Does he really believe it?
-
I recall Russia's interference was about leveraging our racism narratives with fake facebook accounts, getting people all riled up. Now, who's responsible for America's infatuation with this racism narrative and its impunity against reliable facts and statistics?
@horace said in Does he really believe it?:
I recall Russia's interference was about leveraging our racism narratives with fake facebook accounts, getting people all riled up. Now, who's responsible for America's infatuation with this racism narrative and its impunity against reliable facts and statistics?
There’s an important distinction here.
If you’re having an argument within your family - one member may use argument X. Now if your neighbor starts mailing over envelopes containing “evidence” of argument X, then you tell the neighbor to fuck off.
-
Back to the broader point. When you start justifying bad actions of people today based on historical wrongs (let’s say Trump was wronged) - you end up in BLM territory.
-
@horace said in Does he really believe it?:
I recall Russia's interference was about leveraging our racism narratives with fake facebook accounts, getting people all riled up. Now, who's responsible for America's infatuation with this racism narrative and its impunity against reliable facts and statistics?
There’s an important distinction here.
If you’re having an argument within your family - one member may use argument X. Now if your neighbor starts mailing over envelopes containing “evidence” of argument X, then you tell the neighbor to fuck off.
@xenon said in Does he really believe it?:
@horace said in Does he really believe it?:
I recall Russia's interference was about leveraging our racism narratives with fake facebook accounts, getting people all riled up. Now, who's responsible for America's infatuation with this racism narrative and its impunity against reliable facts and statistics?
There’s an important distinction here.
If you’re having an argument within your family - one member may use argument X. Now if your neighbor starts mailing over envelopes containing “evidence” of argument X, then you tell the neighbor to fuck off.
The most important point is that both sides behaved really badly and nullify themselves. It’s two children fighting both of whom just need to go to their room until they can behave. TDS saying God is on their side is just bullshit.
-
Back to the broader point. When you start justifying bad actions of people today based on historical wrongs (let’s say Trump was wronged) - you end up in BLM territory.
@xenon said in Does he really believe it?:
Back to the broader point. When you start justifying bad actions of people today based on historical wrongs (let’s say Trump was wronged) - you end up in BLM territory.
This.
-
@jolly said in Does he really believe it?:
Nope, anybody that rubbed their hands in glee at Russia! Russia! Russia, while knowing there was nothing to it, is nothing more than a partisan hack.
In fact, they are worse than a partisan hack. These people have allowed hate for the individual to be placed ahead of the rule of law and what is best for the country. At this point, I would never trust them to do what is honorable or right, not if it meant furthering a political agenda...
Russia Russia Russia was Hillary’s playbook from the beginning. Some hack was hired to write a fake dossier and that became the overriding obsession for this country for four years. And now suddenly our country is threatened. Jesus.
But China, nothing to see here.
@loki said in Does he really believe it?:
Russia Russia Russia was Hillary’s playbook from the beginning. Some hack was hired to write a fake dossier and that became the overriding obsession for this country for four years.
Actually the dossier has become overriding obsession of right wing websites over the past 3 years or so.
You seem to fall into the trap, almost ubiquitous on the right, of confusing the dossier with the Russia investigation itself. You really should at least skim the executive summary of Meuller’s report.
You were warned.
-
@jon-nyc said in Does he really believe it?:
@loki said in Does he really believe it?:
Russia Russia Russia was Hillary’s playbook from the beginning. Some hack was hired to write a fake dossier and that became the overriding obsession for this country for four years.
Actually the dossier has become overriding obsession of right wing websites over the past 3 years or so.
You seem to fall into the trap, almost ubiquitous on the right, of confusing the dossier with the Russia investigation itself. You really should at least skim the executive summary of Meuller’s report.
Jon, do you honestly not know any better than that? Good grief guy.
-
Back to the broader point. When you start justifying bad actions of people today based on historical wrongs (let’s say Trump was wronged) - you end up in BLM territory.
-
@loki said in Does he really believe it?:
Russia Russia Russia was Hillary’s playbook from the beginning. Some hack was hired to write a fake dossier and that became the overriding obsession for this country for four years.
Actually the dossier has become overriding obsession of right wing websites over the past 3 years or so.
You seem to fall into the trap, almost ubiquitous on the right, of confusing the dossier with the Russia investigation itself. You really should at least skim the executive summary of Meuller’s report.
@jon-nyc said in Does he really believe it?:
@loki said in Does he really believe it?:
Russia Russia Russia was Hillary’s playbook from the beginning. Some hack was hired to write a fake dossier and that became the overriding obsession for this country for four years.
Actually the dossier has become overriding obsession of right wing websites over the past 3 years or so.
You seem to fall into the trap, almost ubiquitous on the right, of confusing the dossier with the Russia investigation itself. You really should at least skim the executive summary of Meuller’s report.
Yeah it's ubiquitous on the right. Sorry, only almost. It's only almost ubiquitous on the right. That's how you can tell the truth tellers. It's ubiquitous. But only almost.
-
@jon-nyc said in Does he really believe it?:
@loki said in Does he really believe it?:
Russia Russia Russia was Hillary’s playbook from the beginning. Some hack was hired to write a fake dossier and that became the overriding obsession for this country for four years.
Actually the dossier has become overriding obsession of right wing websites over the past 3 years or so.
You seem to fall into the trap, almost ubiquitous on the right, of confusing the dossier with the Russia investigation itself. You really should at least skim the executive summary of Meuller’s report.
Jon, do you honestly not know any better than that? Good grief guy.
@larry said in Does he really believe it?:
@jon-nyc said in Does he really believe it?:
@loki said in Does he really believe it?:
Russia Russia Russia was Hillary’s playbook from the beginning. Some hack was hired to write a fake dossier and that became the overriding obsession for this country for four years.
Actually the dossier has become overriding obsession of right wing websites over the past 3 years or so.
You seem to fall into the trap, almost ubiquitous on the right, of confusing the dossier with the Russia investigation itself. You really should at least skim the executive summary of Meuller’s report.
Jon, do you honestly not know any better than that? Good grief guy.
He does. He doesn't care.
