Survey Sez...
-
Who exactly has said that here?
@Doctor-Phibes said in Survey Sez...:
Who exactly has said that here?
I did wish Trumpigula ill and good riddance on 25 February in this post:
https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/36921/trump-s-bruise/7?_=1744123518705
I meant it then and still feel that way. I don’t forgive any foreign leader who threatens to annex my country.
I do however agree with Jon’s statement regarding Vance. He is every bit, if not more repugnant than the old bastard presently in the occupying Oval Office.
Elbows up!
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Survey Sez...:
Who exactly has said that here?
I did wish Trumpigula ill and good riddance on 25 February in this post:
https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/36921/trump-s-bruise/7?_=1744123518705
I meant it then and still feel that way. I don’t forgive any foreign leader who threatens to annex my country.
I do however agree with Jon’s statement regarding Vance. He is every bit, if not more repugnant than the old bastard presently in the occupying Oval Office.
@Renauda said in Survey Sez...:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Survey Sez...:
Who exactly has said that here?
I did wish Trumpigula ill and good riddance on 25 February in this post:
https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/36921/trump-s-bruise/7?_=1744123518705
I meant it then and still feel that way. I don’t forgive any foreign leader who threatens to annex my country.
I do however agree with Jon’s statement regarding Vance. He is every bit, if not more repugnant than the old bastard presently in the occupying Oval Office.
But there's no way he would have said most of the stupid things Trump has said that make you angry. "Canada will be the 51st state" might have been parroted by Vance (I don't know this to be true, and I doubt it), but he would never have thought to say it. Vance's rhetoric would be far less inflammatory, and I doubt his policies would be as dumb either. He's bound to support the boss currently, but I'd be way more comfortable with Vance than I am with Trump.
-
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
-
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
-
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
Could you elaborate? What doesn't have a chance?
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
Could you elaborate? What doesn't have a chance?
@Horace said in Survey Sez...:
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
Could you elaborate? What doesn't have a chance?
Vance being more capable of implementing Trump ideas. He may be more articulate, but I don’t think he has the cojones to pull off what Trump does.
Plus, I don’t think Vance lasts beyond the midterms. Vance is a bit too much of a true believer.
The Brad
-
Vance has zero charisma. He's annoying to look at.
I know this shouldn't matter, but really....
-
@Horace said in Survey Sez...:
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
Could you elaborate? What doesn't have a chance?
Vance being more capable of implementing Trump ideas. He may be more articulate, but I don’t think he has the cojones to pull off what Trump does.
Plus, I don’t think Vance lasts beyond the midterms. Vance is a bit too much of a true believer.
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@Horace said in Survey Sez...:
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
Could you elaborate? What doesn't have a chance?
Vance being more capable of implementing Trump ideas. He may be more articulate, but I don’t think he has the cojones to pull off what Trump does.
I don't think he would try. I think the tariffs go away if Trump goes away, at the latest by the next administration.
Plus, I don’t think Vance lasts beyond the midterms. Vance is a bit too much of a true believer.
True believer in what?
Education is extremely important.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Survey Sez...:
Who exactly has said that here?
I did wish Trumpigula ill and good riddance on 25 February in this post:
https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/36921/trump-s-bruise/7?_=1744123518705
I meant it then and still feel that way. I don’t forgive any foreign leader who threatens to annex my country.
I do however agree with Jon’s statement regarding Vance. He is every bit, if not more repugnant than the old bastard presently in the occupying Oval Office.
@Renauda said in Survey Sez...:
123518705I don’t forgive any foreign leader who threatens to annex my country.
I definitely see your point there. People have gone to war for lesser things. In the US we kind of look at annexing Canada as kind of just Trump being Trump but I can see where those being annexed might take it very seriously. And rightly so.
-
@Horace said in Survey Sez...:
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
Could you elaborate? What doesn't have a chance?
Vance being more capable of implementing Trump ideas. He may be more articulate, but I don’t think he has the cojones to pull off what Trump does.
Plus, I don’t think Vance lasts beyond the midterms. Vance is a bit too much of a true believer.
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
Vance is a bit too much of a true believer.I sort of believe that all of these guys are just putting in the 9 to 5. They are doing what they are paid to do, for the fame, money and power. I don't know really what Vance is like, but I can tell you that guy that's the Secretary of State isn't the Marco Rubio that's been hanging around Florida politics for that last 20 years.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
Vance is a bit too much of a true believer.I sort of believe that all of these guys are just putting in the 9 to 5. They are doing what they are paid to do, for the fame, money and power. I don't know really what Vance is like, but I can tell you that guy that's the Secretary of State isn't the Marco Rubio that's been hanging around Florida politics for that last 20 years.
@Tom-K said in Survey Sez...:
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
Vance is a bit too much of a true believer.I sort of believe that all of these guys are just putting in the 9 to 5. They are doing what they are paid to do, for the fame, money and power. I don't know really what Vance is like, but I can tell you that guy that's the Secretary of State isn't the Marco Rubio that's been hanging around Florida politics for that last 20 years.
Yes, he is. The guy on the news isn’t, but the guy working with the staff at State and the diplomats? Absolutely is. And that’s coming from 2 moderate democrats Diplomats. They say they are grateful as hell for him.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@Horace said in Survey Sez...:
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
Could you elaborate? What doesn't have a chance?
Vance being more capable of implementing Trump ideas. He may be more articulate, but I don’t think he has the cojones to pull off what Trump does.
I don't think he would try. I think the tariffs go away if Trump goes away, at the latest by the next administration.
Plus, I don’t think Vance lasts beyond the midterms. Vance is a bit too much of a true believer.
True believer in what?
@Horace said in Survey Sez...:
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@Horace said in Survey Sez...:
@LuFins-Dad said in Survey Sez...:
@89th said in Survey Sez...:
Me too. I suppose there's the risk that Vance would be better at implementing crazy Trump ideas since Vance is more articulate, but I'd imagine without Trump pressure Vance would be a much more stable and predictable leader, even if he is an earnest paleocon.
Not a chance.
Could you elaborate? What doesn't have a chance?
Vance being more capable of implementing Trump ideas. He may be more articulate, but I don’t think he has the cojones to pull off what Trump does.
I don't think he would try. I think the tariffs go away if Trump goes away, at the latest by the next administration.
Plus, I don’t think Vance lasts beyond the midterms. Vance is a bit too much of a true believer.
True believer in what?
-
Vance is a little too close to that wing of America First (and only) for my taste. Many of his closest political companions are a bit of Autarkatic for my taste.
-
He is very much into protectionism and big government. Reagan, this guy ain’t.
-
