Pelosi "I don't think there should be any debates."
-
@jon-nyc said in Pelosi "I don't think there be any debates.":
Round one of expectation setting worked wonderfully. Maybe this is round two.
No debates is beyond outrageous. A normal progressive would cancel this person and they would be off twitter and Facebook. The fact that this is okay is just proof of the blatant hypocrisy of being principled.
Naked aggression is fine with me, just be honest.
-
I don’t think you will know that.
Lowering expectations is a typical campaign strategy whether one knocks of out of the park or just does ok.
@jon-nyc said in Pelosi "I don't think there be any debates.":
I don’t think you will know that.
Lowering expectations is a typical campaign strategy whether one knocks of out of the park or just does ok.
Anything is positive when you start with senility as your baseline.
-
She’s just throwing sand
-
@Mik said in Pelosi "I don't think there be any debates.":
Scared shitless.
I agree they are scared, but I think they still have plenty of shit.
@brenda said in Pelosi "I don't think there be any debates.":
@Mik said in Pelosi "I don't think there be any debates.":
Scared shitless.
I agree they are scared, but I think they still have plenty of shit.
POTD!
-
What is the benefit for Vice President Biden to have a debate? I think it is like Jon said - lower the expectations. LOL
I still do believe that the best campaigner for Vice President Biden is President Trump. LOL Maybe "silence is truly golden"
-
I think they should have a Twitter debate.
-
-
@Mik said in Pelosi "I don't think there be any debates.":
Biden has to debate. Not to will give Trump a landslide.
I think that Vice President Biden will debate, but IF he did not, I really dont think it would change a lot of peoples minds or change the "independents" vote.
I just dont see a debate being the priority item for an undecided voter.
Yes, the Republics would scream and yell, just like the Democrats did when President Trump did not release his taxes.
Stuff like debates and tax release are not required and are somewhat recent.
-
@Mik said in Pelosi "I don't think there be any debates.":
Biden has to debate. Not to will give Trump a landslide.
I think that Vice President Biden will debate, but IF he did not, I really dont think it would change a lot of peoples minds or change the "independents" vote.
I just dont see a debate being the priority item for an undecided voter.
Yes, the Republics would scream and yell, just like the Democrats did when President Trump did not release his taxes.
Stuff like debates and tax release are not required and are somewhat recent.
@taiwan_girl said in Pelosi "I don't think there should be any debates.":
@Mik said in Pelosi "I don't think there be any debates.":
Biden has to debate. Not to will give Trump a landslide.
I think that Vice President Biden will debate, but IF he did not, I really dont think it would change a lot of peoples minds or change the "independents" vote.
I just dont see a debate being the priority item for an undecided voter.
Yes, the Republics would scream and yell, just like the Democrats did when President Trump did not release his taxes.
Stuff like debates and tax release are not required and are somewhat recent.
You cannot be serious. Refusing to debate would absolutely kill him. It wouold be a tacit admission that he is incompetent to perform publicly.
Debates have been part of presidential elections for pretty much our whole lifetimes.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Pelosi "I don't think there should be any debates.":
@Mik said in Pelosi "I don't think there be any debates.":
Biden has to debate. Not to will give Trump a landslide.
I think that Vice President Biden will debate, but IF he did not, I really dont think it would change a lot of peoples minds or change the "independents" vote.
I just dont see a debate being the priority item for an undecided voter.
Yes, the Republics would scream and yell, just like the Democrats did when President Trump did not release his taxes.
Stuff like debates and tax release are not required and are somewhat recent.
You cannot be serious. Refusing to debate would absolutely kill him. It wouold be a tacit admission that he is incompetent to perform publicly.
Debates have been part of presidential elections for pretty much our whole lifetimes.
@Mik I am serious. LOL
Maybe (probably for sure
) I am projecting my thoughts to the whole population, but for me, the debates are a (relatively) small part of the overall campaign. -
@Mik I am serious. LOL
Maybe (probably for sure
) I am projecting my thoughts to the whole population, but for me, the debates are a (relatively) small part of the overall campaign.@taiwan_girl said in Pelosi "I don't think there should be any debates.":
@Mik I am serious. LOL
Maybe (probably for sure
) I am projecting my thoughts to the whole population, but for me, the debates are a (relatively) small part of the overall campaign.Ancient history, but it's pretty well-recognized that people who listened to the Kennedy/Nixon debates thought that Nixon won.
Those who saw it on television thought otherwise, and that was most people.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Pelosi "I don't think there should be any debates.":
@Mik I am serious. LOL
Maybe (probably for sure
) I am projecting my thoughts to the whole population, but for me, the debates are a (relatively) small part of the overall campaign.Ancient history, but it's pretty well-recognized that people who listened to the Kennedy/Nixon debates thought that Nixon won.
Those who saw it on television thought otherwise, and that was most people.
@George-K That is very interesting and I remember reading something about that.
I am guess that in todays world, with the focus group, etc etc, President Nixon's campaign would probably have told him not to debate. There would not be much "upside". Maybe he then would have won. Who knows? LOL But interesting thought exercise.
