Fraud
-
Yeah it's WND , but the statements are interesting...
https://www.wnd.com/2021/03/texas-ag-can-tell-lots-election-fraud/
-
You notice the claims have got a lot less specific since people started getting sued for defamation?
The inference that all the fraud is one-way is laughable.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Fraud:
You notice the claims have got a lot less specific since people started getting sued for defamation?
The inference that all the fraud is one-way is laughable.
Was that what the man said?
-
@doctor-phibes said in Fraud:
You notice the claims have got a lot less specific since people started getting sued for defamation?
The inference that all the fraud is one-way is laughable.
Was that what the man said?
No, but it was clearly inferred.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Fraud:
@doctor-phibes said in Fraud:
You notice the claims have got a lot less specific since people started getting sued for defamation?
The inference that all the fraud is one-way is laughable.
Was that what the man said?
No, but it was clearly inferred.
You have given in to your own biases.
-
So, if fraud is on both sides, dont they kind of cancel each other out and the end result is if there was not fraud at all?
-
@taiwan_girl said in Fraud:
So, if fraud is on both sides, dont they kind of cancel each other out and the end result is if there was not fraud at all?
How much fraud is there on both sides?
I want you to point that out to me. The logic tree goes like this:
- Is there fraud?
- If so, how much?
- Where dies it primarily occur?
- Who benefits the most?
- How do we eliminate fraud?
-
@taiwan_girl said in Fraud:
So, if fraud is on both sides, dont they kind of cancel each other out and the end result is if there was not fraud at all?
How much fraud is there on both sides?
I want you to point that out to me. The logic tree goes like this:
- Is there fraud?
- If so, how much?
- Where dies it primarily occur?
- Who benefits the most?
- How do we eliminate fraud?
I dont know that answer, but human nature being human nature, the logic answer would be that both sides commit it equally. LOL
I agree that there is some fraud that occurs, but my opinion is that it is a super small amount and the "net" result for one side or the other is almost zero.
I do agree that there should be no fraud however.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Fraud:
@taiwan_girl said in Fraud:
So, if fraud is on both sides, dont they kind of cancel each other out and the end result is if there was not fraud at all?
How much fraud is there on both sides?
I want you to point that out to me. The logic tree goes like this:
- Is there fraud?
- If so, how much?
- Where dies it primarily occur?
- Who benefits the most?
- How do we eliminate fraud?
I dont know that answer, but human nature being human nature, the logic answer would be that both sides commit it equally. LOL
I agree that there is some fraud that occurs, but my opinion is that it is a super small amount and the "net" result for one side or the other is almost zero.
I do agree that there should be no fraud however.
In other words, you don't have a single damn idea, LOL.