ChatGPT
-
That way you get physical, biometric proofs right there.
A while ago, I read about a company that was promoting pens that contained DNA within the ink to prove the signature was valid.
I believe that their original idea was to market it to people who were famous enough to sell their autographs or things like that.
@taiwan_girl said in ChatGPT:
That way you get physical, biometric proofs right there.
A while ago, I read about a company that was promoting pens that contained DNA within the ink to prove the signature was valid.
I believe that their original idea was to market it to people who were famous enough to sell their autographs or things like that.
Nathan Tardiff does the same thing with an $8 bottle. Has been for years. Each one has unique markers that don't break down over time.
He makes a red that literally binds to the celluloid cells of the paper. It's pretty damn impossible to remove the ink.
-
She took our jobs!
https://fortune.com/europe/2023/11/23/spanish-influencer-agency-earned-11000-ai-model-posers/
Spanish modeling/influencer agency created AI generated model to do the jobs of models and social media influencers, because they find real life influencers are too costly and too unreliable to work with.
-
Go to the 5:15 mark for the ChatGPT bit:
Link to video -
https://gizmodo.com/google-search-ai-overview-giant-hallucination-1851499031
Google Search Is Now a Giant Hallucination
Article with many examples showing failures in AI generate “summaries” provided by Google in response to search queries.
-
-
No idea if ChatGPT or some other generative AI is involved.
Link to video -
Those who must not be named:
The chat-breaking behavior occurs consistently when users mention these names in any context, and it results from a hard-coded filter that puts the brakes on the AI model's output before returning it to the user.
...
Here's a list of ChatGPT-breaking names found so far through a communal effort taking place on social media and Reddit. ...- Brian Hood
- Johnathan Turley
- Johnathan Zittrain
- David Faber
- Guido Scorza
-
Too lazy to study, but who are those people?
-
Interesting. From the article:
As for Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University Law School professor and Fox News contributor, 404 Media notes that he wrote about ChatGPT's earlier mishandling of his name in April 2023. The model had fabricated false claims about him, including a non-existent sexual harassment scandal that cited a Washington Post article that never existed. Turley told 404 Media he has not filed lawsuits against OpenAI and said the company never contacted him about the issue.
I tried to back them into the name. You can see it started to generate a response but then stopped.
-
https://news.virginmediao2.co.uk/o2-unveils-daisy-the-ai-granny-wasting-scammers-time/
AI Scambaiter: AI ‘Granny’ to waste scammers’ time
Link to videoBest I can do, when a scammer calls, is to keep the line open but hit the mute button. :man-shrugging:
-
That is very cool, but @George-K beat you to it.
https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/34893/automated-call-block/9?_=1733672446662
-
Good educational introduction to Large Language Model (LLM):
Link to videoGood educational introduction to Large Language Model (LLM):
Link to videoFinally got around to watching that (short) video. Not sure I'm clearer or more confused about it all, ha. The processing behind it is impossible to comprehend, which makes it both exciting and dangerous to an extent. Nonetheless, I wonder if AI will in the future be so good that it could do seemingly impossible things such as translating animal sounds (what's that dog saying?) or more pragmatically, what EXACTLY will the weather be in 2 weeks.
-
And then connect that data to your quantum computer to predict what they do next.
And then arrest murderers before they murder.
