Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.3k Posts 20 Posters 143.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Horace

    Trump may have a reasonable point.

    W Offline
    W Offline
    Wim
    wrote last edited by
    #1310

    @Horace If there's a deal between the US and Iran, chances are high Netanyahu will have to face jail.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      @jon-nyc said:

      They have different cost/benefit analyses.

      Yeah that's the crux of what the opposition to the war wants to lay bare. People are suspicious that we don't actually have different goals.

      RenaudaR Offline
      RenaudaR Offline
      Renauda
      wrote last edited by
      #1311

      @Horace said:

      @jon-nyc said:

      They have different cost/benefit analyses.

      Yeah that's the crux of what the opposition to the war wants to lay bare. People are suspicious that we don't actually have different goals.

      So what is your hunch on the matter?

      Elbows up!

      HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
      • RenaudaR Renauda

        @Horace said:

        @jon-nyc said:

        They have different cost/benefit analyses.

        Yeah that's the crux of what the opposition to the war wants to lay bare. People are suspicious that we don't actually have different goals.

        So what is your hunch on the matter?

        HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote last edited by
        #1312

        @Renauda said:

        @Horace said:

        @jon-nyc said:

        They have different cost/benefit analyses.

        Yeah that's the crux of what the opposition to the war wants to lay bare. People are suspicious that we don't actually have different goals.

        So what is your hunch on the matter?

        I reject the stuff about Israel having dirt on Trump and forcing him to do stuff. That's a very popular theory, online at least. "Because there's no other possible reason". That's always a red flag when it appears in someone's chain of logic. There's rarely "no other possible reason".

        I just think the current admin (and previous ones) considers Israel to be an American outpost in the middle east. But if Israel goes their own way, I suspect those ties can be severed, even by this administration. To say nothing of future admins. Seems almost inevitable that this is the last fiercely pro-Israel American administration. The accusations of anti-semitism in an effort to silence opposition to Israel support, are as played out as any other accusation of systemic racism.

        Education is extremely important.

        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Horace

          @Renauda said:

          @Horace said:

          @jon-nyc said:

          They have different cost/benefit analyses.

          Yeah that's the crux of what the opposition to the war wants to lay bare. People are suspicious that we don't actually have different goals.

          So what is your hunch on the matter?

          I reject the stuff about Israel having dirt on Trump and forcing him to do stuff. That's a very popular theory, online at least. "Because there's no other possible reason". That's always a red flag when it appears in someone's chain of logic. There's rarely "no other possible reason".

          I just think the current admin (and previous ones) considers Israel to be an American outpost in the middle east. But if Israel goes their own way, I suspect those ties can be severed, even by this administration. To say nothing of future admins. Seems almost inevitable that this is the last fiercely pro-Israel American administration. The accusations of anti-semitism in an effort to silence opposition to Israel support, are as played out as any other accusation of systemic racism.

          RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote last edited by
          #1313

          @Horace said:

          @Renauda said:

          @Horace said:

          @jon-nyc said:

          They have different cost/benefit analyses.

          Yeah that's the crux of what the opposition to the war wants to lay bare. People are suspicious that we don't actually have different goals.

          So what is your hunch on the matter?

          I reject the stuff about Israel having dirt on Trump and forcing him to do stuff. That's a very popular theory, online at least. "Because there's no other possible reason". That's always a red flag when it appears in someone's chain of logic. There's rarely "no other possible reason".

          I too doubt Netanyahu has much of anything on Trump other than some dubious money deals that went down long before he took up elected office. Probably involves mobster Russian Jews and their ill gotten gains arising from the demise of the USSR and the anarchy of the Yeltsin era.

          I just think the current admin (and previous ones) considers Israel to be an American outpost in the middle east. But if Israel goes their own way, I suspect those ties can be severed, even by this administration. To say nothing of future admins. Seems almost inevitable that this is the last fiercely pro-Israel American administration. The accusations of anti-semitism in an effort to silence opposition to Israel support, are as played out as any other accusation of systemic racism.

          You have mentioned all that before. I am more interested in your personal
          hunch regarding the distracting dogโ€™s breakfast of choice that is now Iran and the Persian Gulf.

          Elbows up!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote last edited by
            #1314

            No strong opinion about Trump's motivations. The fact that Rubio said right after the start that Israel said it was going with or without the US, and that played a role, seems feasible. Even if he did walk that back at some point. Not sure how or why he would have said that if there's wasn't some truth to it.

            Clearly Trump likes the feeling that he's a strong man capable of exerting his will on the world by way of military force. So that played a role too.

            It's probably important not to imagine reasoning that seems complicated or nuanced, because Trump doesn't do complicated or nuanced.

            Education is extremely important.

            RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #1315

              ISW summaries of both the Iran and Ukraine wars are worth following.

              Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Horace

                No strong opinion about Trump's motivations. The fact that Rubio said right after the start that Israel said it was going with or without the US, and that played a role, seems feasible. Even if he did walk that back at some point. Not sure how or why he would have said that if there's wasn't some truth to it.

                Clearly Trump likes the feeling that he's a strong man capable of exerting his will on the world by way of military force. So that played a role too.

                It's probably important not to imagine reasoning that seems complicated or nuanced, because Trump doesn't do complicated or nuanced.

                RenaudaR Offline
                RenaudaR Offline
                Renauda
                wrote last edited by
                #1316

                @Horace

                Clearly Trump likes the feeling that he's a strong man capable of exerting his will on the world by way of military force. So that played a role too.

                Parse that one amongst historyโ€™s rubbish bin of demagogues and tyrants.

                Elbows up!

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                  #1317

                  Interesting. But could give him someone to blame if, as it looks now, we take the L.

                  Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1318

                    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/everyone-assumes-america-can-just-bomb-iran-again-whenever-it-wants-it-can-t/ar-AA24VIiG?cvpid=891ce15cf02b4ebedf103f279d185f76

                    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." โ€” Thomas Sowell

                    AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Mik

                      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/everyone-assumes-america-can-just-bomb-iran-again-whenever-it-wants-it-can-t/ar-AA24VIiG?cvpid=891ce15cf02b4ebedf103f279d185f76

                      AxtremusA Offline
                      AxtremusA Offline
                      Axtremus
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1319

                      @Mik said:

                      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/everyone-assumes-america-can-just-bomb-iran-again-whenever-it-wants-it-can-t/ar-AA24VIiG?cvpid=891ce15cf02b4ebedf103f279d185f76

                      There goes the "Best post in a long time on TNCR." ๐Ÿคท

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        AndyD
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1320

                        ๐Ÿ˜„ I'm pretty certain the West's military-industrial complex is up to the job of replacing whatever is used quicker than any of us imagine; and also of prioritising production, e.g. of useful new arms such as long range drones.

                        1 Reply Last reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better ๐Ÿ’—

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups