Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Invading Greenland - suicide.

Invading Greenland - suicide.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
74 Posts 11 Posters 1.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Offline
    MikM Offline
    Mik
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Do you honestly think you are changing anyone’s mind? As awful as he is, he’s still a better president than she would have been.

    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
    • LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      You’re right, @axtremus … The alternative would likely have surrendered to Greenland…

      The Brad

      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Mik

        Do you honestly think you are changing anyone’s mind? As awful as he is, he’s still a better president than she would have been.

        Doctor PhibesD Online
        Doctor PhibesD Online
        Doctor Phibes
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        @Mik said in Invading Greenland - suicide.:

        As awful as he is, he’s still a better president than she would have been.

        No, he's not. But it's irrelevant.

        I was only joking

        1 Reply Last reply
        • RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote on last edited by Renauda
          #25

          In my reality the alternative would have been named Nikki Haley. None of this constant uncertainty and chaos in trade, foreign or domestic policy would be happening.

          No one can say she didn’t warn the world of what this maniacal demogogue would unleash if put back in office

          Elbows up!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Offline
            MikM Offline
            Mik
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            I was Team Nikki too. Smart, capable, backbone and some sense of restraint.

            "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

            1 Reply Last reply
            • RenaudaR Offline
              RenaudaR Offline
              Renauda
              wrote on last edited by Renauda
              #27

              Principled and a genuine statesman.

              Elbows up!

              1 Reply Last reply
              • Doctor PhibesD Online
                Doctor PhibesD Online
                Doctor Phibes
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                Let's be honest, the fucking meteor would be doing a better job at this point.

                I was only joking

                1 Reply Last reply
                • RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote on last edited by Renauda
                  #29

                  Indeed. Instead we all appear doomed to have to endure the near future (and beyond) with this jackass of the apocalypse.

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • RenaudaR Offline
                    RenaudaR Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote on last edited by Renauda
                    #30

                    Paul Krugman quote from Substack:

                    · A tariff to promote territorial expansion is clearly illegal, under any sane interpretation of U.S. trade law. This is on the Supreme Court, which is obviously dithering while the world burns

                    · Trump thinks, or at least wants to believe, that tariffs are a Veg-O-Matic policy that can accomplish all goals. They slice! They dice! They eliminate budget deficits! They reindustrialize! They intimidate foreigners!

                    Elbows up!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      SCOTUS really needs to pull it's finger out. What worries me is where said finger might be currently inserted.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        I trust that SCOTUS is populated by relatively decent people.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • Tom-KT Offline
                            Tom-KT Offline
                            Tom-K
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            Well if Trump takes Greenland I feel sorry for the next President of the US that will have to give Greenland back.

                            Flushing the toilet is like practicing the piano; you just cannot go too long without doing it.--Axtremus

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • MikM Offline
                              MikM Offline
                              Mik
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              All this crap about making territories into US property is just idiotic.

                              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • RenaudaR Offline
                                RenaudaR Offline
                                Renauda
                                wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                #36

                                Read and reflect. Rosenberg gets it. The Kremlin has nothing but derision and mockery directed at Trump and his minions:

                                In an astonishing article, the Russian government paper is full of praise for Trump and critical of European leaders who oppose a US annexation of Greenland.

                                "Europe does not need the American greatness that Trump is promoting. Brussels is counting on 'drowning' the US president in the midterm congressional elections, on preventing him from concluding the greatest deal of his life."

                                "Greatest deal"? The reporter explains what he means. I have to keep reminding myself I am reading the Russian government newspaper, not a pro-Trump publication in America.

                                "With Greenland, the US becomes the second largest country in the world after Russia, surpassing Canada in area. For Americans, that's on par with such planetary events as the abolition of slavery by Abraham Lincoln in 1862 or the territorial conquests of the Napoleonic Wars.

                                "If, thanks to Trump, Greenland becomes part of America…for sure the American people will not forget such an achievement."

                                Then a message, presumably dictated word for word from the tyrant Putin himself:

                                ”It is dangerous for the American president to back down over Greenland. This would weaken the position of the Republican Party in the midterm elections and likely result in a Democrat majority on Capitol Hill with the ensuing consequences for Trump. Whereas a rapid annexation of Greenland before the elections can change this political trend."

                                https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c17zpvkddpzo

                                Elbows up!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • MikM Offline
                                  MikM Offline
                                  Mik
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  Yes, but you’re not wildly impaired and bored. Bad combination.

                                  "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                                  RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • MikM Mik

                                    Yes, but you’re not wildly impaired and bored. Bad combination.

                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    Renauda
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #38

                                    @Mik said in Invading Greenland - suicide.:

                                    Yes, but you’re not wildly impaired and bored. Bad combination.

                                    Especially when that combination gets behind the wheel and goes for a joy ride.

                                    Elbows up!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • AxtremusA Away
                                      AxtremusA Away
                                      Axtremus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/20/us/politics/republicans-trump-greenland.html

                                      A small but growing group of Republicans in Congress is expressing openness to President Trump’s increasingly explicit push to acquire Greenland, along with his desire to punish European allies who resist the idea.

                                      ... with the president stepping up his threats and showing no sign of backing down, Republicans across the ideological spectrum are increasingly finding ways to defend or justify his threats — or embrace them altogether.

                                      taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                        https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/20/us/politics/republicans-trump-greenland.html

                                        A small but growing group of Republicans in Congress is expressing openness to President Trump’s increasingly explicit push to acquire Greenland, along with his desire to punish European allies who resist the idea.

                                        ... with the president stepping up his threats and showing no sign of backing down, Republicans across the ideological spectrum are increasingly finding ways to defend or justify his threats — or embrace them altogether.

                                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                                        taiwan_girl
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #40

                                        @Axtremus Is this a surprise?

                                        (I have to admit that I was initially surprised that the Republicans so easily "rolled over" for some of President Trumps more outrageous ideas, but now I am surprised if any actually stand up to him.

                                        I suppose it will depend on what happens to the 2026 elections. If the Republics get beat very badly, then there may be more willing to stand up.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • AxtremusA Away
                                          AxtremusA Away
                                          Axtremus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #41

                                          Not a surprise to me. It has been very obvious to me, for a long time, that the Republican Party has capitulated to Trump. Any former Republicans who stood up to Trump are just that, former (or retiring) Republicans.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups