National Review: "Is Joe OK?"
-
"I would vote for a soup can before I would vote for Trump." It came off as a joke, but what, did you think TDS sufferers felt differently? Do you honestly believe that elderly white progressive females and feminized men would choose Trump over anybody else? Literally? And did you think there was a more electable soup can than Biden? No, "Never Trump" really did mean, "anybody but Trump". So, this is anybody. One could find in this situation the perils of emotional thinking, if one was inclined to.
-
What's absolutely fascinating to me is the strong implication that Joe being unable to do the job is a new idea. Because democrats are just now deciding that that would be reasonable to question. No one else has ever brought this up before. Nope, never.
Like I said, we politicized reality.
-
@aqua-letifer said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
What's absolutely fascinating to me is the strong implication that Joe being unable to do the job is a new idea. Because democrats are just now deciding that that would be reasonable to question. No one else has ever brought this up before. Nope, never.
On the chance that you're not being sarcastic, don't you remember all the conversations about the 25th amendment and Trump?
-
@george-k said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
On the chance that you're not being sarcastic, don't you remember all the conversations about the 25th amendment and Trump?
I'm not even being sarcastic. I'm channeling the Democrat story as I've read it. They mean this in earnest.
-
@aqua-letifer said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
What's absolutely fascinating to me is the strong implication that Joe being unable to do the job is a new idea. Because democrats are just now deciding that that would be reasonable to question. No one else has ever brought this up before. Nope, never.
Like I said, we politicized reality.
To be fair, if you follow the MSM and the usual outlets middle-to-left people like to follow, none that I know of broached the subject of Biden's mental fitness to do the job.
Shucks, I said during the debates he was up.
-
@aqua-letifer said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
@george-k said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
On the chance that you're not being sarcastic, don't you remember all the conversations about the 25th amendment and Trump?
I'm not even being sarcastic. I'm channeling the Democrat story as I've read it. They mean this in earnest. Which to me is incredible.
-
@aqua-letifer said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
I'm not even being sarcastic. I'm channeling the Democrat story as I've read it. They mean this in earnest.
The push to invoke the 25th for Trump was because he was a) an asshole and b) people didn't like him. There was some talk about his mental stability (by people who never examined him, of course), but not because he was incompetent.
So, this is an interesting place we're at. Let's assume that Biden is incompetent (I know, I know). Let's assume that he's not doing a good job (I know, I know).
So, what are the constitutional means for removing him from office? Other than the 25th, the only other alternative is impeachment and convictiion, which, as we saw twice in the last 4 years, is a high bar.
If you want to remove him from office, the 25th is the only way. It would be interesting to see whether VPOTUS and the cabinet think that this is viable. My guess is no, let
Edith Wilsonhis handlers continue to run the government they'd say. -
@jolly said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
@89th said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s having a bit of an internal meltdown over this debacle.
Biden? He's like a dog that chases cars all his life and finally caught one.
Haha great analogy….and nice reference from The Dark Knight
-
@george-k said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
The push to invoke the 25th for Trump was because he was a) an asshole and b) people didn't like him. There was some talk about his mental stability (by people who never examined him, of course), but not because he was incompetent.
IIRC the talk of the 25th was after he incited a citizen uprising against the election process?
-
@george-k said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
@89th said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
IIRC the talk of the 25th was after he incited a citizen uprising against the election process?
No. It surfaced during the 1st year of Trump's term. It was moot after Jan 6.
Oh ok. I guess I only really considered the possibility of its use after Jan 6th (and I supported it, too).
-
@jolly said in National Review: "Is Joe OK?":
Which is why you were an uninformed idiot.
Loveable, but an idiot.
How so? Do a quick Google search for “Trump 25th” and you’ll see all coverage was about it’s use in January of this year, which like I said is when the possibility of it’s use actually gained some traction.
-
-
Joe Biden is a feeble, demented, senile old man, kind of like most of us here.
He has no business being president.
Everyone knows this.
The change that seems to be beginning now is that some in the MSM seem ready to say this obvious story out loud.
Once this catches on, the cry to make a female black person president, will be deafening.