Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Spot the threat to free speech

Spot the threat to free speech

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
106 Posts 15 Posters 3.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LarryL Offline
    LarryL Offline
    Larry
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    I agree.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • AxtremusA Offline
      AxtremusA Offline
      Axtremus
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      Oh, if only Trump would boycott Twitter.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • LarryL Offline
        LarryL Offline
        Larry
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        He would still get reelected, because the democrats have embraced a failed ideology and are running a moron for president.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • L Loki

          We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

          Second the right to free speech as a person is not the right of anonymous entity to spew polarizing garbage to millions of people. I don’t think the Constitution provides protection for that.

          HoraceH Online
          HoraceH Online
          Horace
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

          We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

          And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

          Education is extremely important.

          L MikM 2 Replies Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            @Loki To be serious I'm dead-dog certain there have been court cases on whether you lose your right to free speech if publishing anonymously and there's no way the courts would have ever allowed that. I think if you reflected on it for a while you wouldn't be for it either.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Loki
            wrote on last edited by
            #37

            @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

            @Loki To be serious I'm dead-dog certain there have been court cases on whether you lose your right to free speech if publishing anonymously and there's no way the courts would have ever allowed that. I think if you reflected on it for a while you wouldn't be for it either.

            Well it’s not the anonymous person that I was thinking about in general but does that North Korean operative in Pyongyang have the right to free speech on Twitter and Facebook?

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Horace

              @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

              We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

              And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Loki
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              @Horace said in Spot the threat to free speech:

              @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

              We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

              And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

              Let’s assume for a second that certain other countries have a vested interest in polarizing our country, which ones are targeting liberals?

              1 Reply Last reply
              • LarryL Larry

                Free speech means free speech. In my way of seeing that, it's none of the courts' business.

                taiwan_girlT Online
                taiwan_girlT Online
                taiwan_girl
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                @Larry said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                Free speech means free speech. In my way of seeing that, it's none of the courts' business.

                But there are limits to free speech. I will admit that I am not a constitution expert, but I do know that "free speech" is not 100% free.

                I cannot yell "FIRE" in a crowded movie theater.
                If untrue, I cannot posting everywhere that my neighbor is a sex molestor.

                (I guess I could, but there would be consequences.)

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  For the record I think Twitter was idiotic for doing this, best case it will achieve the opposite of what they hoped. That’s the best case.

                  taiwan_girlT Online
                  taiwan_girlT Online
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                  For the record I think Twitter was idiotic for doing this, best case it will achieve the opposite of what they hoped. That’s the best case.

                  True, but this situation should never have happened. There are so so so many things going on in the world that President Trump should be focusing on.

                  Spending his time and energy posting tweets on the death of someone 19 years ago that (as far as I know) has been shown to be a natural death, seems to be a gigantic waste of time, energy, and he should be spending his time more productively.

                  LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Horace

                    @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                    We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

                    And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

                    MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    @Horace said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                    @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                    We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

                    And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

                    There it is, right there. It only works if we let it and accept the characterization of the other side as devils.

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                      @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                      For the record I think Twitter was idiotic for doing this, best case it will achieve the opposite of what they hoped. That’s the best case.

                      True, but this situation should never have happened. There are so so so many things going on in the world that President Trump should be focusing on.

                      Spending his time and energy posting tweets on the death of someone 19 years ago that (as far as I know) has been shown to be a natural death, seems to be a gigantic waste of time, energy, and he should be spending his time more productively.

                      LarryL Offline
                      LarryL Offline
                      Larry
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      @taiwan_girl said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                      @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                      For the record I think Twitter was idiotic for doing this, best case it will achieve the opposite of what they hoped. That’s the best case.

                      True, but this situation should never have happened. There are so so so many things going on in the world that President Trump should be focusing on.

                      Spending his time and energy posting tweets on the death of someone 19 years ago that (as far as I know) has been shown to be a natural death, seems to be a gigantic waste of time, energy, and he should be spending his time more productively.

                      Back when he tweeted that he was being spied on, his detractors were busy saying what you just said. When it was proven to be true that he was being spied on and he had been correct all along, crickets. It's been the same every time - Trump tweets something, his detractors jump on him over it, then later on the reason he did it becomes clear and his detractors move on to some other reason he's no good.

                      "Spend his time more productively"....... lol you must not know about all the things he's accomplished..

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • X xenon

                        So much intellectual scaffolding has to be built around this man’s statements.

                        KlausK Offline
                        KlausK Offline
                        Klaus
                        wrote on last edited by Klaus
                        #43

                        @xenon said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                        So much intellectual scaffolding has to be built around this man’s statements.

                        Any guesses what those "big actions" are? Is that just an empty threat? Would could he actually do? I mean, he is the POTUS after all, so presumably there's something he could do.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • 89th8 Offline
                          89th8 Offline
                          89th
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #44

                          No actions will happen. Twitter made a move, the President is whining, "freedom of speech" is such an overused phrase and isn't relevant....yet. If the President does take "big actions" then yes, he may be violating freedom of speech rights, ironically.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • LarryL Offline
                            LarryL Offline
                            Larry
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            I can't think of anything that is MORE relevant than protecting the right to speak freely. Maybe it doesn't bother you to have big corporations control what does and does not get said, but it bothers me.

                            89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                            • LarryL Offline
                              LarryL Offline
                              Larry
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #46

                              IMG_20200519_121053.jpg

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • LarryL Larry

                                I can't think of anything that is MORE relevant than protecting the right to speak freely. Maybe it doesn't bother you to have big corporations control what does and does not get said, but it bothers me.

                                89th8 Offline
                                89th8 Offline
                                89th
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #47

                                @Larry said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                I can't think of anything that is MORE relevant than protecting the right to speak freely. Maybe it doesn't bother you to have big corporations control what does and does not get said, but it bothers me.

                                I'm referring to the freedom of speech as outlined in the constitution, which is mainly focused on preventing congress from making a law that limits free speech. Pretty sure the dummies in the Twitter front office aren't congress.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                  @Copper said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                  @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                  The need for it was diminished with cable, and died with the internet.

                                  I think that is the question, has Twitter gotten to the size that once again raises the need?

                                  Ironically Mr. Trump has probably influenced it's size.

                                  Twitter is like 7th largest social media site, excluding the foreign ones that aren't in use here.

                                  If twitter is too large and needs the government to control its content surely Fox News does too.

                                  CopperC Offline
                                  CopperC Offline
                                  Copper
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #48

                                  @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                  If twitter is too large and needs the government to control its content surely Fox News does too.

                                  Fox makes up its own content, a provider.

                                  Users make up content for Twitter, a utility.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • taiwan_girlT Online
                                    taiwan_girlT Online
                                    taiwan_girl
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #49

                                    In this case, how did Twitter limit the free speech of President Trump?

                                    He put out a tweet. Nothing was censored. It was allowed in real time. Etc etc

                                    LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor Phibes
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #50

                                      It's interesting how quickly "conservatives" start talking about stifling the free market when it doesn't behave how they want it to.

                                      I was only joking

                                      RainmanR 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • CopperC Offline
                                        CopperC Offline
                                        Copper
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #51

                                        Not Twitter and not Mr. Trump, but maybe part of the discussion

                                        I just noticed this partially censored post on Facebook

                                        Why even bother censoring this?

                                        ![alt text](7e36466a-ae4e-4a3c-8b05-24b5c52b2b10-image.png image url)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                          It's interesting how quickly "conservatives" start talking about stifling the free market when it doesn't behave how they want it to.

                                          RainmanR Offline
                                          RainmanR Offline
                                          Rainman
                                          wrote on last edited by Rainman
                                          #52

                                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                          It's interesting how quickly "conservatives" start talking about stifling the free market when it doesn't behave how they want it to.

                                          Well, I'm somewhat conservative, and I do not want to stifle the free market.
                                          Ohyeah??
                                          How about: Progressives don't want to stifle the free market, because they don't want a free market to begin with.
                                          Stick that under your porch and try to sweep it.

                                          emoji goes here --> but KLAUS I can't use emojis.
                                          Klaus must hate Americans. That must be it.
                                          How about Ax? Can he fix it?
                                          Why is everyone stifling my access to emojis???????
                                          😞 <-- I added that one the old fashioned way.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups