Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Cancel culture strikes again

Cancel culture strikes again

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
61 Posts 17 Posters 786 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CopperC Online
    CopperC Online
    Copper
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    Do it

    Lock 'em up

    Retroactively would be great, get them all, every single one

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      So when are the mosques going to start coming down? I mean, Islam does have a history tied up with slavery, doesn’t it?

      The Brad

      1 Reply Last reply
      • RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        Indeed Islam does and in some places continues to do so. But that is an inconvenient truth best left alone.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • Catseye3C Offline
          Catseye3C Offline
          Catseye3
          wrote on last edited by Catseye3
          #31

          From Connecting Vets.Radio.com:

          "The Veterans' Memorial Preservation and Recognition Act of ➡ 2003 ⬅ establishes criminal penalties for anyone who "willfully injures or destroys, or attempts to injure or destroy ...veterans' memorials" including "any structure, plaque, statue or other monument on public property commemorating the service of any person or persons in the armed forces of the United States."

          Under that statute, anyone convicted of those acts could be fined and/or imprisoned for ➡ no more than 10 years, ⬅ or both."

          Oh, well. His heart's in the right place. 😑

          Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
          • IvorythumperI Offline
            IvorythumperI Offline
            Ivorythumper
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            Robert Downey Jr remains untouchable... good.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • Catseye3C Catseye3

              From Connecting Vets.Radio.com:

              "The Veterans' Memorial Preservation and Recognition Act of ➡ 2003 ⬅ establishes criminal penalties for anyone who "willfully injures or destroys, or attempts to injure or destroy ...veterans' memorials" including "any structure, plaque, statue or other monument on public property commemorating the service of any person or persons in the armed forces of the United States."

              Under that statute, anyone convicted of those acts could be fined and/or imprisoned for ➡ no more than 10 years, ⬅ or both."

              Oh, well. His heart's in the right place. 😑

              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              @Catseye3 said in Cancel culture strikes again:

              From Connecting Vets.Radio.com:

              "The Veterans' Memorial Preservation and Recognition Act of ➡ 2003 ⬅ establishes criminal penalties for anyone who "willfully injures or destroys, or attempts to injure or destroy ...veterans' memorials" including "any structure, plaque, statue or other monument on public property commemorating the service of any person or persons in the armed forces of the United States."

              Under that statute, anyone convicted of those acts could be fined and/or imprisoned for ➡ no more than 10 years, ⬅ or both."

              Oh, well. His heart's in the right place. 😑

              Cats, I don’t get your point. Trump says they can be sentenced up to 10 years, which is what the law states as well...Your post reads like you believe the law expired in 10 years. It didn’t, that was just the sentencing limit.

              The Brad

              1 Reply Last reply
              • Catseye3C Offline
                Catseye3C Offline
                Catseye3
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                @LuFins: No, that's not it. His tweet reads "I have authorized the Federal Government . . . " His authorization isn't needed. The authorization was in force at the moment the VMPA passed into law. He makes it sound like he reintroduced it somehow. He had nothing to do with it.

                The vandals committed criminal acts, and have not been apprehended. Unless they are identified and caught, his tweet is doubly pointless -- as is the threat of 10 years imprisonment.

                Sure sounds presidential, though!

                Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  I think his tweet says he authorizes the ARREST, and then from there the charges would follow the Act's punishment guidelines.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • Catseye3C Offline
                    Catseye3C Offline
                    Catseye3
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    His authorization for the arrest isn't needed; it's already in the law.

                    Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                    LuFins DadL JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                    • 89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      Then it reemphasizes it. 👍

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • Catseye3C Catseye3

                        His authorization for the arrest isn't needed; it's already in the law.

                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote on last edited by LuFins Dad
                        #38

                        @Catseye3 said in Cancel culture strikes again:

                        His authorization for the arrest isn't needed; it's already in the law.

                        Correct, but as the executive, the agencies generally follow his guidance regarding enforcement. To this point they have refrained from enforcing the law. Now he is instructing them to actively enforce and prosecute.

                        The Brad

                        Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
                        • Catseye3C Offline
                          Catseye3C Offline
                          Catseye3
                          wrote on last edited by Catseye3
                          #39

                          @ 89th: I'd go along with that if he hadn't said "I have authorized". If he'd reminded us of the act and that he wants it enforced more strongly or something, I'd be fine. But to me it sounds like he's trying to get credit for something he had nothing to do with -- trying to look all proactive and powerful and presidential.

                          Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                            @Catseye3 said in Cancel culture strikes again:

                            His authorization for the arrest isn't needed; it's already in the law.

                            Correct, but as the executive, the agencies generally follow his guidance regarding enforcement. To this point they have refrained from enforcing the law. Now he is instructing them to actively enforce and prosecute.

                            Catseye3C Offline
                            Catseye3C Offline
                            Catseye3
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #40

                            @LuFins-Dad How do we know they've refrained from enforcing the law? Why would they? Can it be that they don't know who to arrest because they don't know who the perps are?

                            Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                            89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                            • LarryL Offline
                              LarryL Offline
                              Larry
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #41

                              Who gives a flying fuck whether he needed to authorize it or not. The issue is there are people destroying our historical monuments, and so far nothing is being done to stop it. If it will help put a stop to this I don't give a rat's ass WHAT the man says.

                              Jesus.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • Catseye3C Catseye3

                                @LuFins-Dad How do we know they've refrained from enforcing the law? Why would they? Can it be that they don't know who to arrest because they don't know who the perps are?

                                89th8 Offline
                                89th8 Offline
                                89th
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #42

                                @Catseye3 said in Cancel culture strikes again:

                                @LuFins-Dad How do we know they've refrained from enforcing the law? Why would they? Can it be that they don't know who to arrest because they don't know who the perps are?

                                Have you seen any of the hundreds of videos? Heck, just the other night a line of cops stood a block away watching them tear down the Albert Pike statue in DC. Trump's tweet/whatever provides clearer instructions, as @LuFins-Dad said.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • Catseye3C Catseye3

                                  His authorization for the arrest isn't needed; it's already in the law.

                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  Jolly
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #43

                                  @Catseye3 said in Cancel culture strikes again:

                                  His authorization for the arrest isn't needed; it's already in the law.

                                  It's simple enough. POTUS is prodding elements of the government to follow the law, not ignore it.

                                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #44

                                    Yeah, “authorized” is the wrong word. But good on him all the same.

                                    Only non-witches get due process.

                                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • Catseye3C Offline
                                      Catseye3C Offline
                                      Catseye3
                                      wrote on last edited by Catseye3
                                      #45

                                      Okay, y'all win. 🙂

                                      Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                        Yeah, “authorized” is the wrong word. But good on him all the same.

                                        George KG Offline
                                        George KG Offline
                                        George K
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #46

                                        @jon-nyc said in Cancel culture strikes again:

                                        Yeah, “authorized” is the wrong word. But good on him all the same.

                                        Twitter flagged for being "threatening."

                                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Catseye3C Offline
                                          Catseye3C Offline
                                          Catseye3
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #47

                                          Spoken like a true prez of the people!

                                          Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                                          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups