Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. 25,000

25,000

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
24 Posts 7 Posters 264 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    And something else to consider...

    https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Jolly

      And something else to consider...

      https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      @jolly said in 25,000:

      And something else to consider...

      https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

      Absolutely 100% agree. I have mentioned countries in Asia that have been "successful" with COVID and one of the common things that they did (in addition to things like contact trace, masks, etc) is making the "bubble" around the whole country.

      But, something like that is not able to sustain long term, especially when using it for immigration. I think long term, better (and cheaper) to make the people not want to leave their home country.

      Building a border wall = band aid. Doesn't cure and only temporary

      Making people want to stay in their country = vaccine LOL

      JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

        @jolly said in 25,000:

        And something else to consider...

        https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

        Absolutely 100% agree. I have mentioned countries in Asia that have been "successful" with COVID and one of the common things that they did (in addition to things like contact trace, masks, etc) is making the "bubble" around the whole country.

        But, something like that is not able to sustain long term, especially when using it for immigration. I think long term, better (and cheaper) to make the people not want to leave their home country.

        Building a border wall = band aid. Doesn't cure and only temporary

        Making people want to stay in their country = vaccine LOL

        JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

        @jolly said in 25,000:

        And something else to consider...

        https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

        Absolutely 100% agree. I have mentioned countries in Asia that have been "successful" with COVID and one of the common things that they did (in addition to things like contact trace, masks, etc) is making the "bubble" around the whole country.

        But, something like that is not able to sustain long term, especially when using it for immigration. I think long term, better (and cheaper) to make the people not want to leave their home country.

        Building a border wall = band aid. Doesn't cure and only temporary

        Making people want to stay in their country = vaccine LOL

        Do you have any idea how much blood and treasure the American people have spent "trying to make other people's lives better"?

        I'm not saying our foreign policy has always been altruistic. We are a great nation with our own interests. But we have stuck our necks out on more than one occasion.

        Sometimes, it works. Most if the time, it doesn't. People have to fix themselves, if they wish to see real and lasting change. To just say, "let's make people not want to leave their own country" is mostly unworkable and reeks of naivety.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Jolly

          @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

          @jolly said in 25,000:

          And something else to consider...

          https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

          Absolutely 100% agree. I have mentioned countries in Asia that have been "successful" with COVID and one of the common things that they did (in addition to things like contact trace, masks, etc) is making the "bubble" around the whole country.

          But, something like that is not able to sustain long term, especially when using it for immigration. I think long term, better (and cheaper) to make the people not want to leave their home country.

          Building a border wall = band aid. Doesn't cure and only temporary

          Making people want to stay in their country = vaccine LOL

          Do you have any idea how much blood and treasure the American people have spent "trying to make other people's lives better"?

          I'm not saying our foreign policy has always been altruistic. We are a great nation with our own interests. But we have stuck our necks out on more than one occasion.

          Sometimes, it works. Most if the time, it doesn't. People have to fix themselves, if they wish to see real and lasting change. To just say, "let's make people not want to leave their own country" is mostly unworkable and reeks of naivety.

          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          @jolly said in 25,000:

          @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

          @jolly said in 25,000:

          And something else to consider...

          https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

          Absolutely 100% agree. I have mentioned countries in Asia that have been "successful" with COVID and one of the common things that they did (in addition to things like contact trace, masks, etc) is making the "bubble" around the whole country.

          But, something like that is not able to sustain long term, especially when using it for immigration. I think long term, better (and cheaper) to make the people not want to leave their home country.

          Building a border wall = band aid. Doesn't cure and only temporary

          Making people want to stay in their country = vaccine LOL

          Do you have any idea how much blood and treasure the American people have spent "trying to make other people's lives better"?

          I'm not saying our foreign policy has always been altruistic. We are a great nation with our own interests. But we have stuck our necks out on more than one occasion.

          Sometimes, it works. Most if the time, it doesn't. People have to fix themselves, if they wish to see real and lasting change. To just say, "let's make people not want to leave their own country" is mostly unworkable and reeks of naivety.

          I agree that the US has done more for other countries than any other country in the world. No doubt about that.

          And I do believe that the efforts the US has made, do often work more than they dont.

          But you are right, the people there in other countries have to have responsibility for the change also. It cannot be, and never should be, the US coming and saying, "Do this. Doesn't matter what YOU want. We know what we want you to do." That is a receipt for failure.

          OVerall, people are pretty good. And in my experience in different countries, people who illegal immigrate do not do it as their first choice. IF there were a choice:

          A. opportunity to improve their life in their home country
          B. illegal immigrate to a strange country, different language, etc.

          The high majority of people will choose A

          1 Reply Last reply
          • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

            @jolly said in 25,000:

            As long as economic disparity exists at the level it does, and the enforcement of our border and our laws are lax, you will NEVER stop them from coming. You won't even slow them down.

            I mostly agree, and it seems like you agree with my point that stopping them at the border is not a good protocol. You will never stop them from coming.

            My idea is to decrease the economic disparity. Building a border wall does nothing to help that,

            CopperC Offline
            CopperC Offline
            Copper
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

            My idea is to decrease the economic disparity.

            The problem with that is that the democrat strategy to reduce disparity will be to hurt the US economy. This is easier than helping the south-of-the-border economy.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

              @jolly said in 25,000:

              @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

              @jolly said in 25,000:

              And something else to consider...

              https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

              Absolutely 100% agree. I have mentioned countries in Asia that have been "successful" with COVID and one of the common things that they did (in addition to things like contact trace, masks, etc) is making the "bubble" around the whole country.

              But, something like that is not able to sustain long term, especially when using it for immigration. I think long term, better (and cheaper) to make the people not want to leave their home country.

              Building a border wall = band aid. Doesn't cure and only temporary

              Making people want to stay in their country = vaccine LOL

              Do you have any idea how much blood and treasure the American people have spent "trying to make other people's lives better"?

              I'm not saying our foreign policy has always been altruistic. We are a great nation with our own interests. But we have stuck our necks out on more than one occasion.

              Sometimes, it works. Most if the time, it doesn't. People have to fix themselves, if they wish to see real and lasting change. To just say, "let's make people not want to leave their own country" is mostly unworkable and reeks of naivety.

              I agree that the US has done more for other countries than any other country in the world. No doubt about that.

              And I do believe that the efforts the US has made, do often work more than they dont.

              But you are right, the people there in other countries have to have responsibility for the change also. It cannot be, and never should be, the US coming and saying, "Do this. Doesn't matter what YOU want. We know what we want you to do." That is a receipt for failure.

              OVerall, people are pretty good. And in my experience in different countries, people who illegal immigrate do not do it as their first choice. IF there were a choice:

              A. opportunity to improve their life in their home country
              B. illegal immigrate to a strange country, different language, etc.

              The high majority of people will choose A

              Often these countries are in the condition they are in because of poor leadership. Either corruption or incompetence and often both. The US giving money to these nations just winds up feeding the corrupt or being used incompetently. I’m reminded of the German “super rabbits” given to North Korea as part of a breeding program. The North Korean officers had a banquet to celebrate and ate all the rabbits.

              Giving money to many of these countries is oftentimes just making things worse.

              The Brad

              AxtremusA taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

                @jolly said in 25,000:

                @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

                @jolly said in 25,000:

                And something else to consider...

                https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

                Absolutely 100% agree. I have mentioned countries in Asia that have been "successful" with COVID and one of the common things that they did (in addition to things like contact trace, masks, etc) is making the "bubble" around the whole country.

                But, something like that is not able to sustain long term, especially when using it for immigration. I think long term, better (and cheaper) to make the people not want to leave their home country.

                Building a border wall = band aid. Doesn't cure and only temporary

                Making people want to stay in their country = vaccine LOL

                Do you have any idea how much blood and treasure the American people have spent "trying to make other people's lives better"?

                I'm not saying our foreign policy has always been altruistic. We are a great nation with our own interests. But we have stuck our necks out on more than one occasion.

                Sometimes, it works. Most if the time, it doesn't. People have to fix themselves, if they wish to see real and lasting change. To just say, "let's make people not want to leave their own country" is mostly unworkable and reeks of naivety.

                I agree that the US has done more for other countries than any other country in the world. No doubt about that.

                And I do believe that the efforts the US has made, do often work more than they dont.

                But you are right, the people there in other countries have to have responsibility for the change also. It cannot be, and never should be, the US coming and saying, "Do this. Doesn't matter what YOU want. We know what we want you to do." That is a receipt for failure.

                OVerall, people are pretty good. And in my experience in different countries, people who illegal immigrate do not do it as their first choice. IF there were a choice:

                A. opportunity to improve their life in their home country
                B. illegal immigrate to a strange country, different language, etc.

                The high majority of people will choose A

                Often these countries are in the condition they are in because of poor leadership. Either corruption or incompetence and often both. The US giving money to these nations just winds up feeding the corrupt or being used incompetently. I’m reminded of the German “super rabbits” given to North Korea as part of a breeding program. The North Korean officers had a banquet to celebrate and ate all the rabbits.

                Giving money to many of these countries is oftentimes just making things worse.

                AxtremusA Offline
                AxtremusA Offline
                Axtremus
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                @lufins-dad said in 25,000:

                Often these countries are in the condition they are in because of poor leadership. Either corruption or incompetence and often both. The US giving money to these nations just winds up feeding the corrupt or being used incompetently. I’m reminded of the German “super rabbits” given to North Korea as part of a breeding program. The North Korean officers had a banquet to celebrate and ate all the rabbits.

                Champion human rights and promote democracy. Do not lend support to despots and autocrats. Resist the temptation to support "our dictators" just for geopolitical expedience. That way you move the world towards the direction of electing good leaders.

                JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • AxtremusA Axtremus

                  @lufins-dad said in 25,000:

                  Often these countries are in the condition they are in because of poor leadership. Either corruption or incompetence and often both. The US giving money to these nations just winds up feeding the corrupt or being used incompetently. I’m reminded of the German “super rabbits” given to North Korea as part of a breeding program. The North Korean officers had a banquet to celebrate and ate all the rabbits.

                  Champion human rights and promote democracy. Do not lend support to despots and autocrats. Resist the temptation to support "our dictators" just for geopolitical expedience. That way you move the world towards the direction of electing good leaders.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  @axtremus said in 25,000:

                  @lufins-dad said in 25,000:

                  Often these countries are in the condition they are in because of poor leadership. Either corruption or incompetence and often both. The US giving money to these nations just winds up feeding the corrupt or being used incompetently. I’m reminded of the German “super rabbits” given to North Korea as part of a breeding program. The North Korean officers had a banquet to celebrate and ate all the rabbits.

                  Champion human rights and promote democracy. Do not lend support to despots and autocrats. Resist the temptation to support "our dictators" just for geopolitical expedience. That way you move the world towards the direction of electing good leaders.

                  God Bless you...

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    @axtremus said in 25,000:

                    @lufins-dad said in 25,000:

                    Often these countries are in the condition they are in because of poor leadership. Either corruption or incompetence and often both. The US giving money to these nations just winds up feeding the corrupt or being used incompetently. I’m reminded of the German “super rabbits” given to North Korea as part of a breeding program. The North Korean officers had a banquet to celebrate and ate all the rabbits.

                    Champion human rights and promote democracy. Do not lend support to despots and autocrats. Resist the temptation to support "our dictators" just for geopolitical expedience. That way you move the world towards the direction of electing good leaders.

                    God Bless you...

                    AxtremusA Offline
                    AxtremusA Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    @jolly said in 25,000:

                    @axtremus said in 25,000:

                    Champion human rights and promote democracy. Do not lend support to despots and autocrats. Resist the temptation to support "our dictators" just for geopolitical expedience. That way you move the world towards the direction of electing good leaders.

                    God Bless you...

                    Thank you for your kind sentiment.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                      @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

                      @jolly said in 25,000:

                      @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

                      @jolly said in 25,000:

                      And something else to consider...

                      https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

                      Absolutely 100% agree. I have mentioned countries in Asia that have been "successful" with COVID and one of the common things that they did (in addition to things like contact trace, masks, etc) is making the "bubble" around the whole country.

                      But, something like that is not able to sustain long term, especially when using it for immigration. I think long term, better (and cheaper) to make the people not want to leave their home country.

                      Building a border wall = band aid. Doesn't cure and only temporary

                      Making people want to stay in their country = vaccine LOL

                      Do you have any idea how much blood and treasure the American people have spent "trying to make other people's lives better"?

                      I'm not saying our foreign policy has always been altruistic. We are a great nation with our own interests. But we have stuck our necks out on more than one occasion.

                      Sometimes, it works. Most if the time, it doesn't. People have to fix themselves, if they wish to see real and lasting change. To just say, "let's make people not want to leave their own country" is mostly unworkable and reeks of naivety.

                      I agree that the US has done more for other countries than any other country in the world. No doubt about that.

                      And I do believe that the efforts the US has made, do often work more than they dont.

                      But you are right, the people there in other countries have to have responsibility for the change also. It cannot be, and never should be, the US coming and saying, "Do this. Doesn't matter what YOU want. We know what we want you to do." That is a receipt for failure.

                      OVerall, people are pretty good. And in my experience in different countries, people who illegal immigrate do not do it as their first choice. IF there were a choice:

                      A. opportunity to improve their life in their home country
                      B. illegal immigrate to a strange country, different language, etc.

                      The high majority of people will choose A

                      Often these countries are in the condition they are in because of poor leadership. Either corruption or incompetence and often both. The US giving money to these nations just winds up feeding the corrupt or being used incompetently. I’m reminded of the German “super rabbits” given to North Korea as part of a breeding program. The North Korean officers had a banquet to celebrate and ate all the rabbits.

                      Giving money to many of these countries is oftentimes just making things worse.

                      taiwan_girlT Offline
                      taiwan_girlT Offline
                      taiwan_girl
                      wrote on last edited by taiwan_girl
                      #24

                      @lufins-dad said in 25,000:

                      @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

                      @jolly said in 25,000:

                      @taiwan_girl said in 25,000:

                      @jolly said in 25,000:

                      And something else to consider...

                      https://quillette.com/2021/02/15/do-lockdowns-work-only-if-you-lock-the-borders-down-too/

                      Absolutely 100% agree. I have mentioned countries in Asia that have been "successful" with COVID and one of the common things that they did (in addition to things like contact trace, masks, etc) is making the "bubble" around the whole country.

                      But, something like that is not able to sustain long term, especially when using it for immigration. I think long term, better (and cheaper) to make the people not want to leave their home country.

                      Building a border wall = band aid. Doesn't cure and only temporary

                      Making people want to stay in their country = vaccine LOL

                      Do you have any idea how much blood and treasure the American people have spent "trying to make other people's lives better"?

                      I'm not saying our foreign policy has always been altruistic. We are a great nation with our own interests. But we have stuck our necks out on more than one occasion.

                      Sometimes, it works. Most if the time, it doesn't. People have to fix themselves, if they wish to see real and lasting change. To just say, "let's make people not want to leave their own country" is mostly unworkable and reeks of naivety.

                      I agree that the US has done more for other countries than any other country in the world. No doubt about that.

                      And I do believe that the efforts the US has made, do often work more than they dont.

                      But you are right, the people there in other countries have to have responsibility for the change also. It cannot be, and never should be, the US coming and saying, "Do this. Doesn't matter what YOU want. We know what we want you to do." That is a receipt for failure.

                      OVerall, people are pretty good. And in my experience in different countries, people who illegal immigrate do not do it as their first choice. IF there were a choice:

                      A. opportunity to improve their life in their home country
                      B. illegal immigrate to a strange country, different language, etc.

                      The high majority of people will choose A

                      Often these countries are in the condition they are in because of poor leadership. Either corruption or incompetence and often both. The US giving money to these nations just winds up feeding the corrupt or being used incompetently. I’m reminded of the German “super rabbits” given to North Korea as part of a breeding program. The North Korean officers had a banquet to celebrate and ate all the rabbits.

                      Giving money to many of these countries is oftentimes just making things worse.

                      Agree with the first part for sure. You (general you) however cannot just walk away.

                      Moving to a more isolation policy will result in:

                      • giving power to others in the world (for example China)
                      • basically saying that our country will not be a superpower anymore in 100 years.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups