What are you reading now?
-
@george-k said in What are you reading now?:
I LOVED Bonfire of The Vanities.
Me too! I heard a discussion of it recently that talked about how relevant it all still is decades later. Made me want to read it again. I’m pretty sure I’ve read it twice already.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
The best full body cycling workout is when you "plank":
Link to videoDoing it downhill is one thing, but the best plankers do it uphill.
@horace said in What are you reading now?:
The best full body cycling workout is when you "plank":
Link to videoDoing it downhill is one thing, but the best plankers do it uphill.
Carbon aero wheels on a fixie? Silly.
-
@george-k said in What are you reading now?:
I LOVED Bonfire of The Vanities.
Me too! I heard a discussion of it recently that talked about how relevant it all still is decades later. Made me want to read it again. I’m pretty sure I’ve read it twice already.
@jon-nyc said in What are you reading now?:
@george-k said in What are you reading now?:
I LOVED Bonfire of The Vanities.
Me too! I heard a discussion of it recently that talked about how relevant it all still is decades later. Made me want to read it again. I’m pretty sure I’ve read it twice already.
Sounds like the TNCR Book Club's choice for July is Bonfire of the Vanities.
-
Project Hail Mary.
Andy WeirIf you liked The Martian you should really like this.
Loving it. Great summer vacation read.
-
Project Hail Mary.
Andy WeirIf you liked The Martian you should really like this.
Loving it. Great summer vacation read.
@bachophile Thanks, Bach. I've not redd The Martian; it's been on my semi-enthused reading list . . . the Look Inside looks great for this one. Love his lively style.
20,038 ratings, 4.5 average stars.
-
Finished
Kind of uneven - plot is good, detail that is interspersed is good, but I thought the lead character was particularly not credible - but it was an engaging morality play.
-
-
Are there any dirty bits?
@doctor-phibes said in What are you reading now?:
Are there any dirty bits?
You mean, "Does it have the 'Right Stuff'?"
-
@doctor-phibes said in What are you reading now?:
Are there any dirty bits?
You mean, "Does it have the 'Right Stuff'?"
@george-k said in What are you reading now?:
@doctor-phibes said in What are you reading now?:
Are there any dirty bits?
You mean, "Does it have the 'Right Stuff'?"
For Phibes, I think he's referencing the Right Stiff.
-
Let me know what you think about that Ken. I respected his writing during the Iraq war years ago.
@jon-nyc I just finished it. I heard Packer discussing this book on a podcast which is why I thought about reading this book.
He divides the country into 4 major categories Smart America (the meritocracy), Just America (social justice youth), Free America (libertarian types) and Real America (traditionalists - ala Sarah Palin). He does a decent analysis of how these groups developed - goes back prior to the Civil War.
One of his major premises for why we are where we are is that the happy days of post WWII where we were the shining city on the hill with economic opportunity for all is not quite as true in the front half of the twenty-first century.
He talks about the the politicization of Covid, not pleased with what DJT did with that and goes into some detail.
He does also has some brief bios of Frances Perkins, Andrew Greeley, and A Philip Randolph.
There's a lot of territory covered. He's a leftist but with plenty of abuse of wokeness and idiocy for the Smart America group. If you like Sam Harris, this would be on the same shelf. I think this is easily as good as his last book.
-
@jon-nyc I just finished it. I heard Packer discussing this book on a podcast which is why I thought about reading this book.
He divides the country into 4 major categories Smart America (the meritocracy), Just America (social justice youth), Free America (libertarian types) and Real America (traditionalists - ala Sarah Palin). He does a decent analysis of how these groups developed - goes back prior to the Civil War.
One of his major premises for why we are where we are is that the happy days of post WWII where we were the shining city on the hill with economic opportunity for all is not quite as true in the front half of the twenty-first century.
He talks about the the politicization of Covid, not pleased with what DJT did with that and goes into some detail.
He does also has some brief bios of Frances Perkins, Andrew Greeley, and A Philip Randolph.
There's a lot of territory covered. He's a leftist but with plenty of abuse of wokeness and idiocy for the Smart America group. If you like Sam Harris, this would be on the same shelf. I think this is easily as good as his last book.
-
@kluurs said in What are you reading now?:
I couldn't abide this one. She writes as if she assumes her readers are imbeciles. Or maybe 10 years old.
.
.
.
.
This one I loved. Also it has better practical knowledge. It's interesting that the "scientific consensus", and in particular the officially supported one from the governmental authorities, is still so wrong about weight loss. (Says a lot about "scientific consensus" in general.) There shouldn't be any reasonable doubt anymore that low carb diets are the best general approach. I was amused how Taubes, near the end of the book, gave a middle finger to diet books in general when he begrudgingly gave some simple diet advice: tape up on your refrigerator a one-page dietary outline given in a 1951 endocrinology textbook. It basically says to avoid carbs.
-
@kluurs said in What are you reading now?:
I couldn't abide this one. She writes as if she assumes her readers are imbeciles. Or maybe 10 years old.
.
.
.
.This one I loved. Also it has better practical knowledge. It's interesting that the "scientific consensus", and in particular the officially supported one from the governmental authorities, is still so wrong about weight loss. (Says a lot about "scientific consensus" in general.) There shouldn't be any reasonable doubt anymore that low carb diets are the best general approach. I was amused how Taubes, near the end of the book, gave a middle finger to diet books in general when he begrudgingly gave some simple diet advice: tape up on your refrigerator a one-page dietary outline given in a 1951 endocrinology textbook. It basically says to avoid carbs.
-
I am amused by the disclaimer. "This book is for educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Please consult a medical provider to determine the appropriateness of this information."
Then the book goes on to explain how most medical professionals are completely wrong and cannot be trusted on this subject.
