@jon-nyc said in Oops....:
The canvassing process always fixes errors. It is rare that they are of the magnitude that changes an apparent winner.
But knowing that the canvassing quite literally always finds errors, we should not presume fraud for those, and only those, that break against our preferred candidate.
Fraud should never be allowed, for any candidate.
25 years minimum, at hard labor, sounds about right.
Of course, aren't you the same guy who didn't mind lies in a FISA court? I could be mistaken...
At the end if the day, it all boils down to the same thing. You either trust the system or not. For the system to be trusted, it must be as error-free as humanly possible.