Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Spot the threat to free speech

Spot the threat to free speech

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
106 Posts 15 Posters 3.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LarryL Offline
    LarryL Offline
    Larry
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    Nope. I'm saying that Twitter tried to limit Trumps free speech, and he has a right to strike back. No, he has an obligation to strike back. We all have the same obligation. If you don't fight against attempts to limit freedom of speech, you will lose it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LarryL Offline
      LarryL Offline
      Larry
      wrote on last edited by
      #28

      Free speech means free speech. In my way of seeing that, it's none of the courts' business.

      jon-nycJ taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
      • X Offline
        X Offline
        xenon
        wrote on last edited by xenon
        #29

        Right - but there's a more basic issue at play here first.

        Twitter is more akin to a bar.

        The barkeep reigns supreme in the bar and can tell you to GTFO whenever they want. That's not a first amendment issue.

        Do we want government to regulate social media as a first step?

        LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
        • LarryL Larry

          Free speech means free speech. In my way of seeing that, it's none of the courts' business.

          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #30

          @Larry said in Spot the threat to free speech:

          Free speech means free speech. In my way of seeing that, it's none of the courts' business.

          Well, the courts only get involved when the government tries to limit it. So, if you believe in free speech the courts are your friend.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          1 Reply Last reply
          • X xenon

            Right - but there's a more basic issue at play here first.

            Twitter is more akin to a bar.

            The barkeep reigns supreme in the bar and can tell you to GTFO whenever they want. That's not a first amendment issue.

            Do we want government to regulate social media as a first step?

            LarryL Offline
            LarryL Offline
            Larry
            wrote on last edited by
            #31

            @xenon said in Spot the threat to free speech:

            Right - but there's a more basic issue at play here first.

            Twitter is more akin to a bar.

            The barkeep reigns supreme in the bar and can tell you to GTFO whenever they want. That's not a first amendment issue.

            Do we want government to regulate social media as a first step?

            The bar analogy doesn't work for me because of the size and reach of Twitter.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #32

              For the record I think Twitter was idiotic for doing this, best case it will achieve the opposite of what they hoped. That’s the best case.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
              • LarryL Offline
                LarryL Offline
                Larry
                wrote on last edited by
                #33

                I agree.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • AxtremusA Offline
                  AxtremusA Offline
                  Axtremus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #34

                  Oh, if only Trump would boycott Twitter.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • LarryL Offline
                    LarryL Offline
                    Larry
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #35

                    He would still get reelected, because the democrats have embraced a failed ideology and are running a moron for president.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • L Loki

                      We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

                      Second the right to free speech as a person is not the right of anonymous entity to spew polarizing garbage to millions of people. I don’t think the Constitution provides protection for that.

                      HoraceH Offline
                      HoraceH Offline
                      Horace
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #36

                      @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                      We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

                      And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

                      Education is extremely important.

                      L MikM 2 Replies Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        @Loki To be serious I'm dead-dog certain there have been court cases on whether you lose your right to free speech if publishing anonymously and there's no way the courts would have ever allowed that. I think if you reflected on it for a while you wouldn't be for it either.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Loki
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #37

                        @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                        @Loki To be serious I'm dead-dog certain there have been court cases on whether you lose your right to free speech if publishing anonymously and there's no way the courts would have ever allowed that. I think if you reflected on it for a while you wouldn't be for it either.

                        Well it’s not the anonymous person that I was thinking about in general but does that North Korean operative in Pyongyang have the right to free speech on Twitter and Facebook?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • HoraceH Horace

                          @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                          We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

                          And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Loki
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #38

                          @Horace said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                          @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                          We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

                          And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

                          Let’s assume for a second that certain other countries have a vested interest in polarizing our country, which ones are targeting liberals?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • LarryL Larry

                            Free speech means free speech. In my way of seeing that, it's none of the courts' business.

                            taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girl
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #39

                            @Larry said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                            Free speech means free speech. In my way of seeing that, it's none of the courts' business.

                            But there are limits to free speech. I will admit that I am not a constitution expert, but I do know that "free speech" is not 100% free.

                            I cannot yell "FIRE" in a crowded movie theater.
                            If untrue, I cannot posting everywhere that my neighbor is a sex molestor.

                            (I guess I could, but there would be consequences.)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              For the record I think Twitter was idiotic for doing this, best case it will achieve the opposite of what they hoped. That’s the best case.

                              taiwan_girlT Offline
                              taiwan_girlT Offline
                              taiwan_girl
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #40

                              @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                              For the record I think Twitter was idiotic for doing this, best case it will achieve the opposite of what they hoped. That’s the best case.

                              True, but this situation should never have happened. There are so so so many things going on in the world that President Trump should be focusing on.

                              Spending his time and energy posting tweets on the death of someone 19 years ago that (as far as I know) has been shown to be a natural death, seems to be a gigantic waste of time, energy, and he should be spending his time more productively.

                              LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
                              • HoraceH Horace

                                @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

                                And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

                                MikM Offline
                                MikM Offline
                                Mik
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #41

                                @Horace said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                @Loki said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                We’ve created social platforms that are a perfect host for outside influences to polarize our society. Much of twitter and Facebook is not Americans expressing their right to free speech but meddling and manipulating. The evidence for this in bots is quite clear.

                                And the thing being exploited here is each individual's eagerness to pounce when the other tribe is seen to be crazy or stupid or evil. The best way to immunize ourselves against those trolls is to stop being so eager to do that.

                                There it is, right there. It only works if we let it and accept the characterization of the other side as devils.

                                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                  @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                  For the record I think Twitter was idiotic for doing this, best case it will achieve the opposite of what they hoped. That’s the best case.

                                  True, but this situation should never have happened. There are so so so many things going on in the world that President Trump should be focusing on.

                                  Spending his time and energy posting tweets on the death of someone 19 years ago that (as far as I know) has been shown to be a natural death, seems to be a gigantic waste of time, energy, and he should be spending his time more productively.

                                  LarryL Offline
                                  LarryL Offline
                                  Larry
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #42

                                  @taiwan_girl said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                  @jon-nyc said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                  For the record I think Twitter was idiotic for doing this, best case it will achieve the opposite of what they hoped. That’s the best case.

                                  True, but this situation should never have happened. There are so so so many things going on in the world that President Trump should be focusing on.

                                  Spending his time and energy posting tweets on the death of someone 19 years ago that (as far as I know) has been shown to be a natural death, seems to be a gigantic waste of time, energy, and he should be spending his time more productively.

                                  Back when he tweeted that he was being spied on, his detractors were busy saying what you just said. When it was proven to be true that he was being spied on and he had been correct all along, crickets. It's been the same every time - Trump tweets something, his detractors jump on him over it, then later on the reason he did it becomes clear and his detractors move on to some other reason he's no good.

                                  "Spend his time more productively"....... lol you must not know about all the things he's accomplished..

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • X xenon

                                    So much intellectual scaffolding has to be built around this man’s statements.

                                    KlausK Offline
                                    KlausK Offline
                                    Klaus
                                    wrote on last edited by Klaus
                                    #43

                                    @xenon said in Spot the threat to free speech:

                                    So much intellectual scaffolding has to be built around this man’s statements.

                                    Any guesses what those "big actions" are? Is that just an empty threat? Would could he actually do? I mean, he is the POTUS after all, so presumably there's something he could do.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • 89th8 Offline
                                      89th8 Offline
                                      89th
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #44

                                      No actions will happen. Twitter made a move, the President is whining, "freedom of speech" is such an overused phrase and isn't relevant....yet. If the President does take "big actions" then yes, he may be violating freedom of speech rights, ironically.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • LarryL Offline
                                        LarryL Offline
                                        Larry
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #45

                                        I can't think of anything that is MORE relevant than protecting the right to speak freely. Maybe it doesn't bother you to have big corporations control what does and does not get said, but it bothers me.

                                        89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • LarryL Offline
                                          LarryL Offline
                                          Larry
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #46

                                          IMG_20200519_121053.jpg

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups