Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Daddy can I PLEASE have a pardon?

Daddy can I PLEASE have a pardon?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
14 Posts 4 Posters 156 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    Same logic works for kids btw

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      Pretty pretty please????

      Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        Almost makes me want to shift all my accounts into super low risk mode. Let the recession crash, then buy back in.

        But time in the market beats timing the market..........

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          Problem with timing the market is you gotta be right twice. When to sell, and when to get back in.

          Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            I mean, if you time the top, you don't have to time the bottom to benefit. The second timing only increases or decreases the benefit.

            The real issue is that a high market is not the indicator of a top that it intuitively seems like it should be.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              Brings to mind a funny irony presented by Buffet over the past many years. One of the more oft-repeated Buffetisms is "time in the market beats timing the market". Meanwhile, his massive cash pile is him, timing the market. Do as I say, not as I do...

              And his advice to just invest in the S&P 500 because individual stock picks are like gambling against the casino, has been garbage for 20 years now.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                #11

                Funny though the S&P500 has beaten Berkshire Hathaway over the last 20 years.

                Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Offline
                  HoraceH Offline
                  Horace
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  Yes BRK has been a garbage stock for a long time. And it would have been way worse if Buffet hadn't heavily invested in an individual stock, AAPL, about 10 years ago.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Offline
                    HoraceH Offline
                    Horace
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    ChatGPT estimates that BRK's stock price would be 15-30% lower had Buffet kept in t-bills what he invested in AAPL.

                    Education is extremely important.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      Yeah he would have done much worse in t-bills than in stocks. That’s true over probably any 20 year period in history.

                      Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                      1 Reply Last reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups