Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Meanwhile, at Harvard...

Meanwhile, at Harvard...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
237 Posts 16 Posters 7.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    From the RWEC:


    What is striking to me is how unintelligently these three academics answered Stefanik’s questions. There are actually some interesting issues here, which a smart and principled administrator could have spoken about in a compelling way. But these academic hacks had nothing insightful to say, and were just trying to get out of the hearing as fast as they could, smirking all the while. I would only add that a Harvard student who wrote that all blacks should be murdered–say, in a conservative student paper, if Harvard had one–would not have a future at that institution. There would be no discussion of “context.”

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #96

      "Exclusionary is ok if it's self-imposed."

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #97

        Is this "seizing" or "pouncing?"

        image.jpeg

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
          #98

          Interesting take. A bit of a nitpick but probably correct.

          You were warned.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Online
            HoraceH Online
            Horace
            wrote on last edited by
            #99

            It would not have occurred to me that a policy against bullying and harassment would allow for calls for genocide against a certain group, while prohibiting calls for killing individual members of that group. Their premise is that that distinction is totally reasonable.

            Education is extremely important.

            jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • Aqua LetiferA Offline
              Aqua LetiferA Offline
              Aqua Letifer
              wrote on last edited by Aqua Letifer
              #100

              I also think the tweet misses the point entirely. Yeah sure okay, that's what the hearings are about, but the problem on the table right now, the one we are and should be focusing on, isn't adherence to university harassment policies.

              Please love yourself.

              jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Online
                HoraceH Online
                Horace
                wrote on last edited by
                #101

                It's barely even worth making the hackneyed point that a call for the extermination of black people would not be tolerated. It's like we're ignoring the elephant in the room about double standards, and trying to make sense of this anti-semitic speech in isolation, and failing even to do that.

                Education is extremely important.

                jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Horace

                  It would not have occurred to me that a policy against bullying and harassment would allow for calls for genocide against a certain group, while prohibiting calls for killing individual members of that group. Their premise is that that distinction is totally reasonable.

                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #102

                  @Horace

                  His point is that harassment and bullying predicate interpersonal interactions.

                  It’s definitional. It’s not some fine distinction.

                  You were warned.

                  HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Horace

                    It's barely even worth making the hackneyed point that a call for the extermination of black people would not be tolerated. It's like we're ignoring the elephant in the room about double standards, and trying to make sense of this anti-semitic speech in isolation, and failing even to do that.

                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #103

                    @Horace

                    He goes on to make the point that an hypocrisy charge is totally appropriate.

                    To be clear, since many people are making this point, I completely agree with @DeadLiftCapital that the university presidents can be charged with hypocrisy, but that is not the point that Stefanik or Ackman are making and is irrelevant to my argument.

                    You were warned.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      @Horace

                      His point is that harassment and bullying predicate interpersonal interactions.

                      It’s definitional. It’s not some fine distinction.

                      HoraceH Online
                      HoraceH Online
                      Horace
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #104

                      @jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                      @Horace

                      His point is that harassment and bullying predicate interpersonal interactions.

                      It’s definitional. It’s not some fine distinction.

                      It remains unsatisfying to believe there is a reasonable distinction to be made between "Kill Jews", "Kill all the Jews on campus", "Kill the members of the Jewish Zionist Student Organization", "Kill Joe the Jew". Based on your idea of the clear definitions, which of those aren't allowed, and which are?

                      Education is extremely important.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                        #105

                        It isn’t a question of what’s allowed. It’s a question of what constitutes harassment.

                        If I post a general comment here about (say) gender differences, should an employee at my foundation be able to report it to HR as harassment?

                        Of course not.

                        What if I post it and then send them the link? That’s different.

                        You were warned.

                        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                          It isn’t a question of what’s allowed. It’s a question of what constitutes harassment.

                          If I post a general comment here about (say) gender differences, should an employee at my foundation be able to report it to HR as harassment?

                          Of course not.

                          What if I post it and then send them the link? That’s different.

                          HoraceH Online
                          HoraceH Online
                          Horace
                          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                          #106

                          @jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                          It isn’t a question of what’s allowed. It’s a question of what constitutes harassment.

                          If I post a general comment here about (say) gender differences, should an employee at my foundation be able to report it to HR as harassment?

                          Of course not.

                          What if I post it and then send them the link? That’s different.

                          Thanks. I guess I was thinking about it all wrong. I had been thinking that the subject was, what was or was not allowed as campus speech.

                          ***************-
                          note from Jon. I tried to reply to this but hit edit accidentally. I cut off the rest of his paragraph. The text below here is my “reply”
                          ***************-

                          The entirety of Lemoine’s point was about Stefanik asking about whether this constituted ‘harassment and bullying’.

                          Perhaps the universities have ‘hate speech’ codes that this could have violated, in which case surely the Representative could have nailed them on that.

                          Education is extremely important.

                          HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #107

                            FIRE President Greg Lukianoff with a principled take as you would expect.

                            You were warned.

