Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trump speaks

Trump speaks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
20 Posts 9 Posters 175 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Away
    MikM Away
    Mik
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    No, it isn't. It's one of the few things in the Constitution that I think may not be properly applicable to today but certainly was at the time.

    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Away
      MikM Away
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by Mik
      #8

      The Caller gets it right. He ate her lunch on pretty much every topic.

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/nbc-s-kristen-welker-hounded-trump-over-a-dozen-times-during-interview-about-whether-he-would-target-his-opponents/ar-AA1vuJl5

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Mik

        No, it isn't. It's one of the few things in the Constitution that I think may not be properly applicable to today but certainly was at the time.

        George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        @Mik said in Trump speaks:

        No, it isn't. It's one of the few things in the Constitution that I think may not be properly applicable to today but certainly was at the time.

        The quesionable part is "under the jurisdiction." If Juanita is born to Mexican citizens, under whose jurisdiction does she fall?

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          I don’t think it’s remotely questionable. Illegal aliens (as opposed to diplomats) get arrested if they commit crimes. NO ONE thinks they’re not subject to the legal jurisdiction where they find themselves. Certainly not the cops. Certainly not the courts. And certainly not the immigrants themselves.

          You were warned.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Even originalism (as opposed to textualism) won’t save you. The big question there is whether the ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ clause was excluding diplomats or Indians that were part of sovereign nations or both. No one thought it applied to the half starved family that showed up from County Cork last month.

            You were warned.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Community Notes for the win. Again.

              You were warned.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                It’s those libtard TDS folks at Cato calling him out.

                You were warned.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Who needs facts? 😛

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Away
                    MikM Away
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by Mik
                    #15

                    Facts are SO 1992. We dispensed with them when Clinton was elected. But in any event, he was as honest as she was.

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Mik

                      Facts are SO 1992. We dispensed with them when Clinton was elected. But in any event, he was as honest as she was.

                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                      #16

                      @Mik said in Trump speaks:

                      Facts are SO 1992. We dispensed with them when Clinton was elected. But in any event, he was as honest as she was.

                      Yes, I think it's clear we can blame Bill Clinton and the press for Trump being such a liar.

                      Who takes responsibility for his awful man-makeup and hair, Reagan?

                      I was only joking

                      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                      • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                        @Mik said in Trump speaks:

                        Facts are SO 1992. We dispensed with them when Clinton was elected. But in any event, he was as honest as she was.

                        Yes, I think it's clear we can blame Bill Clinton and the press for Trump being such a liar.

                        Who takes responsibility for his awful man-makeup and hair, Reagan?

                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Trump speaks:

                        @Mik said in Trump speaks:
                        Who takes responsibility for his awful man-makeup and hair, Reagan?

                        Keep my president’s name out of your %#*+<{< mouth!

                        The Brad

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          And by the way, the community notes feature on Twitter is awesome.

                          The Brad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • HoraceH Online
                            HoraceH Online
                            Horace
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            I'm not too worried about that departure from facts culled from a 70 minute interview, when all he intends to do in reaction to the non-factual narrative, is to enforce the law. A generous interpretation of it is that he intends to engage in hyperbole when he thinks it'll get eyeballs and minds on an issue he would like to address.

                            Education is extremely important.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              That would be too generous I think. Maga media pushed that hard. The original authors I assume knew they were lying. But most who just heard it repeated over and over probably assumed it was true. I suspect he’s in the latter category.

                              You were warned.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups