NYC serological study
-
Estimate was 21% infected. Cuomo presented numbers yesterday.
That would suggest an IFR of almost 1%.
Might be a high estimate, I've heard noises that there could be selection bias in their sampling, not as bad as the guys at Stanford, but bias all the same.
-
Seems a bit low to me. Less densely populated areas are coming up with 15%, I would expect NYC to be at 25%-30%.
And I am a trained Epdi--Epidime-Epidiwhatsit.
The Brad
-
Seems a bit low to me. Less densely populated areas are coming up with 15%, I would expect NYC to be at 25%-30%.
And I am a trained Epdi--Epidime-Epidiwhatsit.
@LuFins-Dad said in NYC serological study:
Seems a bit low to me. Less densely populated areas are coming up with 15%, I would expect NYC to be at 25%-30%.
And I am a trained Epdi--Epidime-Epidiwhatsit.
What? The only places coming up that high are tiny towns that had big outbreaks. The German town of 12k, Chelsea with 40k
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login