Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Calling the States

Calling the States

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
448 Posts 24 Posters 28.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Loki

    @bachophile said in Calling the States:

    How can there be a massive conspiracy in four states involving hundreds of vote counters and not one scrap of evidence?

    I am not addressing conspiracy I am addressing the right for timely results. It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

    X Offline
    X Offline
    xenon
    wrote on last edited by
    #138

    @Loki said in Calling the States:

    @bachophile said in Calling the States:

    How can there be a massive conspiracy in four states involving hundreds of vote counters and not one scrap of evidence?

    I am not addressing conspiracy I am addressing the right for timely results. It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

    I don’t think this country has ever had results on election night. Often it becomes “callable” based on partial results.

    taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
    • X xenon

      @Loki said in Calling the States:

      @bachophile said in Calling the States:

      How can there be a massive conspiracy in four states involving hundreds of vote counters and not one scrap of evidence?

      I am not addressing conspiracy I am addressing the right for timely results. It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

      I don’t think this country has ever had results on election night. Often it becomes “callable” based on partial results.

      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #139

      @xenon said in Calling the States:

      @Loki said in Calling the States:

      @bachophile said in Calling the States:

      How can there be a massive conspiracy in four states involving hundreds of vote counters and not one scrap of evidence?

      I am not addressing conspiracy I am addressing the right for timely results. It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

      I don’t think this country has ever had results on election night. Often it becomes “callable” based on partial results.

      Isn’t that why the inauguration used to be in March? Because of the time it took to finalize the voting Wayback a long time ago?

      1 Reply Last reply
      • kluursK Offline
        kluursK Offline
        kluurs
        wrote on last edited by
        #140

        Yup, each state has its own measures to certify the results of the election. There are no uniform dates for the states to certify results. Some states don't certify their results until December. Thus, the best one can do is project winners based on initial tabulations of the results.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • bachophileB Offline
          bachophileB Offline
          bachophile
          wrote on last edited by
          #141

          Nixon conceded to Kennedy on wed afternoon in 1960. Right now in the states it’s still wed morning. So this year is is still ahead of that.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • kluursK kluurs

            alt text

            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #142

            @kluurs said in Calling the States:

            alt text

            That's clever.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • bachophileB bachophile

              But the whole world knew that there would be a rebound after the initial count

              I knew it. And I have no political acumen. How can it be that he didn’t know?

              89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote on last edited by
              #143

              @bachophile said in Calling the States:

              But the whole world knew that there would be a rebound after the initial count

              I knew it. And I have no political acumen. How can it be that he didn’t know?

              He knew it. He just doesn’t want to admit it, it doesn’t help his fraud narrative.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • L Loki

                @bachophile said in Calling the States:

                How can there be a massive conspiracy in four states involving hundreds of vote counters and not one scrap of evidence?

                I am not addressing conspiracy I am addressing the right for timely results. It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #144

                @Loki said in Calling the States:

                It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

                The GOP specifically blocked it in your state.

                The governor wanted to start counting mail-in as they arrived. The GOP legislature blocked it.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                AxtremusA jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                • George KG George K

                  A trove of 138K votes for Biden, and none for Trump were found.

                  Talk about landslide:

                  alt text

                  kluursK Offline
                  kluursK Offline
                  kluurs
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #145

                  @George-K
                  "That's because it was a data entry error in Shiawassee County and in the Michigan tabulations. I watched it happen. It temporarily took Trump's lead from 270k down to 70k. They fixed it pretty quickly and it was only on Decision Desk HQ that the error occurred (that's the site your screenshot is from) because it happened when they imported results from the various county websites in Michigan." link

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    @Loki said in Calling the States:

                    It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

                    The GOP specifically blocked it in your state.

                    The governor wanted to start counting mail-in as they arrived. The GOP legislature blocked it.

                    AxtremusA Offline
                    AxtremusA Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #146

                    @jon-nyc said in Calling the States:

                    @Loki said in Calling the States:

                    It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

                    The GOP specifically blocked it in your state.

                    The governor wanted to start counting mail-in as they arrived. The GOP legislature blocked it.

                    Which state are we talking about? Is @Loki in Pennsylvania?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      @Loki said in Calling the States:

                      It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

                      The GOP specifically blocked it in your state.

                      The governor wanted to start counting mail-in as they arrived. The GOP legislature blocked it.

                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #147

                      @jon-nyc said in Calling the States:

                      @Loki said in Calling the States:

                      It’s unconscionable for some states to set up a mechanism where the counting isn’t over. It is as simple as that. People have a right to be LIVID

                      The GOP specifically blocked it in your state.

                      The governor wanted to start counting mail-in as they arrived. The GOP legislature blocked it.

                      https://www.mcall.com/news/elections/mc-nws-pa-mail-in-ballot-counting-talks-20201016-nnj2qbl345dexlj2f3ucaiccuu-story.html

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Loki
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #148

                        Refresh my memory as to who said PA would continue to accept ballots postmarked after Election Day.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #149

                          Scotus? You tell me.

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #150

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              Scotus? You tell me.

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Loki
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #151

                              @jon-nyc said in Calling the States:

                              Scotus? You tell me.

                              Lol. I’m not clear anymore either. But regardless who’s fault it is we have the right to know right away. If Florida can do it anyone can. Of course if it’s too close to call you have recounts.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • MikM Offline
                                MikM Offline
                                Mik
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #152

                                alt text

                                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                  Doctor Phibes
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #153

                                  Who the fuck is Rogan O'Handley?

                                  He seem to know a lot about cheating in elections. Maybe they should lock that twat up.

                                  I was only joking

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #154

                                    It’s kind of fun to watch Trump’s twitter feed now, as he oh-so-publicly navigates the stages of grief.

                                    Only non-witches get due process.

                                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                      It’s kind of fun to watch Trump’s twitter feed now, as he oh-so-publicly navigates the stages of grief.

                                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor Phibes
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #155

                                      @jon-nyc said in Calling the States:

                                      It’s kind of fun to watch Trump’s twitter feed now, as he oh-so-publicly navigates the stages of grief.

                                      Maybe the Supreme Court will find him guilty. Do you think he's considered that?

                                      I was only joking

                                      George KG JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                                      • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                        @jon-nyc said in Calling the States:

                                        It’s kind of fun to watch Trump’s twitter feed now, as he oh-so-publicly navigates the stages of grief.

                                        Maybe the Supreme Court will find him guilty. Do you think he's considered that?

                                        George KG Offline
                                        George KG Offline
                                        George K
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #156

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Calling the States:

                                        Maybe the Supreme Court

                                        Can Donald Trump Litigate His Way to Victory via the Supreme Court? Not Likely

                                        https://electionlawblog.org/?p=118159

                                        I’ve been saying consistently that the only way the 2020 presidential election ends up being decided by the courts is if there is a dispute in a state that is central to an electoral college victory and that the dispute in that state is so close (or there is such a massive failure in the election) that the election is within the margin of litigation.

                                        As of this moment (though things can change) it does not appear that either condition will be met. It does not seem that Pennsylvania will be crucial to a Biden electoral college victory and so any litigation over ballots there would not matter.

                                        Even if it came down to Pennsylvania, it would have to be so close that there would be something to litigate over. If it is tens of thousands of votes separating the candidates (as currently in the Michigan totals), it is virtually impossible that a recount or litigation could change an outcome.

                                        Of course, if it does come down to a state like PA and it comes down to ballots arriving between Nov. 3 and 6, the Republicans can go back to the Supreme Court in an attempt to get those thrown out. For reasons I’ve explained, the reliance interest of the voters makes this very unlikely (and the Supreme Court passed up two chances to act on this).

                                        The other lawsuits in PA don’t seem to present much hope for flipping a lot of votes; they involve what appears to be a relatively small number of provisional ballots.

                                        So could the election be litigated to a conclusion? Sure. But it’s not likely unless there is significant tightening in both the electoral college projections and the absolute margin in a key state.

                                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                          Doctor Phibes
                                          wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                                          #157

                                          'Twas just a joke. I didn't actually think the Supreme Court can put him on trial.

                                          I was only joking

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups