Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Venezuelan Oil Thread

The Venezuelan Oil Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
46 Posts 11 Posters 1.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    said in The Venezuelan Oil Thread:

    We’re already in fool me twice territory.

    This was during the meeting with Trump yesterday:

    Darren Woods, who leads the largest U.S. oil company, Exxon Mobil, was especially blunt during a televised portion of the meeting.

    “We’ve had our assets seized there twice, and so you can imagine to re-enter a third time would require some pretty significant changes,” he said. “Today it’s uninvestable.”

    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
    #37

    said in The Venezuelan Oil Thread:

    Darren Woods, who leads the largest U.S. oil company, Exxon Mobil, was especially blunt during a televised portion of the meeting.

    “We’ve had our assets seized there twice, and so you can imagine to re-enter a third time would require some pretty significant changes,” he said. “Today it’s uninvestable.”

    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #38

      Trump is shielding the cash from selling seized oil by putting it in Qatari banks.

      Again he’s shielding the Venezuelan assets from Us creditors, saying, and I quote, he was “not going to look at what people lost in the past, because it was their fault.”

      The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote on last edited by
        #39

        To be fair, there isn't a swamp in Qatar.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on last edited by
          #40

          To be fair, I am not sure this is a bad thing. From my undestand, the money (I think about USD$500MM so far) is to be used directly to Venezuela for humanitarian and small business aid.

          RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
            #41

            That would surprise me. A little I would expect. But all or even most of it?

            The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

              To be fair, I am not sure this is a bad thing. From my undestand, the money (I think about USD$500MM so far) is to be used directly to Venezuela for humanitarian and small business aid.

              RenaudaR Offline
              RenaudaR Offline
              Renauda
              wrote on last edited by
              #42

              @taiwan_girl said in The Venezuelan Oil Thread:

              To be fair, I am not sure this is a bad thing. From my undestand, the money (I think about USD$500MM so far) is to be used directly to Venezuela for humanitarian and small business aid.

              Be rest assured Venezuela will only net a portion of any sums. The boss will skim his due first.

              Elbows up!

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote on last edited by
                #43

                This seems imbalanced given that he first shut down USAID.

                "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Offline
                  MikM Offline
                  Mik
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #44

                  https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/here-s-who-is-likely-to-profit-from-trump-s-venezuela-takeover/ar-AA1Ul5BY?cvpid=dc2bd62789e64ba0b79ec41418a17301

                  "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                  RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Mik

                    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/here-s-who-is-likely-to-profit-from-trump-s-venezuela-takeover/ar-AA1Ul5BY?cvpid=dc2bd62789e64ba0b79ec41418a17301

                    RenaudaR Offline
                    RenaudaR Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #45

                    @Mik

                    The list ought to have included Halliburton alongside SLB.

                    Also, there are deposits of light and medium crude outside the Orinoco Belt area. Some in the Lake Maricaibo region but elsewhere as well. That wildcatter, Hamm, could make tons of money in short pay back timeframe if he could latch onto some of those reservoirs.

                    Elbows up!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • AxtremusA Offline
                      AxtremusA Offline
                      Axtremus
                      wrote last edited by
                      #46

                      https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/13/us/politics/trump-seized-oil-tankers-cost.html

                      The Oil Tankers Trump Seized Are Costing the U.S. Millions of Dollars
                      ... the cost of maintaining just one aging ship has already reached $47 million [in three months].

                      And the oil cannot be sold yet pending litigation.

                      1 Reply Last reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups