@doctor-phibes said in America's Paper of Record v America's Paper of Record:
@horace said in America's Paper of Record v America's Paper of Record:
@doctor-phibes said in America's Paper of Record v America's Paper of Record:
If a leftie comedy sight did this you guys would be posting pictures of fainting couches before I could say 'How dare you!'
Not if the accusation was for stuff that gets people or media outlets banned from all social media, or that advertisers run screaming from.
You want to equate this to fair play ribbing, but the point of a defamation suit is in the potential for economic damage. There's an obvious connection between this particular accusation and potential economic damage.
Well, I think it's a bloody shame that they've resorted to this.
If you want to be treated as an edgy, down-with-the-hip-folks, comedy website, your first reaction when somebody says something you don't like should not be to threaten a lawsuit. That's the action of a fat old bastard who isn't funny.
By doing this, the Babylon Bee is revealing themselves. They're not edgy and funny. They're a bunch of guys who resort to lawyers because they're worried it might affect their stock value.
Let the world be notified. If you want Phibes to think you're funny, you can not use legal avenues to defend against defamation by hugely influential media sources.
Meanwhile, they're definitely funny, and edgy enough at least to be falsely accused by the Paper of Record of being a hard right disinformation site.
And good luck when somebody sues you right back for making jokes about smelling hair essentially making you a pedophile, or something.
I'm sure they'd have good luck with such a frivolous lawsuit brought against them. I hope they have good luck with this one they're bringing against the NYT, which is not frivolous within the context of the cancel culture of the left.