The Twitter Fascination
-
@jolly said in The Twitter Fascination:
He made a mistake. Too many nuts in the crowd and he lit the fuse on them.
As they say in motor racing, the most important nut is the one behind the wheel.
-
@89th said in The Twitter Fascination:
@jolly said in The Twitter Fascination:
I don't think it's a power grab. I think Trump honestly believes he was cheated. I think he wanted to use every legal and political means to correct the perceived fraud. His rally in Washington was the last in a series of efforts to try to apply maximum political pressure and try to effect the certification process.
He made a mistake. Too many nuts in the crowd and he lit the fuse on them.
And let's be fair...Compare and contrast these people and the Antifa protesters that have been rioting across the country for months. What are the goals of the protesters? What private property has been damaged? What public property has been damaged? Who has been injured or killed?
In the case of both classes if protesters, what are the fundamental origins of their existence?
How Trump thinks he was cheated is mind boggling. Gore lost the election (via Florida) by 500 votes and the recount was stopped. That was wayyyyy closer (like 1,000,000x) to a stolen election than anything Trump has made up. He lost by millions and millions of votes, a landslide of states.
To be clear, I agree with you about antifa, they are much much much worse and more violent group. I was surprised and glad not to have seen much in graffiti or distraction at the Capitol overall, and honestly, half the people in the chambers looked surprised to even be there.
I agree with you and @Doctor-Phibes
If this was really about election integrity, why was President Trump not investigating Florida? Ohio? Texas? Etc. Maybe President elect Biden won those states?????
Is there some fraud? Yes! Does it occur on both sides? Yes!
Is there some sort of giant conspiracy the involves hundreds (thousands?) of people, everyone from unpaid volunteers to Republican state officials to US Supreme Court judges to who knows who else? Bawaaaah!!!!!
BOTH sides are not 100% clean in an election, but nowhere near the amount some people say.
Great example is the recent President Trump call with Georgia officials
Trump: there is defiantly something wrong with the voting machines. they’re obviously corrupt and in favor of Biden.
Georgia official: we rechecked the machines, and they came out good. As a further back up, we manually HAND counted the results, and they matched up perfectly with the original count on the machines.
Trump: No, you are wrong. I know I am right.
What is the melt point of steel again at 1409 C and atmospheric pressure? 555
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Twitter Fascination:
Maybe you're the one who needs to realise that Twitter isn't real life?
I think it probably is for a lot of people.
We are lucky to have this place.
You can be a fool here without the family and friends watching.
I watch guys I know who are hooked on facebook.
It is pathetic.
They spend their lives arguing with anonymous 12-year-olds.
It's always the same stupid posts either for or against Mr. Trump.
-
@george-k said in The Twitter Fascination:
I follow twitter, but I don't engage. I think I've tweeted something twice to a retired surgeon whom I follow.
The good thing is that, despite the fact that it can turn into a sewer, it's become the de-facto place for breaking news. I have about 50 pages I look at, and half of them are news, and half are random stupid/funny shit.
Me too. I dont tweet. And no followers obviously. But I find it so fast on the draw, that if I wanted to know something long before it’s on regular outlets, I check Twitter.
Having said that I think half of my followees are legit sources of information and the other half are the ones at real fringes, just to see what people are capable of believing
Some of the ones I follow are: a true flat earth believer. A couple of Neo Nazis. Some trumpists that are so far out there, they make Larry and jolly seem like left wing progressives, and other odd sorts. Lots of anti Vaxxers and COVID deniers.
People are interesting. Strange and interesting.
-
@copper said in The Twitter Fascination:
You can be a fool here without the family and friends watching.
Presumably most or us here are at least in part alter-egos. I know I'm not really the same person here that I am in real life. In real life I'm a lot better looking and smarter. Hard to believe, I know.
Proud supporter of Plan 2525. Everything you think, do and say will be in the pill you took today.
-
I agree political twitter is a shit show.
But twitter is what you make it. What you see on your timeline depends on who you follow.
You can make it politics free. You can just follow a narrowly tailored list of people and have it be focused on (say) history or archeology or filmmaking or whatever your interest might be.
-
I don’t use it either. I only allow so many interruptions.
I turn off all notifications as well. I make sure I actively go to a place to be interrupted. This place too serves as a good curator of content.
Jon’s suggestion to me to stop watching CNN was one of the better pieces of advice I got in 2020. I stopped my NYT as well. It works almost as well as meditation.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Twitter Fascination:
In real life I'm a lot better looking and smarter.
I've met him, and this is fake news. SAD!
-
-
@89th said in The Twitter Fascination:
@doctor-phibes said in The Twitter Fascination:
In real life I'm a lot better looking and smarter.
I've met him, and this is fake news. SAD!
That was me sober. When I've had a few beers I'm like a cross between Brad Pitt and Stephen Hawking.
Well OK, I debate like Brad Pitt and I dance like Stephen Hawking, but still, it's a freaking start, OK???
