                          Did you read the McCarthy piece?

                                          Only non-witches get due process.

                                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups