Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Jesus

Jesus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
58 Posts 15 Posters 641 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by Jolly
    #4

    You might get some experience with how RFK views things before long.

    Could be interesting.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Jolly

      Solution: Don't lie to people.

      X Offline
      X Offline
      xenon
      wrote on last edited by xenon
      #5

      @Jolly said in Jesus:

      Solution: Don't lie to people.

      Completely agree - you shouldn't lie to people. But the solution is a couple of decades in vaccine science purgatory to atone for the CDC's politics in 2020? (under Trump's nose, no less).

      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Offline
        MikM Offline
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        I think when it went off the rails is when people started getting fired.

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          What the fuck does any of that have to do with blaming vaccines for autism?

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          1 Reply Last reply
          • taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girl
            wrote on last edited by taiwan_girl
            #8

            His opening comment shows just how stupid he is.

            "When RFK was born, there were 3 vaccines..........."

            Okay. When Abraham Lincoln was born, there were zero vaccines and zero kids diagnosed with autism.

            Obviously people were more healthy back then. I bet the lifespan was 150 years +

            🙄

            1 Reply Last reply
            • 89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote on last edited by 89th
              #9

              He says there were 3 vaccines for kids and now there are 76. There are 15.

              He says this is because of what happened in 1986. Back then, the under-5 mortality rate was 14 in 1,000. It has since been cut in half (7 in 1,000). I wonder why.

              For autism, I have no idea but I bet the rates are increasing because of increased awareness and finer-tuned diagnosis requirements.

              taiwan_girlT Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
              • LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                I personally have no problem with vaccines. At the same time, I don’t believe the pharmaceutical companies should have such a wide ranging protection.

                The Brad

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 89th

                  He says there were 3 vaccines for kids and now there are 76. There are 15.

                  He says this is because of what happened in 1986. Back then, the under-5 mortality rate was 14 in 1,000. It has since been cut in half (7 in 1,000). I wonder why.

                  For autism, I have no idea but I bet the rates are increasing because of increased awareness and finer-tuned diagnosis requirements.

                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @89th said in Jesus:

                  For autism, I have no idea but I bet the rates are increasing because of increased awareness and finer-tuned diagnosis requirements.

                  I agree.

                  150 years ago, how many people were diagnosed and died from (for example) Parkinsons? MS? ALS?

                  jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    I know several people, including some family, who labeled their kids as having Aspergers to explain why they weren't succeeding at whatever. It was a HUGE mistake. Stick that label on a kid and he will underperform forever.

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
                    • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                      @89th said in Jesus:

                      For autism, I have no idea but I bet the rates are increasing because of increased awareness and finer-tuned diagnosis requirements.

                      I agree.

                      150 years ago, how many people were diagnosed and died from (for example) Parkinsons? MS? ALS?

                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                      #13

                      @taiwan_girl said in Jesus:

                      @89th said in Jesus:

                      For autism, I have no idea but I bet the rates are increasing because of increased awareness and finer-tuned diagnosis requirements.

                      I agree.

                      150 years ago, how many people were diagnosed and died from (for example) Parkinsons? MS? ALS?

                      When I was a kid the kids who today would be given ADHD diagnoses were labeled ‘hyperactive’ if not just ‘troublemaker’.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • MikM Mik

                        I know several people, including some family, who labeled their kids as having Aspergers to explain why they weren't succeeding at whatever. It was a HUGE mistake. Stick that label on a kid and he will underperform forever.

                        Aqua LetiferA Offline
                        Aqua LetiferA Offline
                        Aqua Letifer
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @Mik said in Jesus:

                        I know several people, including some family, who labeled their kids as having Aspergers to explain why they weren't succeeding at whatever. It was a HUGE mistake. Stick that label on a kid and he will underperform forever.

                        I think labels and diagnoses are not bad in themselves, but too many parents and children can't differentiate between "category" and "excuse."

                        Please love yourself.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • X xenon

                          @Jolly said in Jesus:

                          Solution: Don't lie to people.

                          Completely agree - you shouldn't lie to people. But the solution is a couple of decades in vaccine science purgatory to atone for the CDC's politics in 2020? (under Trump's nose, no less).

                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          @xenon said in Jesus:

                          @Jolly said in Jesus:

                          Solution: Don't lie to people.

                          Completely agree - you shouldn't lie to people. But the solution is a couple of decades in vaccine science purgatory to atone for the CDC's politics in 2020? (under Trump's nose, no less).

                          Be more explicit - the CDC lied about masks therefore we’re going to put a generation of children at risk, many of whom will die.

                          Can someone - anyone - walk me through the logic here? Jolly?

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          LuFins DadL JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                          • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor Phibes
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            What’s really sad is Trump’s people pandering to a whack job like RFK over this issue in order to gain the crunchy nut flake vote.

                            I was only joking

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins Dad
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              I think you’ll probably see them remove the protections for the vaccine manufacturers. Depending on the limits, I don’t find that unreasonable. There will also likely be some new studies. Not sure that I like that very much. I think we all can agree that we’ve seen how bias can affect studies…

                              The Brad

                              jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              • RichR Offline
                                RichR Offline
                                Rich
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                Yeah, sort of hoping the blanket anti-vax stuff doesn't actually make it into any meaningful policy decisions.

                                tbh, I'd even been wondering if the RFK/Trump alliance could make it all the way through to the election...Kennedy has a real 'big business=bad' kind of way about him. How long into an administration could it be before heads but, and Trumps latest best bud, becomes another 'lame brain' that had to get fired?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                  Doctor Phibes
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  I think it’s highly possible he’ll dump RFK once he becomes inconvenient. Let’s hope so, at least.

                                  “RFK, go away, what more do I have to say?”

                                  I was only joking

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • HoraceH Offline
                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    Horace
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    After the pro-vax side used its rhetorical currency to force people to take the jab, on penalty of economic death, the appeal of the anti-vax side spread far wider than crunchy soccer moms.

                                    Education is extremely important.

                                    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • HoraceH Horace

                                      After the pro-vax side used its rhetorical currency to force people to take the jab, on penalty of economic death, the appeal of the anti-vax side spread far wider than crunchy soccer moms.

                                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor Phibes
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @Horace said in Jesus:

                                      After the pro-vax side used its rhetorical currency to force people to take the jab, on penalty of economic death, the appeal of the anti-vax side spread far wider than crunchy soccer moms.

                                      Yeah, that was definitely a stupid strategic move.

                                      I was only joking

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                        I think you’ll probably see them remove the protections for the vaccine manufacturers. Depending on the limits, I don’t find that unreasonable. There will also likely be some new studies. Not sure that I like that very much. I think we all can agree that we’ve seen how bias can affect studies…

                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in Jesus:

                                        I think you’ll probably see them remove the protections for the vaccine manufacturers. Depending on the limits, I don’t find that unreasonable.

                                        That’s legislation, not executive action. I don’t know enough about it but let’s do gun manufacturers too.

                                        There will also likely be some new studies. Not sure that I like that very much.

                                        As long as it’s P4 (post-marketing, IOW they don’t pause immunizing babies in the mean time).

                                        I think we all can agree that we’ve seen how bias can affect studies…

                                        Far less common in interventional drug studies because the entire statistical analysis has to be pre-registered with and approved by the FDA. In the few instances where we’ve seen pharma cheat it’s full on felonious shit like hiding data, not putting the thumb on the scale with a little p-fishing.

                                        Only non-witches get due process.

                                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                          @xenon said in Jesus:

                                          @Jolly said in Jesus:

                                          Solution: Don't lie to people.

                                          Completely agree - you shouldn't lie to people. But the solution is a couple of decades in vaccine science purgatory to atone for the CDC's politics in 2020? (under Trump's nose, no less).

                                          Be more explicit - the CDC lied about masks therefore we’re going to put a generation of children at risk, many of whom will die.

                                          Can someone - anyone - walk me through the logic here? Jolly?

                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins Dad
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @jon-nyc said in Jesus:

                                          @xenon said in Jesus:

                                          @Jolly said in Jesus:

                                          Solution: Don't lie to people.

                                          Completely agree - you shouldn't lie to people. But the solution is a couple of decades in vaccine science purgatory to atone for the CDC's politics in 2020? (under Trump's nose, no less).

                                          Be more explicit - the CDC lied about masks therefore we’re going to put a generation of children at risk, many of whom will die.

                                          Can someone - anyone - walk me through the logic here? Jolly?

                                          Again? Okay…

                                          1. “Our data from the CDC today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick, and that it's not just in the clinical trials, but it's also in real-world data,” Walensky - March 30, 2021

                                          2. Masking kids is effective… Throughout the last 4 years. There are still people trying it.

                                          3. Myocarditis? Of course not! AND COVID poses a serious risk to younger children.

                                          4. Lab leak? Of course not! It was bats… Or possibly Pangolins. From the market in Wuhan. Just go past the institute studying Coronaviruses and make a left.

                                          5. It is dangerous to take ivermectin! Which is a horse dewormer!

                                          6. Don’t mask! Okay, we take that back, mask if you feel comfortable. Wait… Dear God! Wrap your face in plastic wrap if you have to!

                                          7. Herd immunity can be achieved at 70%… No, wait, 80%… All while having evidence they needed 60%.

                                          8. The rate of hospitalizations in children is rising! Referring to a small statistical blip weeks before that had already settled and gone to prior levels and even lower.

                                          9. 6 feet! The science tells us 6 feet! There was no fucking science showing that..

                                          Shall I go on?

                                          The Brad

                                          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups