Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Shutdown Length

Shutdown Length

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
71 Posts 12 Posters 1.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RenaudaR Renauda

    @Horace said in Shutdown Length:

    @Doctor-Phibes said in Shutdown Length:

    @Horace said in Shutdown Length:

    Neville Chamberlain wanted to give in to Hitler.

    Actually, Neville Chamberlain declared war on Hitler

    Oh. I thought he was used as a universal cautionary tale against appeasement of bad guys. But in a dunkaholics anonymous meeting, he’s the guy who declared war on the bad guys

    Not a universal cautionary tale but a simplistic interpretation of the historical facts that led to the Munich Agreement. Suffice to say that Chamberlain was left with a choice between dealing with Hitler alone as France would not involve itself militarily with Britain to stop the latter from invading Czechoslovakia, or inviting Stalin and the Red Army into Central Europe to stop Hitler that would inevitably lead to an even greater predicament of how to get Stalin and the Red Army out of the heart Europe once Hitler was pacified. Chamberlain chose the only rational option open to him under the circumstances.

    And no, this thesis did not arise from a dunkaholics anonymous meeting.

    HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote last edited by
    #57

    @Renauda said in Shutdown Length:

    @Horace said in Shutdown Length:

    @Doctor-Phibes said in Shutdown Length:

    @Horace said in Shutdown Length:

    Neville Chamberlain wanted to give in to Hitler.

    Actually, Neville Chamberlain declared war on Hitler

    Oh. I thought he was used as a universal cautionary tale against appeasement of bad guys. But in a dunkaholics anonymous meeting, he’s the guy who declared war on the bad guys

    Not a universal cautionary tale but a simplistic interpretation of the historical facts that led to the Munich Agreement. Suffice to say that Chamberlain was left with a choice between dealing with Hitler alone as France would not involve itself militarily with Britain to stop the latter from invading Czechoslovakia, or inviting Stalin and the Red Army into Central Europe to stop Hitler that would inevitably lead to an even greater predicament of how to get Stalin and the Red Army out of the heart Europe once Hitler was pacified. Chamberlain chose the only rational option open to him under the circumstances.

    And no, this thesis did not arise from a dunkaholics anonymous meeting.

    Yes, a quick search for mentions of Chamberlain on this board establish that you and Phibes are both acquainted with the historical accounts that push back against Chamberlain's bad rap.

    Mr NYC on the other hand is yet another vector of the historical misinformation, which my parody of a bluesky poster unfortunately fell for. Neither you nor Phibes pushed back on that one, but for all dunks there is a time and place.

    https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/post/346708

    Education is extremely important.

    RenaudaR Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      @Renauda said in Shutdown Length:

      @Horace said in Shutdown Length:

      @Doctor-Phibes said in Shutdown Length:

      @Horace said in Shutdown Length:

      Neville Chamberlain wanted to give in to Hitler.

      Actually, Neville Chamberlain declared war on Hitler

      Oh. I thought he was used as a universal cautionary tale against appeasement of bad guys. But in a dunkaholics anonymous meeting, he’s the guy who declared war on the bad guys

      Not a universal cautionary tale but a simplistic interpretation of the historical facts that led to the Munich Agreement. Suffice to say that Chamberlain was left with a choice between dealing with Hitler alone as France would not involve itself militarily with Britain to stop the latter from invading Czechoslovakia, or inviting Stalin and the Red Army into Central Europe to stop Hitler that would inevitably lead to an even greater predicament of how to get Stalin and the Red Army out of the heart Europe once Hitler was pacified. Chamberlain chose the only rational option open to him under the circumstances.

      And no, this thesis did not arise from a dunkaholics anonymous meeting.

      Yes, a quick search for mentions of Chamberlain on this board establish that you and Phibes are both acquainted with the historical accounts that push back against Chamberlain's bad rap.

      Mr NYC on the other hand is yet another vector of the historical misinformation, which my parody of a bluesky poster unfortunately fell for. Neither you nor Phibes pushed back on that one, but for all dunks there is a time and place.

      https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/post/346708

      RenaudaR Offline
      RenaudaR Offline
      Renauda
      wrote last edited by
      #58

      @Horace

      So what’s your point?

      Elbows up!

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by
        #59

        As Churchill so memorably said he chose dishonor but got war anyway. Not sure how to save his reputation from that.

        If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

        Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
        • RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote last edited by Renauda
          #60

          @jon-nyc

          Churchill was a Francophile and to the very end always believed France would do the right thing. Chamberlain on the other hand was a realist and knew France, despite the size and strength of its army, would not lift a finger to come to Czechoslovakia’s aid. The only other continental army remaining other than Germany’s, was the Red Army. Stalin was most willing to intervene on the side of Czechoslovakia provided either France or Britain would also mobilize against the Nazis. While the Royal Navy could have sailed against the kriegsmarine there was no British army to speak of in 1938 to even deploy onto the continent let alone march on Germany from the west.

