Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Banning choke holds

Banning choke holds

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
15 Posts 8 Posters 88 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    It just all seems very logically precious to me. I have no real problem with not allowing choke holds either. I only think it's absurd to believe that the world is a predictably better place with cops who follow that rule. It would be good to train cops in effective martial arts which maximize ability to incapacitate without permanent damage.

    Education is extremely important.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      Loki
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      You can’t unsee a knee on a neck of someone who is already unconscious and handcuffed for several minutes. Clearly it’s a sanctioned procedure and no one would vote for that.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        I don't see any issue with it. Can't say I know what the costs and benefits are. But it's much better than disbanding the cops or not giving them weapons at all.

        89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        @jon-nyc said in Banning choke holds:

        I don't see any issue with it. Can't say I know what the costs and benefits are. But it's much better than disbanding the cops or not giving them weapons at all.

        While I agree with the latter. For me, if I were a cop and there was someone who was resisting arrest or (other scenario that requires using force to restrain the individual), if I'm not allowed to use a choke hold to maintain control, what's the next option... taser? Threaten with gun? Round house kick to the face? The choke hold seems to be the best of those options.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • CopperC Offline
          CopperC Offline
          Copper
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          Link to video

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Away
            MikM Away
            Mik
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            It's already banned in a number of places. I see it as a step in the right direction.

            “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

            1 Reply Last reply
            • LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Ban it.

              The Brad

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Banning it is so 1995.

                Let’s cancel them instead.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • CopperC Offline
                  CopperC Offline
                  Copper
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Or maybe lynch them.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Loki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    The New question of course is how do you immobilize someone such that they no longer are a safety threat. Apparently handcuffs are not enough. A net?

                    JollyJ 89th8 2 Replies Last reply
                    • HoraceH Offline
                      HoraceH Offline
                      Horace
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      Cops must have a judge's warrant to employ any force whatsoever. Otherwise all cooperation with cops is voluntary.

                      Education is extremely important.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • L Loki

                        The New question of course is how do you immobilize someone such that they no longer are a safety threat. Apparently handcuffs are not enough. A net?

                        JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @Loki said in Banning choke holds:

                        The New question of course is how do you immobilize someone such that they no longer are a safety threat. Apparently handcuffs are not enough. A net?

                        That's a really good question. Especially if the person is having a psychotic episode or is as high as a kite.

                        Any of you ever have to subdue somebody under those circumstances? Ain't easy.

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • L Loki

                          The New question of course is how do you immobilize someone such that they no longer are a safety threat. Apparently handcuffs are not enough. A net?

                          89th8 Offline
                          89th8 Offline
                          89th
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          @Loki said in Banning choke holds:

                          The New question of course is how do you immobilize someone such that they no longer are a safety threat. Apparently handcuffs are not enough. A net?

                          How is this the new question? This was literally my question when starting this thread! 😆

                          And yes, I vote bring back the cartoonish big dog catcher nets.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups