David Muir
-
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 12:38 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 12:42 last edited by
Megyn Kelly's got a bit of a cheek complaining about this.
Incidentally, I know she's got a bit of a cheek because she shows it every time she crosses her legs.
-
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 12:54 last edited by
Yeah, it's petty, I agree.
I wonder, did the jacket come with the "ABC News" logo, or did they paste it on?
-
Yeah, it's petty, I agree.
I wonder, did the jacket come with the "ABC News" logo, or did they paste it on?
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 13:24 last edited by@George-K said in David Muir:
Yeah, it's petty, I agree.
It's not the pettiness so much as the hypocrisy that struck me.
Or maybe she sees herself as a poor innocent victim of the patriarchy having to dress up like that. And I use the term 'poor' in it's loosest possible context.
-
Yeah, it's petty, I agree.
I wonder, did the jacket come with the "ABC News" logo, or did they paste it on?
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 14:15 last edited by@George-K said in David Muir:
Yeah, it's petty, I agree.
I wonder, did the jacket come with the "ABC News" logo, or did they paste it on?
Hard to tell. I'd imagine they have a supply of high visibility jackets with the ABC logo already on them. That being said, using clothespins like that is really GEIGH
-
@George-K said in David Muir:
Yeah, it's petty, I agree.
It's not the pettiness so much as the hypocrisy that struck me.
Or maybe she sees herself as a poor innocent victim of the patriarchy having to dress up like that. And I use the term 'poor' in it's loosest possible context.
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 14:24 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in David Muir:
It's not the pettiness so much as the hypocrisy that struck me.
I disagree. She's a video personality with a very popular show on YouTube. It's part of her job to look good. Just as David Muir sits behind a desk, with a nice suit and necktie, looking ever so slightly askance at the camera. It's his job to look good as well,
Now, when you're at the site of natural (?) disaster, "looking good," should be far far down the list of tings to consider. Glad that someone found devices to help with his vanity.
-
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 14:26 last edited by
I had no idea who that was until this thread.
It occurs to me I can’t name any prime time anchor. Though maybe I’d recognize a name if I saw a list.
I thought this was going to be a thread pertaining to Muir the naturalist and something to do with the fires.
-
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 14:28 last edited by
Also in his defense, it was probably his makeup assistant that did it, not at his request. It’s what they do.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in David Muir:
It's not the pettiness so much as the hypocrisy that struck me.
I disagree. She's a video personality with a very popular show on YouTube. It's part of her job to look good. Just as David Muir sits behind a desk, with a nice suit and necktie, looking ever so slightly askance at the camera. It's his job to look good as well,
Now, when you're at the site of natural (?) disaster, "looking good," should be far far down the list of tings to consider. Glad that someone found devices to help with his vanity.
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 14:30 last edited by@George-K said in David Muir:
Just as David Muir sits behind a desk, with a nice suit and necktie, looking ever so slightly askance at the camera. It's his job to look good as well
Don't forget reading a script.
Look good and read words. That's journalism these days.
-
@George-K said in David Muir:
Just as David Muir sits behind a desk, with a nice suit and necktie, looking ever so slightly askance at the camera. It's his job to look good as well
Don't forget reading a script.
Look good and read words. That's journalism these days.
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 14:44 last edited by -
@Doctor-Phibes said in David Muir:
It's not the pettiness so much as the hypocrisy that struck me.
I disagree. She's a video personality with a very popular show on YouTube. It's part of her job to look good. Just as David Muir sits behind a desk, with a nice suit and necktie, looking ever so slightly askance at the camera. It's his job to look good as well,
Now, when you're at the site of natural (?) disaster, "looking good," should be far far down the list of tings to consider. Glad that someone found devices to help with his vanity.
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 16:49 last edited by Doctor Phibes 1 Sept 2025, 16:50@George-K said in David Muir:
@Doctor-Phibes said in David Muir:
It's not the pettiness so much as the hypocrisy that struck me.
I disagree. She's a video personality with a very popular show on YouTube. It's part of her job to look good. Just as David Muir sits behind a desk, with a nice suit and necktie, looking ever so slightly askance at the camera. It's his job to look good as well,
Now, when you're at the site of natural (?) disaster, "looking good," should be far far down the list of tings to consider. Glad that someone found devices to help with his vanity.
Hey, at least he didn't fart during the serious broadcast.
-
I had no idea who that was until this thread.
It occurs to me I can’t name any prime time anchor. Though maybe I’d recognize a name if I saw a list.
I thought this was going to be a thread pertaining to Muir the naturalist and something to do with the fires.
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 17:24 last edited by@jon-nyc said in David Muir:
I had no idea who that was until this thread.
It occurs to me I can’t name any prime time anchor.
He moderated the presidential debate in the presidential campaign you just lived through.
-
wrote on 9 Jan 2025, 17:26 last edited by
Is that why she’s allegedly so popular?
I wasn’t aware of the attraction of flatulence permeating US TV media.
-
wrote on 13 Jan 2025, 13:54 last edited by
Here's how it's done. No logo, no clothespins, and I like this guy's reporting style btw.
-
wrote on 13 Jan 2025, 13:59 last edited by
BTW the 60 minutes video:
Link to video