Department of Education
-
Makes sense. As I said, dont know much about it.
But how far "down the chain" do you go? Each school can set their own standards? Each state?
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 22:56 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Department of Education:
Makes sense. As I said, dont know much about it.
But how far "down the chain" do you go? Each school can set their own standards? Each state?
Depends on the state as to how much freedom the local schoolboard has.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Department of Education:
Makes sense. As I said, dont know much about it.
But how far "down the chain" do you go? Each school can set their own standards? Each state?
Depends on the state as to how much freedom the local schoolboard has.
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 16:56 last edited by@Jolly said in Department of Education:
Depends on the state as to how much freedom the local schoolboard has.
Okay. But I would think it would be beneficial to have some sort of national (or at least state) standard.
Want to be XXX profession (doctor, lawyer, engineer, etc) there is a standarized test you must pass.
Various college studies (engineering for example) pretty much need to be accredited - again, following some sort of national standard.
(not saying the Dept. Of Ed could not have its functions taken up by another department)
I just think that going down to a "micro" scale of allowing each district/school to set their own standards is not a good idea.
-
@Jolly said in Department of Education:
Depends on the state as to how much freedom the local schoolboard has.
Okay. But I would think it would be beneficial to have some sort of national (or at least state) standard.
Want to be XXX profession (doctor, lawyer, engineer, etc) there is a standarized test you must pass.
Various college studies (engineering for example) pretty much need to be accredited - again, following some sort of national standard.
(not saying the Dept. Of Ed could not have its functions taken up by another department)
I just think that going down to a "micro" scale of allowing each district/school to set their own standards is not a good idea.
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 17:10 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Department of Education:
allowing each district/school to set their own standards is not a good idea.
It is a great idea for schools that excel.
You don't want to set average standards for above average schools.
That is the "E" in DEI. DEI people want to make everyone equal by bringing down the good students, not by bringing up the bad students.
-
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 17:24 last edited by
I think the overall argument against the DOE is that their funding has been going at at the same time student achievement has been plummeting. So what’s the point?
I think the real answer is probably more cultural.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Department of Education:
allowing each district/school to set their own standards is not a good idea.
It is a great idea for schools that excel.
You don't want to set average standards for above average schools.
That is the "E" in DEI. DEI people want to make everyone equal by bringing down the good students, not by bringing up the bad students.
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 18:09 last edited by@Copper said in Department of Education:
You don't want to set average standards for above average schools.
Sure you do. Then those schools exceed them.
You are a golfer. Every golf course sets a standard - the par score.
Great golfers exceed that score. Poor golfers do worse.
Same with setting standards for schools. Setting the standards does not mean that you cannot exceed them.
-
@Copper said in Department of Education:
You don't want to set average standards for above average schools.
Sure you do. Then those schools exceed them.
You are a golfer. Every golf course sets a standard - the par score.
Great golfers exceed that score. Poor golfers do worse.
Same with setting standards for schools. Setting the standards does not mean that you cannot exceed them.
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 18:16 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Department of Education:
Setting the standards does not mean that you cannot exceed them.
That is exactly what is done by setting the standards low.
Removing SAT scores for college admission is an example of this.
Golf handicaps are another example of this.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Department of Education:
Setting the standards does not mean that you cannot exceed them.
That is exactly what is done by setting the standards low.
Removing SAT scores for college admission is an example of this.
Golf handicaps are another example of this.
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 18:19 last edited by taiwan_girl 3 Jul 2025, 18:21@Copper said in Department of Education:
That is exactly what is done by setting the standards low.
So, you are saying that the DOE has been setting national education standards and they are setting them too low?
Removing SAT scores for college admission is an example of this.
My point exactly. The SAT is a "national" standard. LOL
-
I think the overall argument against the DOE is that their funding has been going at at the same time student achievement has been plummeting. So what’s the point?
I think the real answer is probably more cultural.
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 18:22 last edited by@xenon said in Department of Education:
I think the overall argument against the DOE is that their funding has been going at at the same time student achievement has been plummeting. So what’s the point?
I think the real answer is probably more cultural.
When they barred the kids from going to school during COVID, a lot of parents finally came face to face with what they're children were learning. Since COVID, we have had a boom in homeschooling and private schools. And it's not the cream that's being left behind in the public schools.
-
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 18:37 last edited by jon-nyc 3 Jul 2025, 18:39
I don’t think the DOE does what people here think it does.
Over half the budget is federal student aid - Pell grants, federal loans, etc. You going to zero that out? Another 30% or so are grants to K-12. You going to zero that out? 5% supports career and vocational training. Are we going to zero that out?
This will be like what he did to NAFTA. Basically rebrand it but leave it mostly unchanged.
-
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 18:48 last edited by
I didn’t realize that… that seems like more of an admin agency then
-
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 18:49 last edited by
No doubt the Doge kids can find some silly sounding DEI grants and save 3-4% of the budget. So there’s that.
-
-
wrote 23 days ago last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Department of Education:
Jesus.
I think it's a fictional account. He's got a book out called Detective Jesus #1.
-
wrote 23 days ago last edited by
Let's not shoot the messenger. Whether or not that's a fictional account, the fact remains that 25% of our students are testing in the lower quartile.
-
wrote 23 days ago last edited by
And the poor people in Africa have no quartiles at all.
-
wrote 23 days ago last edited by
25 cents US could feed an entire village for a month.
-
wrote 23 days ago last edited by
Because both parents, if there are two parents, are chasing the almighty dollar in today's ever more costly world
just to pay the electricity. Kids today do not receive quality parenting as a result. They expect the schools to take that over. Jon is right The DOE is not so much the curriculum creator that one thinks but is more another leg of American socialism, trying to fiscally take care of the less fortunate. The Right has shown their colors this time around without trying to hide it now, social programs cost too much when we have to keep lowering our donors' tax bills. It's really weird because they are supposed to represent their constituents who comprise MAGA and lesser zealots. But the very programs they want to kill are the ones their consituents need to get by. This government has gone full tilt. Greed is the reason the DOE will die. -
wrote 22 days ago last edited by
Just like something like 80% of all US males of driving age think that they are above average drivers! LOL
