Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Invading Greenland - suicide.

Invading Greenland - suicide.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
72 Posts 11 Posters 1.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
    #17

    And going to 25% in June.

    He’s going to end his presidency with a global boycott of American goods if he keeps this shit up.

    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      Imagine arguing with a straight face that Congress seriously intended to give the president the power to impose "emergency" tariffs on imports from US treaty allies so he could forcibly acquire the territory of one of those allies.

      For fuck sake, scotus, end this next week.

      The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        And going to 25% in June.

        He’s going to end his presidency with a global boycott of American goods if he keeps this shit up.

        RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote last edited by Renauda
        #19

        @jon-nyc said in Invading Greenland - suicide.:

        He’s going to end his presidency with a global boycott of American goods if he keeps this shit up.

        Elbows up Nato!

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Mik

          He goes for my ancestral homeland and it's fighting time.

          AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          @Mik said in Invading Greenland - suicide.:

          He goes for my ancestral homeland and it's fighting time.

          Wait a minute ... whose side will you be fighting for?

          1 Reply Last reply
          • AxtremusA Offline
            AxtremusA Offline
            Axtremus
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            The alternative would not have tried to take Greenland.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              Do you honestly think you are changing anyone’s mind? As awful as he is, he’s still a better president than she would have been.

              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

              Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
              • LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                You’re right, @axtremus … The alternative would likely have surrendered to Greenland…

                The Brad

                1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Mik

                  Do you honestly think you are changing anyone’s mind? As awful as he is, he’s still a better president than she would have been.

                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  @Mik said in Invading Greenland - suicide.:

                  As awful as he is, he’s still a better president than she would have been.

                  No, he's not. But it's irrelevant.

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • RenaudaR Offline
                    RenaudaR Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote last edited by Renauda
                    #25

                    In my reality the alternative would have been named Nikki Haley. None of this constant uncertainty and chaos in trade, foreign or domestic policy would be happening.

                    No one can say she didn’t warn the world of what this maniacal demogogue would unleash if put back in office

                    Elbows up!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      I was Team Nikki too. Smart, capable, backbone and some sense of restraint.

                      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • RenaudaR Offline
                        RenaudaR Offline
                        Renauda
                        wrote last edited by Renauda
                        #27

                        Principled and a genuine statesman.

                        Elbows up!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor Phibes
                          wrote last edited by
                          #28

                          Let's be honest, the fucking meteor would be doing a better job at this point.

                          I was only joking

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • RenaudaR Offline
                            RenaudaR Offline
                            Renauda
                            wrote last edited by Renauda
                            #29

                            Indeed. Instead we all appear doomed to have to endure the near future (and beyond) with this jackass of the apocalypse.

                            Elbows up!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • RenaudaR Offline
                              RenaudaR Offline
                              Renauda
                              wrote last edited by Renauda
                              #30

                              Paul Krugman quote from Substack:

                              · A tariff to promote territorial expansion is clearly illegal, under any sane interpretation of U.S. trade law. This is on the Supreme Court, which is obviously dithering while the world burns

                              · Trump thinks, or at least wants to believe, that tariffs are a Veg-O-Matic policy that can accomplish all goals. They slice! They dice! They eliminate budget deficits! They reindustrialize! They intimidate foreigners!

                              Elbows up!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor Phibes
                                wrote last edited by
                                #31

                                SCOTUS really needs to pull it's finger out. What worries me is where said finger might be currently inserted.

                                I was only joking

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • HoraceH Offline
                                  HoraceH Offline
                                  Horace
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #32

                                  I trust that SCOTUS is populated by relatively decent people.

                                  Education is extremely important.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #33

                                    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • Tom-KT Offline
                                      Tom-KT Offline
                                      Tom-K
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #34

                                      Well if Trump takes Greenland I feel sorry for the next President of the US that will have to give Greenland back.

                                      Flushing the toilet is like practicing the piano; you just cannot go too long without doing it.--Axtremus

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • MikM Offline
                                        MikM Offline
                                        Mik
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #35

                                        All this crap about making territories into US property is just idiotic.

                                        "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • RenaudaR Offline
                                          RenaudaR Offline
                                          Renauda
                                          wrote last edited by Renauda
                                          #36

                                          Read and reflect. Rosenberg gets it. The Kremlin has nothing but derision and mockery directed at Trump and his minions:

                                          In an astonishing article, the Russian government paper is full of praise for Trump and critical of European leaders who oppose a US annexation of Greenland.

                                          "Europe does not need the American greatness that Trump is promoting. Brussels is counting on 'drowning' the US president in the midterm congressional elections, on preventing him from concluding the greatest deal of his life."

                                          "Greatest deal"? The reporter explains what he means. I have to keep reminding myself I am reading the Russian government newspaper, not a pro-Trump publication in America.

                                          "With Greenland, the US becomes the second largest country in the world after Russia, surpassing Canada in area. For Americans, that's on par with such planetary events as the abolition of slavery by Abraham Lincoln in 1862 or the territorial conquests of the Napoleonic Wars.

                                          "If, thanks to Trump, Greenland becomes part of America…for sure the American people will not forget such an achievement."

                                          Then a message, presumably dictated word for word from the tyrant Putin himself:

                                          ”It is dangerous for the American president to back down over Greenland. This would weaken the position of the Republican Party in the midterm elections and likely result in a Democrat majority on Capitol Hill with the ensuing consequences for Trump. Whereas a rapid annexation of Greenland before the elections can change this political trend."

                                          https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c17zpvkddpzo

                                          Elbows up!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups