Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?

[Horace]

@89th said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

True. But taking over a city block in Portland is nothing compared to a sitting president claiming an election he lost was stolen and fraudulent.

Is it nothing? That's a claim. Not one that is inarguable.

Elections lost due to fraudulence, as a social idea, are far from a new thing. Neighborhoods being taken over, now there's a new thing.

[Aqua Letifer]

@89th said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

True. But taking over a city block in Portland is nothing compared to a sitting president claiming an election he lost was stolen and fraudulent.

Of course it isn't. The Portland thing is worse because I hate pop culture more than I do people trying to compromise an election.

[Horace]

@aqua-letifer said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

@89th said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

True. But taking over a city block in Portland is nothing compared to a sitting president claiming an election he lost was stolen and fraudulent.

Of course it isn't. The Portland thing is worse because I hate pop culture more than I do people trying to compromise an election.

Ok, so make a choice. Call it hate, whatever. You can choose to hate both, great on you.

[Jolly]

Lots of hate to go around.

[Jolly]

@89th said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

True. But taking over a city block in Portland is nothing compared to a sitting president claiming an election he lost was stolen and fraudulent.

Bullshit.

[Renauda]

I have to agree with Jolly on this. When a mob rampages it rampages blind regardless of its target.

[Copper]

@89th said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

True. But taking over a city block in Portland is nothing compared to a sitting president claiming an election he lost was stolen and fraudulent.

I believe that is incorrect.

[89th]

@copper said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

@89th said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

True. But taking over a city block in Portland is nothing compared to a sitting president claiming an election he lost was stolen and fraudulent.

I believe that is incorrect.

So you’d be fine if Obama refused to accept a landslide loss to Romney in 2012?

[Copper]

@89th said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

@copper said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

@89th said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

True. But taking over a city block in Portland is nothing compared to a sitting president claiming an election he lost was stolen and fraudulent.

I believe that is incorrect.

So you’d be fine if Obama refused to accept a landslide loss to Romney in 2012?

Sure, of course, why not?

Calmly and dispassionately review the problem and fix it.

What's the big deal?

[taiwan_girl]

@copper said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

Calmly and dispassionately review the problem and fix it.

Is that how President Trump handled it? Lol

[Copper]

@taiwan_girl said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

@copper said in Senate trial could happen after Jan 20?:

Calmly and dispassionately review the problem and fix it.

Is that how President Trump handled it? Lol

In the beginning, even before the election, yes.