Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. That's a nice court you have there...

That's a nice court you have there...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
4 Posts 4 Posters 51 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 12:53 last edited by
    #1

    https://bearingarms.com/patrick-richardson/2021/03/07/court-packing-2a-cases-n41775

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • M Away
      M Away
      Mik
      wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 14:26 last edited by
      #2

      It's all about 2022, and I don't think they can get it done by then.

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      1 Reply Last reply
      • J Online
        J Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 14:36 last edited by
        #3

        Finally someone besides me gets the value of strategic ambiguity.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • T Online
          T Online
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 17:38 last edited by
          #4

          I think this article is incorrect for a couple of reasons:

          I think it is "empty talk" about adding judges to the Supreme Court of the US. From what I have hear and read, there would not be enough interest from either side to do this. It is a (somewhat) small group of Democrats that want to do this.

          The article says:
          "And the Roberts court has been remarkably resistant to taking up significant 2A cases since McDonald."

          When I looked up that case, it was decide in 2010!! So, to say or suggest that not doing gun cases is because of President Biden and his threat to add judges makes no sense.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes

          2/4

          8 Mar 2021, 14:26


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          2 out of 4
          • First post
            2/4
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups