The federal gravy train hits a hard stop
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 16:32 last edited by
This is interesting. Particularly this line.
"In Fiscal Year 2024, of the nearly $10 trillion that the Federal Government spent, more than $3 trillion was Federal financial assistance, such as grants and loans,"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/no-more-government-assistance/ar-AA1y0cTN
It should be noted that John Kasich did something similar in Ohio. There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth, but in the end it cut spending $8B. A lot of municipalities that only survived off state funding had to either cough up locally or meld into their counties. Funding for local projects needed to be supported more locally rather than OPM.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 16:36 last edited by
In 2021, Montana led the states with the highest proportion of federal funding to the overall budget at 31.8%, followed by New Mexico (30.7%), Kentucky (30.1%), Louisiana (29.8%), and Alaska (29.0%).
and
Another way to evaluate reliance on federal funding is on a per-person basis, where federal funding is represented as the average amount a state receives per resident to better illustrate the extent of federal support relative to population.
Using this metric, Alaska had the highest rate of federal funding in 2021 at roughly $8,628 per person, a whole 26.5% more than the second-highest state, Rhode Island, which received $6,821. They’re followed by New Mexico ($6,748), Wyoming ($6,718), and Delaware ($6,011).
https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-rely-the-most-on-federal-aid/
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 16:42 last edited by
The per person funding is interesting. New York receives more money per person than Louisiana.
-
In 2021, Montana led the states with the highest proportion of federal funding to the overall budget at 31.8%, followed by New Mexico (30.7%), Kentucky (30.1%), Louisiana (29.8%), and Alaska (29.0%).
and
Another way to evaluate reliance on federal funding is on a per-person basis, where federal funding is represented as the average amount a state receives per resident to better illustrate the extent of federal support relative to population.
Using this metric, Alaska had the highest rate of federal funding in 2021 at roughly $8,628 per person, a whole 26.5% more than the second-highest state, Rhode Island, which received $6,821. They’re followed by New Mexico ($6,748), Wyoming ($6,718), and Delaware ($6,011).
https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-rely-the-most-on-federal-aid/
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 16:43 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in The federal gravy train hits a hard stop:
the second-highest state, Rhode Island
uh oh
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 16:47 last edited by
When you net out taxes paid by state you see a huge subsidy from blue to red.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 16:50 last edited by
I don’t know. Probably part of it. A huge part is more rich people live on blue states so we pay more taxes.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 16:52 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in The federal gravy train hits a hard stop:
When you net out taxes paid by state you see a huge subsidy from blue to red.
Top ten
New Mexico
West Virginia
Alaska
Mississippi
Montana
Hawaii
Vermont
Louisiana
Alabama
WyomingBottom Ten
Minnesota
New Jersey
Delware
Illinois
Florida
Washington
S. Dakota
Mass
Nebraska
Californiahttps://digg.com/finance/link/states-most-dependent-on-the-federal-government-ranked-59CWzbWb10
-
I don’t know. Probably part of it. A huge part is more rich people live on blue states so we pay more taxes.
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 16:52 last edited by@jon-nyc Granted. But the statistic about net subsidy to red states takes on a very different pallor if it's agriculture stuff, rather than welfare stuff. Agriculture stuff is shared with the blue states as a necessity for their own existence.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 17:16 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in The federal gravy train hits a hard stop:
When you net out taxes paid by state you see a huge subsidy from blue to red.
Oh, that makes more sense. The earlier data quoted is very misleading.
-
I don’t know. Probably part of it. A huge part is more rich people live on blue states so we pay more taxes.
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 17:19 last edited by Mik@jon-nyc said in The federal gravy train hits a hard stop:
I don’t know. Probably part of it. A huge part is more rich people live on blue states so we pay more taxes.
Nonetheless, the debt is red and blue. Comparing it by party isn't going to help us solve the problem.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 17:25 last edited by
True that
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 17:49 last edited by
Red states farm, blue states eat.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 18:06 last edited by
@Copper said in The federal gravy train hits a hard stop:
Red states farm, blue states eat.
I'm pretty sure blue states eat too. Some of them eat a lot.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 18:07 last edited by
I'm pretty sure too-big-for-Lyft girl is a Democrat.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 18:08 last edited by
Largest farm state: California.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 18:08 last edited by Mik
Yeah, but they grow that Democrat food. Y'know, artichokes and almonds and shit. Brussels sprouts.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 18:09 last edited by
Top ten obesity states: All red.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 18:10 last edited by
They grow REAL food. Pigs and cows and shit.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 18:13 last edited by