Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Redacted I guess

Redacted I guess

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
18 Posts 6 Posters 188 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
    #7

    They obviously aren’t going to tell the targets of the investigation what exactly they know, especially if a potential target has, well, a contentious relationship with the truth.

    They also would not want to out their source inside Mar Al Lago.

    Also remember the targets of the investigation probably include people other than trump. It wouldn’t be ok to release that info since they wouldn’t have had a chance to object first.

    All that leads to a lot of redactions. Pretty much everything we really want to know.

    But it will likely come out if there’s an indictment.

    "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
    -Cormac McCarthy

    CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      They obviously aren’t going to tell the targets of the investigation what exactly they know, especially if a potential target has, well, a contentious relationship with the truth.

      They also would not want to out their source inside Mar Al Lago.

      Also remember the targets of the investigation probably include people other than trump. It wouldn’t be ok to release that info since they wouldn’t have had a chance to object first.

      All that leads to a lot of redactions. Pretty much everything we really want to know.

      But it will likely come out if there’s an indictment.

      CopperC Offline
      CopperC Offline
      Copper
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      @jon-nyc said in Redacted I guess:

      They obviously aren’t going to tell the targets of the investigation what exactly they know

      Aren't they required to?

      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • CopperC Copper

        @jon-nyc said in Redacted I guess:

        They obviously aren’t going to tell the targets of the investigation what exactly they know

        Aren't they required to?

        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        @Copper

        No.

        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
        -Cormac McCarthy

        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          @Copper

          No.

          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          @jon-nyc said in Redacted I guess:

          @Copper

          No.

          THat's up to a grand jury, right?

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            @89th said in Redacted I guess:

            I mean, at least there is clarity that this is focused on the classified materials, plus anything else the search found. If any other government employee handled top secret classified information in that manner, they would be in jail. Just to be crystal clear.

            Better back up, cowboy.

            I've heard at least three different lawyers (including Turley) talk about how broad this warrant is and how it should have never been signed off on.

            Now, if that's the truth, it means this was definitely a fishing expedition. I'm sorry, but we don't do that with a former President in this country. Maybe in a banana republic, but not in America.

            89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            @Jolly said in Redacted I guess:

            @89th said in Redacted I guess:

            I mean, at least there is clarity that this is focused on the classified materials, plus anything else the search found. If any other government employee handled top secret classified information in that manner, they would be in jail. Just to be crystal clear.

            Better back up, cowboy.

            If we ever grab drinks in person I’ll tell you how I know.

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              LOL...

              FbHqEH0VUAAT8IJ.jpeg

              That said, it's not surprising that Trump is demanding that ALL of the affidavit be released, unredacted, knowing that that will never happen because of security issues.

              He's pandering.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Yep.

                And raking in campaign money with both hands.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 89th

                  @Jolly said in Redacted I guess:

                  @89th said in Redacted I guess:

                  I mean, at least there is clarity that this is focused on the classified materials, plus anything else the search found. If any other government employee handled top secret classified information in that manner, they would be in jail. Just to be crystal clear.

                  Better back up, cowboy.

                  If we ever grab drinks in person I’ll tell you how I know.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  @89th said in Redacted I guess:

                  @Jolly said in Redacted I guess:

                  @89th said in Redacted I guess:

                  I mean, at least there is clarity that this is focused on the classified materials, plus anything else the search found. If any other government employee handled top secret classified information in that manner, they would be in jail. Just to be crystal clear.

                  Better back up, cowboy.

                  If we ever grab drinks in person I’ll tell you how I know.

                  If we ever have drinks in person, I'll tell you about the body a FBI agent dumped in the Mississippi.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG George K

                    LOL...

                    FbHqEH0VUAAT8IJ.jpeg

                    That said, it's not surprising that Trump is demanding that ALL of the affidavit be released, unredacted, knowing that that will never happen because of security issues.

                    He's pandering.

                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    @George-K said in Redacted I guess:

                    LOL...

                    FbHqEH0VUAAT8IJ.jpeg

                    That said, it's not surprising that Trump is demanding that ALL of the affidavit be released, unredacted, knowing that that will never happen because of security issues.

                    He's pandering.

                    It’s a balancing act. They actually tampered down the volume of the requests for release. They want to be seen as aggrieved victims but they don’t want the actual accusations known.

                    "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                    -Cormac McCarthy

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      alt text

                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • MikM Offline
                        MikM Offline
                        Mik
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        alt text

                        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups