NYC serological study
-
Estimate was 21% infected. Cuomo presented numbers yesterday.
That would suggest an IFR of almost 1%.
Might be a high estimate, I've heard noises that there could be selection bias in their sampling, not as bad as the guys at Stanford, but bias all the same.
-
Seems a bit low to me. Less densely populated areas are coming up with 15%, I would expect NYC to be at 25%-30%.
And I am a trained Epdi--Epidime-Epidiwhatsit.
The Brad
-
Seems a bit low to me. Less densely populated areas are coming up with 15%, I would expect NYC to be at 25%-30%.
And I am a trained Epdi--Epidime-Epidiwhatsit.
@LuFins-Dad said in NYC serological study:
Seems a bit low to me. Less densely populated areas are coming up with 15%, I would expect NYC to be at 25%-30%.
And I am a trained Epdi--Epidime-Epidiwhatsit.
What? The only places coming up that high are tiny towns that had big outbreaks. The German town of 12k, Chelsea with 40k
