Fraud

[Jolly]

Yeah it's WND , but the statements are interesting...

https://www.wnd.com/2021/03/texas-ag-can-tell-lots-election-fraud/

[Doctor Phibes]

You notice the claims have got a lot less specific since people started getting sued for defamation?

The inference that all the fraud is one-way is laughable.

[Jolly]

@doctor-phibes said in Fraud:

You notice the claims have got a lot less specific since people started getting sued for defamation?

The inference that all the fraud is one-way is laughable.

Was that what the man said?

[Axtremus]

@Jolly what do you think the man said, and which parts of what he said do you agree with?

[Doctor Phibes]

@jolly said in Fraud:

@doctor-phibes said in Fraud:

You notice the claims have got a lot less specific since people started getting sued for defamation?

The inference that all the fraud is one-way is laughable.

Was that what the man said?

No, but it was clearly inferred.

[Jolly]

@doctor-phibes said in Fraud:

@jolly said in Fraud:

@doctor-phibes said in Fraud:

You notice the claims have got a lot less specific since people started getting sued for defamation?

The inference that all the fraud is one-way is laughable.

Was that what the man said?

No, but it was clearly inferred.

You have given in to your own biases.

[taiwan_girl]

So, if fraud is on both sides, dont they kind of cancel each other out and the end result is if there was not fraud at all?

:man-shrugging:

[Jolly]

@taiwan_girl said in Fraud:

So, if fraud is on both sides, dont they kind of cancel each other out and the end result is if there was not fraud at all?

:man-shrugging:

How much fraud is there on both sides?

I want you to point that out to me. The logic tree goes like this:

1. Is there fraud?
2. If so, how much?
3. Where dies it primarily occur?
4. Who benefits the most?
5. How do we eliminate fraud?

[taiwan_girl]

@jolly said in Fraud:

@taiwan_girl said in Fraud:

So, if fraud is on both sides, dont they kind of cancel each other out and the end result is if there was not fraud at all?

:man-shrugging:

How much fraud is there on both sides?

I want you to point that out to me. The logic tree goes like this:

1. Is there fraud?
2. If so, how much?
3. Where dies it primarily occur?
4. Who benefits the most?
5. How do we eliminate fraud?

I dont know that answer, but human nature being human nature, the logic answer would be that both sides commit it equally. LOL

I agree that there is some fraud that occurs, but my opinion is that it is a super small amount and the "net" result for one side or the other is almost zero.

I do agree that there should be no fraud however.

[Jolly]

@taiwan_girl said in Fraud:

@jolly said in Fraud:

@taiwan_girl said in Fraud:

So, if fraud is on both sides, dont they kind of cancel each other out and the end result is if there was not fraud at all?

:man-shrugging:

How much fraud is there on both sides?

I want you to point that out to me. The logic tree goes like this:

1. Is there fraud?
2. If so, how much?
3. Where dies it primarily occur?
4. Who benefits the most?
5. How do we eliminate fraud?

I dont know that answer, but human nature being human nature, the logic answer would be that both sides commit it equally. LOL

I agree that there is some fraud that occurs, but my opinion is that it is a super small amount and the "net" result for one side or the other is almost zero.

I do agree that there should be no fraud however.

In other words, you don't have a single damn idea, LOL.