Bidenomics
-
wrote on 27 Mar 2024, 15:19 last edited by
I'll take your word for it. I don't know enough to accurately quote those costs.
-
wrote on 27 Mar 2024, 15:31 last edited by
-
wrote on 27 Mar 2024, 15:41 last edited by
The bitch of it is, it’s an unforced error and unneeded lie to make his point. It’s a 27% increase in butter. For the sake of this argument, let’s say that’s a universal increase on all materials. That doesn’t translate into only a 27% increase in his product price. With inflation, he’s also having to raise his wages, and to match that inflation, he has needed to raise his wages by the 20% per hour. Now I have no idea his volume and the labor costs involved per unit for his product, but you could easily see that being another 5%-7%. In addition, and this gets missed by most, if the company’s output volume stays the same and the costs have all increased dramatically, then the company must increase their profit margin to simply maintain.
-
wrote on 29 Mar 2024, 11:36 last edited by
Krugman:
Bidenomics Is Making China Angry. That’s OK.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/28/opinion/biden-trump-china.html
Trump made a big show of taking on China, but he was ineffective when in office and appears to have folded on TikTok when donor money was at stake. Biden talks more softly but is wielding a really big stick. Or to put it another way, Trump isn’t actually a tough guy on China; he just plays one on TV. Biden is the real deal.
-
wrote on 29 Mar 2024, 11:51 last edited by
Why people don't feel good about the economy, from the WSJ:
Link to video -
wrote on 29 Mar 2024, 14:42 last edited by
I watched most of it but didn't hear any mention about the job market.
-
Krugman:
Bidenomics Is Making China Angry. That’s OK.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/28/opinion/biden-trump-china.html
Trump made a big show of taking on China, but he was ineffective when in office and appears to have folded on TikTok when donor money was at stake. Biden talks more softly but is wielding a really big stick. Or to put it another way, Trump isn’t actually a tough guy on China; he just plays one on TV. Biden is the real deal.
wrote on 30 Mar 2024, 16:16 last edited by@Axtremus said in Bidenomics:
Krugman:
Bidenomics Is Making China Angry. That’s OK.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/28/opinion/biden-trump-china.html
Trump made a big show of taking on China, but he was ineffective when in office and appears to have folded on TikTok when donor money was at stake. Biden talks more softly but is wielding a really big stick. Or to put it another way, Trump isn’t actually a tough guy on China; he just plays one on TV. Biden is the real deal.
Snort. He should get a job writing for SNL.
-
wrote on 2 Apr 2024, 00:01 last edited by
-
wrote on 2 Apr 2024, 00:04 last edited by
@George-K said in Bidenomics:
Remember the article by Summers et al?
I'm so old that I can remember when Millennials bitched about this very phenomenon 15 years ago, and boomers told them to stop whining because it didn't fit their narrative at the time.
This exact issue.
-
@George-K said in Bidenomics:
Remember the article by Summers et al?
I'm so old that I can remember when Millennials bitched about this very phenomenon 15 years ago, and boomers told them to stop whining because it didn't fit their narrative at the time.
This exact issue.
wrote on 2 Apr 2024, 00:06 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Bidenomics:
This exact issue.
We bought our first house in 1980. 13.25% mortgage on a $75K note. I wonder how the statistics of this tweet would compare to that.
(too lazy to look it up)
-
wrote on 2 Apr 2024, 00:06 last edited by
You're not a man until you pay 16.5% interest.
-
wrote on 2 Apr 2024, 00:07 last edited by
@Copper said in Bidenomics:
You're not a man until you pay 16.5% interest.
Yeah, that's true. My 1986 adjustable had that - actually 17.4% irrc.
-
wrote on 2 Apr 2024, 02:38 last edited by Axtremus 4 Feb 2024, 02:40
About home buying affordability referenced in reply #81, this is the underlying study:
https://www.bankrate.com/real-estate/home-affordability-in-current-housing-market-study/
Out of all 50 states and the District of Columbia, California requires the highest annual salary to afford a typical home at $197,057, followed by:
Hawaii: $185,829
District of Columbia: $167,871
Massachusetts: $162,471
Washington: $156,814Mississippi requires the lowest income to afford a home in the U.S. at $63,043, followed by:
Ohio: $64,071
Arkansas: $64,714
Indiana: $65,143
Kentucky: $65,1865 states where income required to afford a typical home grew the most
Skyrocketing home prices in these states mean higher salaries are needed to afford a typical home
Montana experienced the most significant increase of income needed to afford a typical home between January 2020 and January 2024, followed by Utah, Tennessee, South Carolina and Arizona.5 states where income required to afford a typical home grew the least
The annual salary needed to afford a typical home grew the least in North Dakota, the District of Columbia, Louisiana, Illinois and Kansas between January 2020 and January 2024.By “salary,” I think they mean household income, or “combined salary” of both spouses; in which case $110,871 means roughly $55.5k each for a two-income household.