          Elbows up!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • N Away
            N Away
            NobodySock
            wrote last edited by NobodySock
            #61

            The Red Army sure seems to have a hard time beating up the little guy when they want to take over their country. ukraine is Finland v2. If i am Nato i want both of them on my team. Tough mofos.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Horace

              @Renauda said in Shutdown Length:

              @Horace said in Shutdown Length:

              @Doctor-Phibes said in Shutdown Length:

              @Horace said in Shutdown Length:

              Neville Chamberlain wanted to give in to Hitler.

              Actually, Neville Chamberlain declared war on Hitler

              Oh. I thought he was used as a universal cautionary tale against appeasement of bad guys. But in a dunkaholics anonymous meeting, he’s the guy who declared war on the bad guys

              Not a universal cautionary tale but a simplistic interpretation of the historical facts that led to the Munich Agreement. Suffice to say that Chamberlain was left with a choice between dealing with Hitler alone as France would not involve itself militarily with Britain to stop the latter from invading Czechoslovakia, or inviting Stalin and the Red Army into Central Europe to stop Hitler that would inevitably lead to an even greater predicament of how to get Stalin and the Red Army out of the heart Europe once Hitler was pacified. Chamberlain chose the only rational option open to him under the circumstances.

              And no, this thesis did not arise from a dunkaholics anonymous meeting.

              Yes, a quick search for mentions of Chamberlain on this board establish that you and Phibes are both acquainted with the historical accounts that push back against Chamberlain's bad rap.

              Mr NYC on the other hand is yet another vector of the historical misinformation, which my parody of a bluesky poster unfortunately fell for. Neither you nor Phibes pushed back on that one, but for all dunks there is a time and place.

              https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/post/346708

              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote last edited by
              #62

              @Horace said in Shutdown Length:

              which my parody of a bluesky poster unfortunately fell for. Neither you nor Phibes pushed back on that one, but for all dunks there is a time and place.

              I have literally never read a single Bluesky post, so the parody went over my head unnoticed.

              I was only joking

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                As Churchill so memorably said he chose dishonor but got war anyway. Not sure how to save his reputation from that.

                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor Phibes
                wrote last edited by
                #63

                @jon-nyc said in Shutdown Length:

                As Churchill so memorably said he chose dishonor but got war anyway. Not sure how to save his reputation from that.

                IMHO Ramsey McDonald and Stanley Baldwin should bear more responsibility for the mess than Chamberlain. Both McDonald and Baldwin seem to be mostly forgotten in these discussions nowadays, but Chamberlain really inherited the shit sandwich that they had carefully put together whilst desperately trying to avoid conflict in the 30's.

                I was only joking

                1 Reply Last reply
                • N Away
                  N Away
                  NobodySock
                  wrote last edited by
                  #64

                  How did Germany get away without a peep from the WWI winners, building up that military machine violating the terms of armistice? It couldnt have been a mystery. Those films always make my jaw drop with the size of their army parading down the streets

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #65

                    Had the French army simply begun mobilization when the Germans marched into the Ruhr they would have retreated with their tail between their legs and there’s a strong possibility it would have been the end of Hitler.

                    If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

                    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      Had the French army simply begun mobilization when the Germans marched into the Ruhr they would have retreated with their tail between their legs and there’s a strong possibility it would have been the end of Hitler.

                      RenaudaR Offline
                      RenaudaR Offline
                      Renauda
                      wrote last edited by Renauda
                      #66

                      @jon-nyc

                      True.

                      Elbows up!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote last edited by
                        #67

                        Ah, the rose tented mirrored sunglasses of historical after-knowledge.

                        I was only joking

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote last edited by Renauda
                          #68

                          Indeed, if only France had done something in 1938. Together with the USSR Hitler would have been preempted from attacking Czechoslovakia and Josef Stalin would have obtained the Czech armaments industry (a prize Hitler desperately needed for his war plans) and established Soviet power in the middle of Europe without so much as firing a shot at anyone other than the Poles whose territory he would have had to cross to get to Czechoslovakia.

                          Elbows up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor Phibes
                            wrote last edited by Doctor Phibes
                            #69

                            If only they hadn't fucked everything up in 1919 and helped Germany recover along with the rest of Europe....Hitler could have spent his latter years painting people's bedrooms.

                            I was only joking

                            RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                              If only they hadn't fucked everything up in 1919 and helped Germany recover along with the rest of Europe....Hitler could have spent his latter years painting people's bedrooms.

                              RenaudaR Offline
                              RenaudaR Offline
                              Renauda
                              wrote last edited by Renauda
                              #70

                              @Doctor-Phibes

                              Yes I think we should have a good dunk on David Lloyd George, George Clemenceau and above all, Woodrow Wilson. While at it we can also dunk on Joseph P. Kennedy because we can.

                              Elbows up!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor Phibes
                                wrote last edited by
                                #71

                                Don't forget George Washington. If he hadn't bankrupted the French monarchy there wouldn't have been a revolution, and we'd all be happily sipping tea in Boston.

                                I was only joking

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups