What are you reading now?
-
Finished
Kind of uneven - plot is good, detail that is interspersed is good, but I thought the lead character was particularly not credible - but it was an engaging morality play.
-
-
Are there any dirty bits?
@doctor-phibes said in What are you reading now?:
Are there any dirty bits?
You mean, "Does it have the 'Right Stuff'?"
-
@doctor-phibes said in What are you reading now?:
Are there any dirty bits?
You mean, "Does it have the 'Right Stuff'?"
@george-k said in What are you reading now?:
@doctor-phibes said in What are you reading now?:
Are there any dirty bits?
You mean, "Does it have the 'Right Stuff'?"
For Phibes, I think he's referencing the Right Stiff.
-
Let me know what you think about that Ken. I respected his writing during the Iraq war years ago.
@jon-nyc I just finished it. I heard Packer discussing this book on a podcast which is why I thought about reading this book.
He divides the country into 4 major categories Smart America (the meritocracy), Just America (social justice youth), Free America (libertarian types) and Real America (traditionalists - ala Sarah Palin). He does a decent analysis of how these groups developed - goes back prior to the Civil War.
One of his major premises for why we are where we are is that the happy days of post WWII where we were the shining city on the hill with economic opportunity for all is not quite as true in the front half of the twenty-first century.
He talks about the the politicization of Covid, not pleased with what DJT did with that and goes into some detail.
He does also has some brief bios of Frances Perkins, Andrew Greeley, and A Philip Randolph.
There's a lot of territory covered. He's a leftist but with plenty of abuse of wokeness and idiocy for the Smart America group. If you like Sam Harris, this would be on the same shelf. I think this is easily as good as his last book.
-
@jon-nyc I just finished it. I heard Packer discussing this book on a podcast which is why I thought about reading this book.
He divides the country into 4 major categories Smart America (the meritocracy), Just America (social justice youth), Free America (libertarian types) and Real America (traditionalists - ala Sarah Palin). He does a decent analysis of how these groups developed - goes back prior to the Civil War.
One of his major premises for why we are where we are is that the happy days of post WWII where we were the shining city on the hill with economic opportunity for all is not quite as true in the front half of the twenty-first century.
He talks about the the politicization of Covid, not pleased with what DJT did with that and goes into some detail.
He does also has some brief bios of Frances Perkins, Andrew Greeley, and A Philip Randolph.
There's a lot of territory covered. He's a leftist but with plenty of abuse of wokeness and idiocy for the Smart America group. If you like Sam Harris, this would be on the same shelf. I think this is easily as good as his last book.
-
@kluurs said in What are you reading now?:
I couldn't abide this one. She writes as if she assumes her readers are imbeciles. Or maybe 10 years old.
.
.
.
.
This one I loved. Also it has better practical knowledge. It's interesting that the "scientific consensus", and in particular the officially supported one from the governmental authorities, is still so wrong about weight loss. (Says a lot about "scientific consensus" in general.) There shouldn't be any reasonable doubt anymore that low carb diets are the best general approach. I was amused how Taubes, near the end of the book, gave a middle finger to diet books in general when he begrudgingly gave some simple diet advice: tape up on your refrigerator a one-page dietary outline given in a 1951 endocrinology textbook. It basically says to avoid carbs.
-
@kluurs said in What are you reading now?:
I couldn't abide this one. She writes as if she assumes her readers are imbeciles. Or maybe 10 years old.
.
.
.
.This one I loved. Also it has better practical knowledge. It's interesting that the "scientific consensus", and in particular the officially supported one from the governmental authorities, is still so wrong about weight loss. (Says a lot about "scientific consensus" in general.) There shouldn't be any reasonable doubt anymore that low carb diets are the best general approach. I was amused how Taubes, near the end of the book, gave a middle finger to diet books in general when he begrudgingly gave some simple diet advice: tape up on your refrigerator a one-page dietary outline given in a 1951 endocrinology textbook. It basically says to avoid carbs.
-
I am amused by the disclaimer. "This book is for educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Please consult a medical provider to determine the appropriateness of this information."
Then the book goes on to explain how most medical professionals are completely wrong and cannot be trusted on this subject.
-
I am amused by the disclaimer. "This book is for educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Please consult a medical provider to determine the appropriateness of this information."
Then the book goes on to explain how most medical professionals are completely wrong and cannot be trusted on this subject.
@horace I just started reading this one. I prefer Dr. Fung's take on things to the Fast Feast Repeat book written by the teacher/educator. The thing I dislike about this latest book is the heavy handed promotion of Mr. Moore's other books. That seems a trend in a few of these books - hawking other books, supplements, products, etc.
-
I haven't redd this book, but as there are a number of Le Carre fans here, I'm posting it because of what Kirkus Review said about it: “An absorbing, superbly written novel likely to stand as one of the best spy novels of the year”
-
I haven't redd this book, but as there are a number of Le Carre fans here, I'm posting it because of what Kirkus Review said about it: “An absorbing, superbly written novel likely to stand as one of the best spy novels of the year”
@catseye3 thanks for the heads-up. I love a good spy thriller.
I remember @bachophile recommending Red Sparrow, which I loved. However, the next couple of books in the series were not quite as good.
However, fiction is never as good as fact.
Want some real good spy stuff? Read Ben MacIntyre!
-
Cats I hope u enjoyed the Hail Mary project. I thought it was very cool sci if.
I can also recommended the bomber mafia, which I listened to as an audio book. For WW2 history buffs.
-
Thanks for the recco.
Perusing his book The Spy and the Traitor, here's the last line of the Amazon blurb: "Like the greatest novels of John le Carré, it brings readers deep into a world of treachery and betrayal, where the lines bleed between the personal and the professional, and one man's hatred of communism had the power to change the future of nations." !!!
Speaking of Le Carre, he wrote, "“The best true spy story I have ever read.” Whoa! Could you ask for a better cover blurb???
-
Thanks for the recco.
Perusing his book The Spy and the Traitor, here's the last line of the Amazon blurb: "Like the greatest novels of John le Carré, it brings readers deep into a world of treachery and betrayal, where the lines bleed between the personal and the professional, and one man's hatred of communism had the power to change the future of nations." !!!
Speaking of Le Carre, he wrote, "“The best true spy story I have ever read.” Whoa! Could you ask for a better cover blurb???
For the ultimate le carre experience, the Karla trilogy. I’ve read it a number of times.
-
Here I am again.
The exploits of the man in this book, Witold Pilecki, I redd about in some detail in another book. So gripping, I redd it twice. Tremendously heroic, a story of unbelievable courage.
Amazon: The incredible true story of a Polish resistance fighter’s infiltration of Auschwitz to sabotage the camp from within, and his death-defying attempt to warn the Allies about the Nazis’ plans for a “Final Solution” before it was too late.
To uncover the fate of the thousands being interred at a mysterious Nazi camp on the border of the Reich, a thirty-nine-year-old Polish resistance fighter named Witold Pilecki volunteered for an audacious mission: assume a fake identity, intentionally get captured and sent to the new camp, and then report back to the underground on what had happened to his compatriots there. But gathering information was not his only task: he was to execute an attack from inside—where the Germans would least expect it.
The name of the camp was Auschwitz.
Over the next two and half years, Pilecki forged an underground army within Auschwitz that sabotaged facilities, assassinated Nazi informants and officers, and gathered evidence of terrifying abuse and mass murder. But as he pieced together the horrifying truth that the camp was to become the epicenter of Nazi plans to exterminate Europe’s Jews, Pilecki realized he would have to risk his men, his life, and his family to warn the West before all was lost. To do so, meant attempting the impossible—an escape from Auschwitz itself.
2.557 ratings; average 4.5 stars