-
topic:timeago-later,8 days
-
wrote on 10 Apr 2024, 13:33 last edited by
@Axtremus said in Bidenomics:
Biden is owning it.
Surging gas prices and sky-high mortgages and rent sent inflation rising more than expected in March, adding to Americans’ prolonged and painful battle with high costs. That could force the Federal Reserve to keep its punishing rates higher for longer.
US consumer prices picked up again last month, vaulting to a 3.5% increase for the 12 months ended in March, according to the latest Consumer Price Index data released Wednesday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
That’s up considerably from February’s 3.2% rate and marks the highest annual gain in the past six months. Friday’s report further highlights that the path to lower inflation remains extremely bumpy — and continue to be a drag on Americans’ hard-earned finances — and that any loosening of monetary policy might not happen soon.
“You can kiss a June interest rate cut goodbye,” Greg McBride, chief financial analyst for Bankrate, wrote in commentary issued Wednesday.
US futures tanked Wednesday after the release of the hotter-than-expected inflation data, with Dow futures falling by more than 475 points. Futures on the S&P fell by 1.25% and Nasdaq futures slipped by 1.3%. Treasury yields topped 4.5%.
-
wrote on 10 Apr 2024, 16:44 last edited by
Economics is hard, CNN.
If you just looked at the chyron, you'd think prices went up 3.5% IN A MONTH.
-
wrote on 10 Apr 2024, 16:59 last edited by
It seems to me that the market didn’t exactly take off with the recent wonderful jobs report…
-
It seems to me that the market didn’t exactly take off with the recent wonderful jobs report…
wrote on 10 Apr 2024, 17:54 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Bidenomics:
It seems to me that the market didn’t exactly take off with the recent wonderful jobs report…
That's just the start. Wait another 2 years.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Bidenomics:
It seems to me that the market didn’t exactly take off with the recent wonderful jobs report…
That's just the start. Wait another 2 years.
wrote on 10 Apr 2024, 19:08 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Bidenomics:
@LuFins-Dad said in Bidenomics:
It seems to me that the market didn’t exactly take off with the recent wonderful jobs report…
That's just the start. Wait another 2 years.
For various reasons, I think you're right. Aside from the judges, particularly SCOTUS , wouldn't hurt my feelings tremendously if Trump lost this election.
Which may be why the Dems seem to be leaving Biden in there.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Bidenomics:
@LuFins-Dad said in Bidenomics:
It seems to me that the market didn’t exactly take off with the recent wonderful jobs report…
That's just the start. Wait another 2 years.
For various reasons, I think you're right. Aside from the judges, particularly SCOTUS , wouldn't hurt my feelings tremendously if Trump lost this election.
Which may be why the Dems seem to be leaving Biden in there.
wrote on 10 Apr 2024, 19:18 last edited by@Jolly said in Bidenomics:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Bidenomics:
@LuFins-Dad said in Bidenomics:
It seems to me that the market didn’t exactly take off with the recent wonderful jobs report…
That's just the start. Wait another 2 years.
For various reasons, I think you're right. Aside from the judges, particularly SCOTUS , wouldn't hurt my feelings tremendously if Trump lost this election.
Which may be why the Dems seem to be leaving Biden in there.
Yeah, I'd love to be wrong and hope I am. But I don't see any evidence for that yet.
-
wrote on 10 Apr 2024, 19:29 last edited by
So you guys are suggesting that kicking the can down the road for decades, then coupled with an unprecedented influx of cash into the M1, along with incredible inflation over the last few years, interest rates that are twice what they were 4 years ago, and a workforce that is not growing manufacturing jobs, but is increasing government and part-time employment at incredible rates could ultimately have a negative outcome?