Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trump's reaction to losing

Trump's reaction to losing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
73 Posts 14 Posters 892 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    @Loki said in Trump's reaction to losing:

    @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

    It's broken. There are millions of people who no longer trust the ballot box.

    You cannot put the genie back in the box.

    It’s not that I don’t trust it but It reinforces my opinion that most people should vote the day of the election.

    The nation who has millions of its citizens carrying cellphones that can only be unlocked with a unique thumbprint, can't figure out how to deal with voter fraud.

    That is unconscionable.

    X Online
    X Online
    xenon
    wrote on last edited by xenon
    #33

    @Jolly I don’t disagree with you, Jolly.

    But I think a lot of privacy purists would disagree.

    If you had a digital identifier for citizens (simple to do) - it’d be pretty easy to make a secure National digital system for multiple purposes, including voting.

    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Jolly

      It's broken. There are millions of people who no longer trust the ballot box.

      You cannot put the genie back in the box.

      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

      It's broken. There are millions of people who no longer trust the ballot box.

      You cannot put the genie back in the box.

      As I said Perhaps Trump’s biggest legacy.

      You were warned.

      HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
      • X xenon

        @Jolly I don’t disagree with you, Jolly.

        But I think a lot of privacy purists would disagree.

        If you had a digital identifier for citizens (simple to do) - it’d be pretty easy to make a secure National digital system for multiple purposes, including voting.

        JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        @xenon said in Trump's reaction to losing:

        @Jolly I don’t disagree with you, Jolly.

        But I think a lot of privacy purists would disagree.

        If you had a digital identifier for citizens (simple to do) - it’d be pretty easy to make a secure National digital system for multiple purposes, including voting.

        The fix is easy.

        You end mail-in ballots. Voters must vote in person, except those allowed by federal law (military, etc.) to use a mail-in vote (and then you have to keep them out of the trash, as in Georgia). You can still let people vote early, as long as it is done in person, with ID and signature verification, not more than two weeks before the general election date. You have poll watchers, even at early voting. No voting or counting will be done without those watchers present.

        And you make voter fraud a crime that carries very heavy penalties.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • X xenon

          @Larry I’m not trying to bash the guy and I’m not saying voting in this country is perfect. I just hate to see a lot of people think that the process is irrevocably broken.

          I don’t think it is. I think there’s probably lots of errors and even some malice across the country.

          I don’t think it’s systematic, and if it is - there needs to be evidence before those sort of accusations are thrown out.

          Our trust in elections is bigger than any single election.

          LarryL Offline
          LarryL Offline
          Larry
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          @xenon said in Trump's reaction to losing:

          @Larry I’m not trying to bash the guy and I’m not saying voting in this country is perfect. I just hate to see a lot of people think that the process is irrevocably broken.

          I don’t think it is. I think there’s probably lots of errors and even some malice across the country.

          I don’t think it’s systematic, and if it is - there needs to be evidence before those sort of accusations are thrown out.

          Our trust in elections is bigger than any single election.

          Then fucking say THAT instead of stringing together a litany of mean spirited bull shit aimed at Trump. Yes you ARE trying to bash the guy. And the process IS broken.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • CopperC Offline
            CopperC Offline
            Copper
            wrote on last edited by Copper
            #37

            Register at least a month in advance

            One day for voting, maybe 5 or 6 hours

            Index finger in the purple paint

            No write-in, no absentee

            You don't have an index finger? No vote

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              Nobody should be allowed to register on election day.

              Nobody.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • AxtremusA Offline
                AxtremusA Offline
                Axtremus
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                @Jolly you put a lot of emphasis on "security" but virtually none on "access".

                Faith in the electoral system will also crumble if a large enough swath of the population cannot cast their votes.

                The logistical challenges of running an election with 76MM voters (1932), 120MM voters (1968), 182MM voters (1988), and 239MM voters (2020) are not the same. Transit technologies and infrastructure change over time and access to transportation change over time. War, natural disasters, and pandemics will necessitate changes from time to time.

                Want to get rid of mail-in voting? Fine, only when easy access to polling stations of sufficient vote processing capacities are available. Commit to guaranteeing that no one has to travel more than X miles to get to a polling station or wait more than Y minutes in line to cast a vote at a polling station, then we can talk about eliminating mail-in voting.

                Otherwise, let's say we allow only in-person voting and put only one polling station in each state, logically located where the population is most dense such that it is "shortest distance" for the most people to get there in person, and see how the country/rural folks like it.

                LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  Access means nothing, if nobody trusts the results.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  X AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
                  • AxtremusA Axtremus

                    @Jolly you put a lot of emphasis on "security" but virtually none on "access".

                    Faith in the electoral system will also crumble if a large enough swath of the population cannot cast their votes.

                    The logistical challenges of running an election with 76MM voters (1932), 120MM voters (1968), 182MM voters (1988), and 239MM voters (2020) are not the same. Transit technologies and infrastructure change over time and access to transportation change over time. War, natural disasters, and pandemics will necessitate changes from time to time.

                    Want to get rid of mail-in voting? Fine, only when easy access to polling stations of sufficient vote processing capacities are available. Commit to guaranteeing that no one has to travel more than X miles to get to a polling station or wait more than Y minutes in line to cast a vote at a polling station, then we can talk about eliminating mail-in voting.

                    Otherwise, let's say we allow only in-person voting and put only one polling station in each state, logically located where the population is most dense such that it is "shortest distance" for the most people to get there in person, and see how the country/rural folks like it.

                    LarryL Offline
                    LarryL Offline
                    Larry
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    @Axtremus said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                    @Jolly you put a lot of emphasis on "security" but virtually none on "access".

                    Faith in the electoral system will also crumble if a large enough swath of the population cannot cast their votes.

                    The logistical challenges of running an election with 76MM voters (1932), 120MM voters (1968), 182MM voters (1988), and 239MM voters (2020) are not the same. Transit technologies and infrastructure change over time and access to transportation change over time. War, natural disasters, and pandemics will necessitate changes from time to time.

                    Want to get rid of mail-in voting? Fine, only when easy access to polling stations of sufficient vote processing capacities are available. Commit to guaranteeing that no one has to travel more than X miles to get to a polling station or wait more than Y minutes in line to cast a vote at a polling station, then we can talk about eliminating mail-in voting.

                    Otherwise, let's say we allow only in-person voting and put only one polling station in each state, logically located where the population is most dense such that it is "shortest distance" for the most people to get there in person, and see how the country/rural folks like it.

                    Oh for Pete's sake. Have you EVER had an original thought? You just repeat the democrat bull shit propaganda all the time. There is no problem with access.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Jolly

                      Access means nothing, if nobody trusts the results.

                      X Online
                      X Online
                      xenon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      @Jolly This Presidency is ending the same way as it started - accusations of voter fraud.

                      He had 4 years and all the resources of the federal government to run that one down.

                      He didn't. Without evidence, he has zero credibility here.

                      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                      • X xenon

                        @Jolly This Presidency is ending the same way as it started - accusations of voter fraud.

                        He had 4 years and all the resources of the federal government to run that one down.

                        He didn't. Without evidence, he has zero credibility here.

                        George KG Offline
                        George KG Offline
                        George K
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #43

                        @xenon said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                        resources of the federal government

                        They were busy investigating RUSSIA!!

                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #44

                          4F82E693-38EF-4E5E-A685-668D70DBF58A.jpeg

                          You were warned.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                            @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                            It's broken. There are millions of people who no longer trust the ballot box.

                            You cannot put the genie back in the box.

                            As I said Perhaps Trump’s biggest legacy.

                            HoraceH Online
                            HoraceH Online
                            Horace
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            @jon-nyc said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                            @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                            It's broken. There are millions of people who no longer trust the ballot box.

                            You cannot put the genie back in the box.

                            As I said Perhaps Trump’s biggest legacy.

                            So convenient. But your hatred really was the first one.

                            Education is extremely important.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • JollyJ Jolly

                              Access means nothing, if nobody trusts the results.

                              AxtremusA Offline
                              AxtremusA Offline
                              Axtremus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #46

                              @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                              Access means nothing, if nobody trusts the results.

                              Democracy means nothing of there is no access.

                              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                Access means nothing, if nobody trusts the results.

                                Democracy means nothing of there is no access.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by Jolly
                                #47

                                @Axtremus said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                Access means nothing, if nobody trusts the results.

                                Democracy means nothing of there is no access.

                                It has been my observation, that the folks in the Soviet Union had an awful lot of access. Routine turnout was greater than 90%, wasn't it?

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                                • JollyJ Jolly

                                  @Axtremus said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                  @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                  Access means nothing, if nobody trusts the results.

                                  Democracy means nothing of there is no access.

                                  It has been my observation, that the folks in the Soviet Union had an awful lot of access. Routine turnout was greater than 90%, wasn't it?

                                  AxtremusA Offline
                                  AxtremusA Offline
                                  Axtremus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #48

                                  @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                  @Axtremus said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                  @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                  Access means nothing, if nobody trusts the results.

                                  Democracy means nothing of there is no access.

                                  It has been my observation, that the folks in the Soviet Union had an awful lot of access. Routine turnout was greater than 90%, wasn't it?

                                  Which tells you the importance of access. Even authoritarian regime has to go to great lengths to manufacture the appearance of high turnout to fake legitimacy.

                                  Russia has a different access problem: viable oppositions have no access to the ballot itself — they cannot get their names onto the ballot.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • JollyJ Offline
                                    JollyJ Offline
                                    Jolly
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #49

                                    In other words, ballot security should take precedence over ballot access.

                                    People who feel cheated out of their votes , eventually rectify that problem. It tends to be a messy affair when they do.

                                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                    AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • JollyJ Jolly

                                      In other words, ballot security should take precedence over ballot access.

                                      People who feel cheated out of their votes , eventually rectify that problem. It tends to be a messy affair when they do.

                                      AxtremusA Offline
                                      AxtremusA Offline
                                      Axtremus
                                      wrote on last edited by Axtremus
                                      #50

                                      @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                      In other words, ballot security should take precedence over ballot access.

                                      Not at all.

                                      People who feel cheated out of their votes , eventually rectify that problem. It tends to be a messy affair when they do.

                                      You feel cheated more immediately if you do not even get to cast a vote.

                                      Or, for that matter, when you are prohibited from voting for the person you want to vote for.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • JollyJ Offline
                                        JollyJ Offline
                                        Jolly
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #51

                                        Wrong.

                                        If the ballot is secure, it means something.

                                        You can have access all day long, but if your ballot gets no further than the dumpster, it means nothing.

                                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • JollyJ Jolly

                                          Wrong.

                                          If the ballot is secure, it means something.

                                          You can have access all day long, but if your ballot gets no further than the dumpster, it means nothing.

                                          AxtremusA Offline
                                          AxtremusA Offline
                                          Axtremus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #52

                                          @Jolly said in Trump's reaction to losing:

                                          Wrong.

                                          If the ballot is secure, it means something.

                                          You can have access all day long, but if your ballot gets no further than the dumpster, it means nothing.

                                          Wrong. You have to be able to vote first before there is even such a thing as “your vote” to go anywhere.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups