No asymptomatic spread?

[Renauda]

@jolly I'm sure you'll be fine so so long as I take the time to longe you around the arena for a few minutes beforehand.

[xenon]

The results in the study are a bit surprising. That said - the study isn’t about looking at asymptomatic spread and is rather more about the effectiveness of mass lockdowns.

[Rainman]

This is a fascinating thread. I didn't read any of the links, but following the conversation and arguments reveals so much about individual personalities, and how these are manifested in posts.

Maybe I'll take the time to click the links.

I wonder whether "asymptomatic" means breathing normally, where "symptomatic" specifically includes coughing, sneezing. It would seem obvious that coughing and sneezing would spread the virus much more than normal breathing, but is that specified in the data?

I think I will click the links and read. Nothing else to do. Probably stupid questions.

[Renauda]

@jolly said in No asymptomatic spread?:

As for the Lifesite website, it is admittedly biased, unlike the NYT, which claims it is not. I'll take admittedly biased, anyday. I like the site and will continue to link articles when I wish. As always, folks here are free to comment and discuss. I also find that sites like these also cover some things that do get ignored by MSM. Consider this:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fda-investigates-allergic-reactions-to-pfizer-covid-vaccine-after-more-healthcare-workers-hospitalized
They may be wrong in their theory that PEG caused the problem, but the problem exists. I told you about it here, before the MSM had a single story.

MSM in Canada have been regularly reporting about potential and actual vaccine reactions since at least December 12 following warnings from Health Canada to that effect. Being that your site is based in Canada, I suspect it's just trying to stay as relevant as its slightly godless and listless centrist and wholly godless and lifeless leftist competitors to which I consult for my information.