The Statement
-
Sorry, but I do not have any sympathy. She was illegally breaking into the Capitol for unknown purposes.
@lufins-dad said in The Statement:
Sorry, but I do not have any sympathy. She was illegally breaking into the Capitol for unknown purposes.
That is my feeling as well. Just what was her purpose of being there? Surely she knew it was unlawful.
-
@lufins-dad said in The Statement:
Sorry, but I do not have any sympathy. She was illegally breaking into the Capitol for unknown purposes.
That is my feeling as well. Just what was her purpose of being there? Surely she knew it was unlawful.
@renauda said in The Statement:
@lufins-dad said in The Statement:
Sorry, but I do not have any sympathy. She was illegally breaking into the Capitol for unknown purposes.
That is my feeling as well. Just what was her purpose of being there? Surely she knew it was unlawful.
I agree.
-
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
-
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
@jolly said in The Statement:
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.
-
@jolly said in The Statement:
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.
@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:
@jolly said in The Statement:
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.
As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:
@jolly said in The Statement:
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.
As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...
@jolly said in The Statement:
@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:
@jolly said in The Statement:
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.
As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...
Fine by me.
-
@jolly said in The Statement:
@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:
@jolly said in The Statement:
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.
As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...
Fine by me.
@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:
@jolly said in The Statement:
@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:
@jolly said in The Statement:
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.
As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...
Fine by me.
Nooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!
-
@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:
@jolly said in The Statement:
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.
As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...
@jolly said in The Statement:
@aqua-letifer said in The Statement:
@jolly said in The Statement:
@renauda said in The Statement:
Being in the Capitol is not at question, being present in the Capitol as an active participant in mob violence on 6 January as Ms Babbitt was, is unlawful and therefore very much in question.
Worth killing her for it?
Hell yeah. Choot 'er twice.
As long as we apply the same standard in Portland...
Absolutely not. The Portland rabble deserves nothing less than a whiff or two of grapeshot.
-
Pelosi Galore wants crew-served weapons. At least in Washington.
Ain't nuthin' like a Ma Deuce chugging along...That 750 grain bullet will make a red mist out of whoever it touches, along with five or six critters behind the target.
You'll be able to go out afterwards and pick up pieces of arms, legs, and skull fragments. Nothing says power, like human offal in the streets.
By God, that'll show 'em!