                            HoraceH George KG 2 Replies Last reply
                            • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

                              I also think the tweet misses the point entirely. Yeah sure okay, that's what the hearings are about, but the problem on the table right now, the one we are and should be focusing on, isn't adherence to university harassment policies.

                              jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #108

                              @Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                              I also think the tweet misses the point entirely. Yeah sure okay, that's what the hearings are about, but the problem on the table right now, the one we are and should be focusing on, isn't adherence to university harassment policies.

                              Seems like Representative Stefancik missed the point.

                              You were warned.

                              Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #109

                                Horace - forgive me I accidentally edited your post above instead of replying to it. Fat fingers, small phone.

                                I can’t undo it or I would. I’ll make a note in the post itself

                                You were warned.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • HoraceH Horace

                                  @jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                  It isn’t a question of what’s allowed. It’s a question of what constitutes harassment.

                                  If I post a general comment here about (say) gender differences, should an employee at my foundation be able to report it to HR as harassment?

                                  Of course not.

                                  What if I post it and then send them the link? That’s different.

                                  Thanks. I guess I was thinking about it all wrong. I had been thinking that the subject was, what was or was not allowed as campus speech.

                                  ***************-
                                  note from Jon. I tried to reply to this but hit edit accidentally. I cut off the rest of his paragraph. The text below here is my “reply”
                                  ***************-

                                  The entirety of Lemoine’s point was about Stefanik asking about whether this constituted ‘harassment and bullying’.

                                  Perhaps the universities have ‘hate speech’ codes that this could have violated, in which case surely the Representative could have nailed them on that.

                                  HoraceH Online
                                  HoraceH Online
                                  Horace
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #110

                                  @jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                  The entirety of Lemoine’s point was about Stefanik asking about whether this constituted ‘harassment and bullying’.

                                  Perhaps the universities have ‘hate speech’ codes that this could have violated, in which case surely the Representative could have nailed them on that.

                                  My four scenarios about Joe the Jew are coherent as either allowed or disallowed within any policy you'd care to name.

                                  Education is extremely important.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                    FIRE President Greg Lukianoff with a principled take as you would expect.

                                    HoraceH Online
                                    HoraceH Online
                                    Horace
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #111

                                    @jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                    FIRE President Greg Lukianoff with a principled take as you would expect.

                                    From the from the comments:

                                    Best line: "As FIRE President and CEO Greg Lukianoff has written, censorship doesn’t change a person’s mind — it only prevents us from knowing what’s in their mind."

                                    This is actually not quite accurate. Ideas which people cannot talk about, do die, or are at least damaged. It's poetic to think that somehow, karmically, the ideas remain, and emerge stronger when finally freed, but really, as programmable meat robots, if you deprive humans of the programming, which is to say the messaging and conversation around it, those ideas do go away.

                                    Education is extremely important.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                      @Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                      I also think the tweet misses the point entirely. Yeah sure okay, that's what the hearings are about, but the problem on the table right now, the one we are and should be focusing on, isn't adherence to university harassment policies.

                                      Seems like Representative Stefancik missed the point.

                                      Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                      Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                      Aqua Letifer
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #112

                                      @jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                      @Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                      I also think the tweet misses the point entirely. Yeah sure okay, that's what the hearings are about, but the problem on the table right now, the one we are and should be focusing on, isn't adherence to university harassment policies.

                                      Seems like Representative Stefancik missed the point.

                                      Are you of the opinion that anti-semitism isn't a concern at these universities, and that university policy is what we should be focusing on?

                                      Please love yourself.

                                      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • CopperC Offline
                                        CopperC Offline
                                        Copper
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #113

                                        The university presidents screwed up.

                                        They should have given the simple yes or no - 1 word.

                                        Why not? I think either way is legal and the fact that democrats now hate Jews is well known.

                                        They acted like a bunch of guilty teenagers.

                                        bachophileB 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

                                          @jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                          @Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                          I also think the tweet misses the point entirely. Yeah sure okay, that's what the hearings are about, but the problem on the table right now, the one we are and should be focusing on, isn't adherence to university harassment policies.

                                          Seems like Representative Stefancik missed the point.

                                          Are you of the opinion that anti-semitism isn't a concern at these universities, and that university policy is what we should be focusing on?

                                          jon-nycJ Online
                                          jon-nycJ Online
                                          jon-nyc
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #114

                                          @Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                          @jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                          @Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:

                                          I also think the tweet misses the point entirely. Yeah sure okay, that's what the hearings are about, but the problem on the table right now, the one we are and should be focusing on, isn't adherence to university harassment policies.

                                          Seems like Representative Stefancik missed the point.

                                          Are you of the opinion that anti-semitism isn't a concern at these universities, and that university policy is what we should be focusing on?

                                          Of course not. Again, Lemoine’s point was rather specific. I even said it was a bit of a nitpick when I posted it.

                                          You’re right that it’s beside the point. But maybe Stefanik could have gotten to the point?

                                          You were warned.

                                          Aqua LetiferA HoraceH 2 Replies Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups