Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars

Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
38 Posts 12 Posters 490 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    I remember a few years back a drunk driver sued the bar that served him after he got injured after falling off his stupid motorbike. What a cock.

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

      Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

      Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

      The Brad

      CopperC Doctor PhibesD RenaudaR 3 Replies Last reply
      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

        Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

        Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

        Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

        CopperC Offline
        CopperC Offline
        Copper
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

        Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

        Great ideas, thanks

        1 Reply Last reply
        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

          Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

          Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

          Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

          Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

          Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

          Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

          Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

          There's been an ever increasing level of safety legislation in cars over the last few decades, and if you look at the death rates, it's worked. I'd be willing to bet that there was resistance to almost every improvement from some quarters.

          325547b9-eb13-4125-b930-2656ea9b68d4-image.png

          I was only joking

          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Mik

            It’s really not freedom vs safety. It’s rights vs responsibilities.

            JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            @mik said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

            It’s really not freedom vs safety. It’s rights vs responsibilities.

            Isn't that part of the equation?

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

              @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

              Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

              Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

              Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

              There's been an ever increasing level of safety legislation in cars over the last few decades, and if you look at the death rates, it's worked. I'd be willing to bet that there was resistance to almost every improvement from some quarters.

              325547b9-eb13-4125-b930-2656ea9b68d4-image.png

              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              @doctor-phibes said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

              @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

              Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

              Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

              Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

              There's been an ever increasing level of safety legislation in cars over the last few decades, and if you look at the death rates, it's worked. I'd be willing to bet that there was resistance to almost every improvement from some quarters.

              325547b9-eb13-4125-b930-2656ea9b68d4-image.png

              I would say there is a massive difference between crumple zones, airbag standards, and child restraints vs. the car not liking how you are driving and pulling over…

              The Brad

              1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Jolly

                It's a simple choice, really.

                Freedom vs. safety.

                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girl
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                It's a simple choice, really.

                Freedom vs. safety.

                I agree. Again, you have to compromise to live in a civilized society.

                You want 100% personal freedom to do what you want? Check out Eritrea, or a country like that.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  It's a simple choice, really.

                  Freedom vs. safety.

                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                  It's a simple choice, really.

                  Freedom vs. safety.

                  Not exactly. Driving a motor vehicle on public roads is an earned privilege that comes with accountability. If you drink, don’t drive.

                  Elbows up!

                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                  • RenaudaR Renauda

                    @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                    It's a simple choice, really.

                    Freedom vs. safety.

                    Not exactly. Driving a motor vehicle on public roads is an earned privilege that comes with accountability. If you drink, don’t drive.

                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    @renauda said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                    @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                    It's a simple choice, really.

                    Freedom vs. safety.

                    Not exactly. Driving a motor vehicle on public roads is an earned privilege that comes with accountability. If you drink, don’t drive.

                    I agree. What I don’t agree with is the assumption of guilt that must be disproven to be allowed to drive.

                    The Brad

                    RenaudaR KlausK 2 Replies Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                      @renauda said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                      @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                      It's a simple choice, really.

                      Freedom vs. safety.

                      Not exactly. Driving a motor vehicle on public roads is an earned privilege that comes with accountability. If you drink, don’t drive.

                      I agree. What I don’t agree with is the assumption of guilt that must be disproven to be allowed to drive.

                      RenaudaR Offline
                      RenaudaR Offline
                      Renauda
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      @lufins-dad

                      Then what’s the issue here?

                      Elbows up!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        I hope they perfect self driving cars by then.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                          @renauda said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                          @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                          It's a simple choice, really.

                          Freedom vs. safety.

                          Not exactly. Driving a motor vehicle on public roads is an earned privilege that comes with accountability. If you drink, don’t drive.

                          I agree. What I don’t agree with is the assumption of guilt that must be disproven to be allowed to drive.

                          KlausK Offline
                          KlausK Offline
                          Klaus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                          I agree. What I don’t agree with is the assumption of guilt that must be disproven to be allowed to drive.

                          This.

                          I don't think I've ever driven while drunk, but if I'd had to buy a car with a device for detection, my first course of action would be to find a way to disable it.

                          I'm very much against the government micro-managing my life. I want a society of adults who can take care of themselves, not a society of kids who needs constant protection from themselves.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            F0712AE5-1CB7-499E-8F2E-C7B3E9E71499.jpeg

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                              Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                              Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

                              Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

                              RenaudaR Offline
                              RenaudaR Offline
                              Renauda
                              wrote on last edited by Renauda
                              #27

                              @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                              Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                              It may very well Bev absurd, but take into account the costs of drunk driving to the insurance industry. You can be rest assured civil interest groups such as MADD are the small lobbyists pushing for these regulations. My money is on the insurance industry to be the prime mover behind this and similar safety regulations. It would try such on its own but knows that it is much better to get the legislators on board and enact appropriate legislation. It’s a big win for insurers given the current medical and civil costs of drunk driving to the insurance industry.

                              As always, follow the money.

                              Elbows up!

                              LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                              • RenaudaR Renauda

                                @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                                It may very well Bev absurd, but take into account the costs of drunk driving to the insurance industry. You can be rest assured civil interest groups such as MADD are the small lobbyists pushing for these regulations. My money is on the insurance industry to be the prime mover behind this and similar safety regulations. It would try such on its own but knows that it is much better to get the legislators on board and enact appropriate legislation. It’s a big win for insurers given the current medical and civil costs of drunk driving to the insurance industry.

                                As always, follow the money.

                                LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins Dad
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                @renauda said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                                It may very well absurd, but take into account the costs of drunk driving to the insurance industry. You can be rest assured civil interest groups such as MADD are a small lobbyists pushing for these regulations. My money is on the insurance industry to be the prime mover behind this and similar safety regulations. It would try such on its own but knows that it is much better to get the legislators on board and enact appropriate legislation. It’s a big win for insurers given the current medical and civil costs of drunk driving to the insurance industry.

                                As always, follow the money.

                                So are the end results lower premiums for customers or record profits for the insurers?

                                The Brad

                                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                • MikM Offline
                                  MikM Offline
                                  Mik
                                  wrote on last edited by Mik
                                  #29

                                  I'm agnostic on this - whether it is good or bad remains to be seen. It could be something great depending on how it is implemented.

                                  Scenario - you are camping pretty far out. You and all your buddies are drinking and someone gets hurt. How do you get help?

                                  You are the designated driver, all your friends are drunk. How does the car determine that only the passengers have been drinking?

                                  All these things have to be thought out.

                                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                  Doctor PhibesD LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
                                  • MikM Mik

                                    I'm agnostic on this - whether it is good or bad remains to be seen. It could be something great depending on how it is implemented.

                                    Scenario - you are camping pretty far out. You and all your buddies are drinking and someone gets hurt. How do you get help?

                                    You are the designated driver, all your friends are drunk. How does the car determine that only the passengers have been drinking?

                                    All these things have to be thought out.

                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor Phibes
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @mik said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                    I'm agnostic on this - whether it is good or bad remains to be seen. It could be something great depending on how it is implemented.

                                    Yeah, that's kind of how I feel, too.

                                    There's no point getting all over-excited about something when we don't know the details of how it works.

                                    I was only joking

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • CopperC Offline
                                      CopperC Offline
                                      Copper
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #31

                                      Yup, blood alcohol content is a pretty good indicator, but it is not the same for everyone

                                      Assuming the democrats put the energy industry out of business,
                                      by the time this gets implemented there won't be any more cars to worry about.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                        @renauda said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                        @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                        Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                                        It may very well absurd, but take into account the costs of drunk driving to the insurance industry. You can be rest assured civil interest groups such as MADD are a small lobbyists pushing for these regulations. My money is on the insurance industry to be the prime mover behind this and similar safety regulations. It would try such on its own but knows that it is much better to get the legislators on board and enact appropriate legislation. It’s a big win for insurers given the current medical and civil costs of drunk driving to the insurance industry.

                                        As always, follow the money.

                                        So are the end results lower premiums for customers or record profits for the insurers?

                                        RenaudaR Offline
                                        RenaudaR Offline
                                        Renauda
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #32

                                        @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                        So are the end results lower premiums for customers or record profits for the insurers?

                                        Lower premiums? Almost certainly once most vehicles on the road are equipped with the technology and statistics shows its efficacy.

                                        Record profits? As always banks and insurance companies do not lose money.

                                        Elbows up!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nyc
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #33

                                          I'm going to market little cans of compressed breath with a mouth shaped top for drunks to use to get around the breathalyzer.

                                          Only non-witches get due process.

                                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                          HoraceH taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups