Constitutional Carry
-
-
Yes and no
Yes, because of course you should be able to do that
No, because it gives you the idea that something like this new law should be necessary
@copper I know this is probably apple/orange comparison, but I will ask just to make the conversation
If I understand correctly
Carry a gun - no permit, no ID, etc needed to do so
Should not the same right go with voting?
Why or why not?
-
@copper I know this is probably apple/orange comparison, but I will ask just to make the conversation
If I understand correctly
Carry a gun - no permit, no ID, etc needed to do so
Should not the same right go with voting?
Why or why not?
-
@jolly Do you think it is a good idea?
@taiwan_girl said in Constitutional Carry:
@jolly Do you think it is a good idea?
Don't have any problem with it. The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed, and all that. The only reason that a law-abiding citizen should not carry a gun, is if A) he doesn't want to, or B) He is precluded by law from doing so (convicted felon, mental patient, etc.)
The only place I see compromise, if our representatives agree that in order to buy a gun, you must show proof of a safety and legal ramifications class. I don't have a problem with that.
-
-
@taiwan_girl said in Constitutional Carry:
Federal judge rules Oregon’s tough new gun law is constitutional
Big whoop. Consider the judge, consider the law. It will be overturned by SCOTUS, at least parts of it. They may get to keep the background check and training components.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Constitutional Carry:
Federal judge rules Oregon’s tough new gun law is constitutional
Big whoop. Consider the judge, consider the law. It will be overturned by SCOTUS, at least parts of it. They may get to keep the background check and training components.
@Jolly said in Constitutional Carry:
@taiwan_girl said in Constitutional Carry:
Federal judge rules Oregon’s tough new gun law is constitutional
Big whoop. Consider the judge, consider the state, consider the law. It will be overturned by SCOTUS, at least parts of it. They may get to keep the background check and training components.
