Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.2k Posts 20 Posters 112.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RenaudaR Renauda

    @taiwan_girl

    Where did you find that op-Ed?

    jodiJ Offline
    jodiJ Offline
    jodi
    wrote last edited by
    #1057

    @Renauda said:

    @taiwan_girl

    Where did you find that op-Ed?

    Daniel DePetris, Chicago Tribune

    1 Reply Last reply
    • RenaudaR Offline
      RenaudaR Offline
      Renauda
      wrote last edited by
      #1058

      Thanks, Jodi

      Elbows up!

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by
        #1059

        Anyone listen? Summary?

        Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote last edited by
          #1060

          A pastiche of the last four weeks of Truth Social rants and scrums with the press. Clear as mud. More smoke and mirrors.

          Elbows up!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #1061

            Heh.

            Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #1062

              An oil analyst I follow posted ‘Hormuz closed until
              May, folks.’

              Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

              RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                An oil analyst I follow posted ‘Hormuz closed until
                May, folks.’

                RenaudaR Offline
                RenaudaR Offline
                Renauda
                wrote last edited by
                #1063

                @jon-nyc

                I think your oil analyst might be an optimist.

                Elbows up!

                1 Reply Last reply
                • RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote last edited by
                  #1064

                  For Iran it’s simply a matter of waiting Trump out and enduring in the meantime.

                  For years, Tehran has operated on a simple premise: survival against a superior military power constitutes success. In its enduring confrontation with Israel and the US, Tehran has always believed that conflict with one would draw in the other.

                  "Still standing" is not a fallback outcome - it is the objective. One month into the war, the Islamic Republic's command structures still function, its state apparatus holds, and its deterrent, though degraded, is not broken.

                  https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq8wzyz998xo

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • Tom-KT Offline
                    Tom-KT Offline
                    Tom-K
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1065

                    ^^^^
                    Waiting is a two edged sword. The US doesn't necessarily have to "win" or have regime change to keep Iran in submission. The US can merely bomb Iran into the stone age on a regular basis, maybe every ten years or so and let nature take its course. And through bad planning and back luck Iran is going through an drought of Biblical proportions that may do more damage to Iran than all the bombs put together and as we saw there is a significant undercurrent of hostility to the severe Islamicism of the people running the country. America should drop its bombs and then see what happens.

                    Ego similis habere bonum et non curat nunquam accipere malum.

                    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                    • Tom-KT Tom-K

                      ^^^^
                      Waiting is a two edged sword. The US doesn't necessarily have to "win" or have regime change to keep Iran in submission. The US can merely bomb Iran into the stone age on a regular basis, maybe every ten years or so and let nature take its course. And through bad planning and back luck Iran is going through an drought of Biblical proportions that may do more damage to Iran than all the bombs put together and as we saw there is a significant undercurrent of hostility to the severe Islamicism of the people running the country. America should drop its bombs and then see what happens.

                      RenaudaR Offline
                      RenaudaR Offline
                      Renauda
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1066

                      @Tom-K

                      America should drop its bombs and then see what happens.

                      It’s not so much what happens in Iran as a result of the bombs, it’s the unacceptable cost of the collateral damage to every supply chain and national economy beyond Iran’s borders that a campaign of bombing Iran “back to the stone ages” that matters.

                      Elbows up!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • MikM Offline
                        MikM Offline
                        Mik
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1067

                        We can learn a thing or two from Iran it seems. Also, watch the video in the article about the F-47. Impressive.

                        https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/us-fields-a-low-cost-drone-modeled-on-iran-s-shahed-design/ar-AA201Zsn

                        "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • bachophileB Offline
                          bachophileB Offline
                          bachophile
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1068

                          American F15 E strike eagle downed SW Iran. Two crew ejected.

                          Search and rescue underway.

                          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote last edited by
                            #1069

                            IMG_1678.jpeg

                            Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • bachophileB bachophile

                              American F15 E strike eagle downed SW Iran. Two crew ejected.

                              Search and rescue underway.

                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote last edited by
                              #1070

                              @bachophile said:

                              American F15 E strike eagle downed SW Iran. Two crew ejected.

                              Search and rescue underway.

                              Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • X Offline
                                X Offline
                                xenon
                                wrote last edited by
                                #1071

                                That’s good news. Any word on if there was another crew member?

                                Between Iran doing what they’ve done, being pissed off and Hegseth proclaiming “no quarter” - this is not good.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • bachophileB Offline
                                  bachophileB Offline
                                  bachophile
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #1072

                                  The IRG published on tv a prize of $50000 bounty for any pilot. The place the plane went down is a very poor area and the kind of money is millions for us. Just praying the other is found soon.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • MikM Offline
                                    MikM Offline
                                    Mik
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #1073

                                    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                                    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • MikM Mik

                                      RenaudaR Offline
                                      RenaudaR Offline
                                      Renauda
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #1074

                                      @Mik

                                      I get what Thorne is trying to explain and reason away in his tortured post factum analysis. It however misses the mark on two important aspects.

                                      The first being that it was the US itself following WWII that wanted its Western European allies to remain individually militarily weak but collectively allied with the US under NATO against the USSR and its satellites. Essentially the US would become the alternative major continental power to the Soviet Union, the position previously held by either France or Germany. Britain was never really part of the formula as it was never a continental power but rather a naval power with greatly diminished power projection abilities following WWII.

                                      The second being, there is no way the Trump Adminstration would reason or rationalize its current policies and plans under the guidance of Hegelian historicism. Like John Bolton, I am of the mind there is no grand plan or strategy governing Trump’s thoughts, pronouncements or actions let alone policy objectives extending beyond a week or so. In Trump’s mind a Hegelian dialectic would probably be something to relieve a gastrointestinal complaint.

                                      Elbows up!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      👍
                                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                                        #1075

                                        Yeah politicians generally play checkers not chess, especially in democracies. That is when they’re not eating the pieces.

                                        Also there’s what’s known as the ‘myth of energy independence’. As if we can sit on our shores with $40 oil while huge swathes of the world just go without or pay 4x that.

                                        Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nyc
                                          wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                                          #1076

                                          That said his outline of what’s happening seems correct. It’s what ending our role as a global superpower looks like.

                                          Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                          RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups