The Statement

[LuFins Dad]

Sorry, but I do not have any sympathy. She was illegally breaking into the Capitol for unknown purposes.

[George K]

Are there guidelines, rules, requirements for the use of deadly force by the Capitol Police?

[Aqua Letifer]

For some reason, the name of the office who shot her

Ouch.

[George K]

@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:

For some reason, the name of the office who shot her

Ouch.

That's been talked about here for a while. @jon-nyc pointed out that other people shot by the Secret Service have not had the names of the shooter revealed.

I simply want to know what the protocol/guidelines are. Presumably there's a departmental policy regarding that.

[George K]

Here is the Chicago Police Dept policy on the use of deadly force:

[jon-nyc]

This wasn’t a traffic stop. The officer was protecting Congress from a violent mob.

He did the Lord’s work stopping that mob. The family should invite the officer to the funeral and give him an apology and a hug.

[Loki]

It was not a spontaneous riot for several of the mob. Also for the police officers it must have been very real. It’s not just physical property they are protecting. Could you imagine yourself as an officer in real time evaluating the situation and having no command structure providing orders?

[Aqua Letifer]

@george-k said in The Statement:

@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:

For some reason, the name of the office who shot her

Ouch.

That's been talked about here for a while. @jon-nyc pointed out that other people shot by the Secret Service have not had the names of the shooter revealed.

I simply want to know what the protocol/guidelines are. Presumably there's a departmental policy regarding that.

I was just pointing out the glaring grammar error.

[Jolly]

@jon-nyc said in The Statement:

This wasn’t a traffic stop. The officer was protecting Congress from a violent mob.

He did the Lord’s work stopping that mob. The family should invite the officer to the funeral and give him an apology and a hug.

Then why didn't the other officers standing almost next to her, shoot her?

[jon-nyc]

Seems like an unrelated question but you’d have to ask them. Other cops that were standing among the invaders are on record saying they were afraid of being outgunned if they used their weapons, since the were overwhelm3d numerically.

The hero that stopped the mob was behind a barricade, along with the people it was his duty to protect.

[Renauda]

@lufins-dad said in The Statement:

Sorry, but I do not have any sympathy. She was illegally breaking into the Capitol for unknown purposes.

That is my feeling as well. Just what was her purpose of being there? Surely she knew it was unlawful.

[taiwan_girl]

@renauda said in The Statement:

@lufins-dad said in The Statement:

Sorry, but I do not have any sympathy. She was illegally breaking into the Capitol for unknown purposes.

That is my feeling as well. Just what was her purpose of being there? Surely she knew it was unlawful.

I agree.

[Copper]

If it was unlawful to be in the Capitol, it shouldn't have been.

If there is one building where a citizen should be able to enter, it is that one.

[Renauda]

Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.

[Jolly]

@renauda said in The Statement:

Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.

Worth killing her for it?

[Aqua Letifer]

@jolly said in The Statement:

@renauda said in The Statement:

Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.

Worth killing her for it?

Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.

[Jolly]

@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:

@jolly said in The Statement:

@renauda said in The Statement:

Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.

Worth killing her for it?

Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.

As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...

[Aqua Letifer]

@jolly said in The Statement:

@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:

@jolly said in The Statement:

@renauda said in The Statement:

Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.

Worth killing her for it?

Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.

As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...

Fine by me.

[Rainman]

@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:

@jolly said in The Statement:

@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:

@jolly said in The Statement:

@renauda said in The Statement:

Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.

Worth killing her for it?

Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.

As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...

Fine by me.

Nooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!

[Renauda]

@jolly said in The Statement:

@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:

@jolly said in The Statement:

@renauda said in The Statement:

Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.

Worth killing her for it?

Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.

As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...

Absolutely not. The Portland rabble deserves nothing less than a whiff or two of grapeshot.