Bidenomics At Work
-
@LuFins-Dad zerohedge usually comes out with that info in a timely basis. But not yet today.
@George-K said in Bidenomics At Work:
@LuFins-Dad zerohedge usually comes out with that info in a timely basis. But not yet today.
I thought I saw something that showed they just had a MASSIVE revision for December and March.
-
He gets community noted every time he posts that
-
Black and Hispanic unemployment is at a record low
There have never been more Black and Hispanic Americans in the workforce, Friday’s Labor Department job report showed.
The jobless rate for Hispanics hit a record low of 3.9% in September, while African Americans maintained its lowest rate ever, 5.5%.
Oh, wait. That was from 2019. My bad...
Jobless rates rise in May for all racial groups except white Americans
White unemployment remained at 3.5% last month, making the demographic group the only one that didn’t experience a rise in jobless rates from April to May. It also went against the overall unemployment rate, which edged higher to 4% from 3.9%.
Meanwhile, the jobless rate for Black Americans rose to 6.1% from 5.6%. For Asian and Hispanic workers, respectively, it rose to 3.1% from 2.8%, and to 5% from 4.8%.
-
About doing "multiple gig jobs" vs. "one full time job," while "one full time job" is easier and more more predictable day-to-day, the "multiple gig jobs" model is arguably lower risk long term because you won't be completely out of work and out of income because an employer goes bust or terminate you all of a sudden.
Yeah, the Industrial Revolution somehow led to an abundance of jobs that are steady year round, it lifted the standard of living for the masses. It's good to have "one steady full time job", it's good to not have to worry about what to do with your next eight hours (because your employer planned it out for you). But why would one expect that model to last forever?
-
Gig jobs do not normally come with benefits.
-
@Jolly said in Bidenomics At Work:
Gig jobs do not normally come with benefits.
That we need to fix with single payer universal healthcare. Single payer universal healthcare is the right solution regardless of whether the labor pool is mostly “full time” or mostly “gig” workers.
-
@Jolly said in Bidenomics At Work:
Gig jobs do not normally come with benefits.
That we need to fix with single payer universal healthcare. Single payer universal healthcare is the right solution regardless of whether the labor pool is mostly “full time” or mostly “gig” workers.
@Axtremus said in Bidenomics At Work:
@Jolly said in Bidenomics At Work:
Gig jobs do not normally come with benefits.
That we need to fix with single payer universal healthcare. Single payer universal healthcare is the right solution regardless of whether the labor pool is mostly “full time” or mostly “gig” workers.
Great, I nominate you to be the single payer.
The Brad
-
@Jolly said in Bidenomics At Work:
Gig jobs do not normally come with benefits.
That we need to fix with single payer universal healthcare. Single payer universal healthcare is the right solution regardless of whether the labor pool is mostly “full time” or mostly “gig” workers.
-
@Axtremus said in Bidenomics At Work:
@Jolly said in Bidenomics At Work:
Gig jobs do not normally come with benefits.
That we need to fix with single payer universal healthcare. Single payer universal healthcare is the right solution regardless of whether the labor pool is mostly “full time” or mostly “gig” workers.
Great, I nominate you to be the single payer.
@LuFins-Dad said in Bidenomics At Work:
@Axtremus said in Bidenomics At Work:
@Jolly said in Bidenomics At Work:
Gig jobs do not normally come with benefits.
That we need to fix with single payer universal healthcare. Single payer universal healthcare is the right solution regardless of whether the labor pool is mostly “full time” or mostly “gig” workers.
Great, I nominate you to be the single payer.
-
-
-
So it was 1¢ less?
@LuFins-Dad said in Bidenomics At Work:
So it was 1¢ less?
Same price, one less bowl of peppers (I used to get sweet AND hot) one less piece of bread (I used to get five), and probably less italian beef.
Shrinkflation.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Bidenomics At Work:
So it was 1¢ less?
Same price, one less bowl of peppers (I used to get sweet AND hot) one less piece of bread (I used to get five), and probably less italian beef.
Shrinkflation.
@George-K said in Bidenomics At Work:
@LuFins-Dad said in Bidenomics At Work:
So it was 1¢ less?
Same price, one less bowl of peppers (I used to get sweet AND hot) one less piece of bread (I used to get five), and probably less italian beef.
Shrinkflation.
Ahhh, I didn’t look closely enough at the packages.
-
BLS Jobs Report
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
The revisions:
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for April was revised down by 57,000, from +165,000 to +108,000, and the change for May was revised down by 54,000, from +272,000 to +218,000. With these revisions, employment in April and May combined is 111,000 lower than previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors.)
-
BLS Jobs Report
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
The revisions:
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for April was revised down by 57,000, from +165,000 to +108,000, and the change for May was revised down by 54,000, from +272,000 to +218,000. With these revisions, employment in April and May combined is 111,000 lower than previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors.)
@George-K Thats a good thing, right? "Cooler" economy means less pressure on keeping interest rates high?
This isn't actually something very new. Been happening for years, not just under President Biden.
https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-2/revisions-to-jobs-numbers.htm
The initial estimate of job change for a month is based on the growth or loss of jobs at the businesses that have reported their data. Generally, BLS assumes that the employment situation at businesses that had reported is representative of the situation at those that had not yet reported. BLS continues to collect outstanding reports from the businesses in the sample as it prepares a second and then a third estimate for the month. With each subsequent estimate, more businesses have provided their information. In 2012, the average collection rate at the time of the third estimate for a month was 94.6 percent. (See chart 1.)
So why doesn’t BLS wait until it has all the reports to make the estimate and avoid revisions? Users of the data are intensely interested in the earliest possible read on labor market developments, and experience suggests that the initial estimate is generally very good. For example, in 2012, the average monthly employment change using the first estimate would have been +142,000, compared with a monthly average change of +165,000 using the third estimate. (See table 1.) Nevertheless, it is true that in some months, revisions are large enough that they change the users’ perspectives on the current state of the economy. In November 2012, for example, the initial estimate of over-the-month change was +146,000, while the third estimate was +247,000.
