Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. $2000, not $600

$2000, not $600

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
21 Posts 11 Posters 230 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Mik

    $1400 more debt per taxpayer, that is not targeted. At all.

    In March/April there was some excuse for it. We didn't know what to expect and we had to do something fast. But now we have had 10 months to develop a better, more focused approach and our elected officials failed us miserably. Again.

    89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @mik said in $2000, not $600:

    $1400 more debt per taxpayer, that is not targeted. At all.

    Oh it’s targeted. Towards the 50% of households that qualify based on income level. In other words, half the country doesn’t get a check, even though they pay taxes...actually more in taxes (based on % of income).

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      This is ridiculous. I’d be willing to bet that a helluva lot of people in this income bracket haven’t missed a paycheck during COVID. On top of that, their overall costs are drastically lower. They are in better financial shape than they were before.

      The Brad

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        Agreed. I’d even be fine with a rough and imperfect system where you can apply online and “digitally sign” (under penalty of perjury) that you’ve lost substantial income and/or cannot pay rent or utility/food bills. Then you immediately get a check sent to you. Would at least have a little logic behind it since I think we’re behind the “flood the market with cash!” days in the spring.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • CopperC Offline
          CopperC Offline
          Copper
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          $600 is better than $2000

          $0 is better than $600

          AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
          • CopperC Copper

            $600 is better than $2000

            $0 is better than $600

            AxtremusA Away
            AxtremusA Away
            Axtremus
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            @copper said in $2000, not $600:

            $600 is better than $2000

            $0 is better than $600

            How about -$600 or -$2000?

            Say, because your expenses have gone down because you have no where to spend your money, so you send $600 or $2000 to the United States Treasury to pay down the national debt (and only to pay down the national debt).

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              It’s already a negative number. It’s debt.

              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                So it passed the house with bipartisan support.

                Bernie said he’ll filibuster the Defense Authorization Act vote (veto-override really) unless McConnell agrees to bring it up to a vote.

                You were warned.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  Whatever... It would be nice to be altruistic and put the funds back into struggling businesses, but it’s Lucas and Finley that will need to help pay this back, so it will all go into a 529 for Finley and an IRA for Luke.

                  The Brad

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • X Offline
                    X Offline
                    xenon
                    wrote on last edited by xenon
                    #20

                    Why stop at $2000? Go for broke, $10k per American!

                    I’m surprised the Dems aren’t egging him on.

                    Also - he’s BFFs with socialist Bernie now. This is what I meant by shamelessness. No need to make any semblance of sense.

                    He seems to only exist in the moment. Like the lead from Momento.

                    Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
                    • X xenon

                      Why stop at $2000? Go for broke, $10k per American!

                      I’m surprised the Dems aren’t egging him on.

                      Also - he’s BFFs with socialist Bernie now. This is what I meant by shamelessness. No need to make any semblance of sense.

                      He seems to only exist in the moment. Like the lead from Momento.

                      Aqua LetiferA Offline
                      Aqua LetiferA Offline
                      Aqua Letifer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      @xenon said in $2000, not $600:

                      Like the lead from Momento.

                      Not at all. Lenny knew he had a condition.

                      Please love yourself.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups