What's in the omnibus "relief bill?"
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2020, 12:22 last edited by George K
I don't know how much of this is the so-called "relief bill" and how much is in the rest of the 5000-plus pages of the bill:
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2020, 12:47 last edited by
The Covid relief bill includes funding to discourage teenagers from drinking and hooking up
Time for a tax protest. I refuse to participate, however indirectly, in a government-sponsored cock block.
-
The Covid relief bill includes funding to discourage teenagers from drinking and hooking up
Time for a tax protest. I refuse to participate, however indirectly, in a government-sponsored cock block.
wrote on 22 Dec 2020, 13:39 last edited by@jon-nyc said in What's in the omnibus "relief bill?":
The Covid relief bill includes funding to discourage teenagers from drinking and hooking up
Time for a tax protest. I refuse to participate, however indirectly, in a government-sponsored cock block.
Until you’re vaccinated, drinking and hooking up represent substantial virus transmission risks.
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2020, 13:53 last edited by
A risk any self-respecting teenage boy would take.
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2020, 14:38 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in What's in the omnibus "relief bill?":
A risk any self-respecting teenage boy would take.
About once or twice a year, we'd have a patient come to the OR for one of these procedures.
Standard line during rounds was, "I don't know why she's coming to the OR, this is nothing a self-respecting teenage boy couldn't accomplish."
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2020, 15:41 last edited by
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2020, 15:54 last edited by
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2020, 17:44 last edited by
-
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 01:08 last edited by
Tucker is saying that there's $500 million for border security...
...in Lebanon.
Because borders matter.
There's allocation for the "Women's History Museum" at the Smithsonian.
Oh, and getting women into the Pakistani army.
COVID relief, FTW!
We probably do get the government we deserve.
-
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 01:28 last edited by
I'm so sick of this shit.
-
Tucker is saying that there's $500 million for border security...
...in Lebanon.
Because borders matter.
There's allocation for the "Women's History Museum" at the Smithsonian.
Oh, and getting women into the Pakistani army.
COVID relief, FTW!
We probably do get the government we deserve.
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 01:58 last edited by@george-k said in What's in the omnibus "relief bill?":
Tucker is saying that there's $500 million for border security...
...in Lebanon.
Because borders matter.
There's allocation for the "Women's History Museum" at the Smithsonian.
Oh, and getting women into the Pakistani army.
COVID relief, FTW!
We probably do get the government we deserve.
That was the one that got to me. These sacks of shit go around yelling "no border wall! Walls don't work!" But the very same fools turn right around and give Lebanon half a billion of our tax dollars because they need a border wall.
It's not just democrats. Both parties are being led by fools. Then you factor in the simple minded sheep like Ax who tries to blame it on Trump... we need to fire all of them and start over.
-
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 12:17 last edited by
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-trump-idUSKBN28X01V
"WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump threatened on Tuesday to not sign an $892 billion coronavirus relief bill that includes desperately needed money for individual Americans, saying it should be amended to increase the amount in the stimulus checks."
Trump threatens not to sign the bill to hold out for bigger ($2000) stimulus check. Not sure if he's serious or just throwing a temper tantrum for show. He has not use the word "veto."
-
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 12:54 last edited by
Let's get that desperately needed $600 moving.
-
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 13:48 last edited by
-
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 13:56 last edited by
I'm actually cool with Trump's threat to veto this. Not that I would suggest a flat cash check, but if you really wanted to spend $900 billion, you could give every household earning less than $75,000 a check for $15,000. Not $600 + business help, state, foreign, pork, pork, pork.
BTW There are approximately 60 million households in the US (50% of households) earning less than $75k.
-
I'm actually cool with Trump's threat to veto this. Not that I would suggest a flat cash check, but if you really wanted to spend $900 billion, you could give every household earning less than $75,000 a check for $15,000. Not $600 + business help, state, foreign, pork, pork, pork.
BTW There are approximately 60 million households in the US (50% of households) earning less than $75k.
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 14:14 last edited byWhat percent of the bill is non Covid related and how different is that than most of these kinds of bills?
I can’t begin to know how to think about the bill without proper context.
-
What percent of the bill is non Covid related and how different is that than most of these kinds of bills?
I can’t begin to know how to think about the bill without proper context.
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 14:34 last edited by@loki This article has a good breakdown:
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/20/details-stimulus-package-omnibus-bill-449499
-
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 14:43 last edited by
@axtremus said in What's in the omnibus "relief bill?":
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-trump-idUSKBN28X01V
...
Trump threatens not to sign the bill to hold out for bigger ($2000) stimulus check.
Trump urges Congress to amend 'wasteful' coronavirus aid bill
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55420366The BBC reports more on Trump’s complains about the various “wasteful” aspects of the bill. Of course, Trump could have made all these complains, along with his stated desire to send bigger stimulus checks to individuals, back when Congress were busy negotiating the bill. Instead, Trump put his energy into stupid election lawsuits and conspiracy theories about election fraud.
Also of note is that Pelosi also supports sending bigger stimulus checks to individuals. The Democrats had many times passed much larger stimulus bills in the House before this one.
-
@axtremus said in What's in the omnibus "relief bill?":
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-trump-idUSKBN28X01V
...
Trump threatens not to sign the bill to hold out for bigger ($2000) stimulus check.
Trump urges Congress to amend 'wasteful' coronavirus aid bill
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55420366The BBC reports more on Trump’s complains about the various “wasteful” aspects of the bill. Of course, Trump could have made all these complains, along with his stated desire to send bigger stimulus checks to individuals, back when Congress were busy negotiating the bill. Instead, Trump put his energy into stupid election lawsuits and conspiracy theories about election fraud.
Also of note is that Pelosi also supports sending bigger stimulus checks to individuals. The Democrats had many times passed much larger stimulus bills in the House before this one.
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 14:50 last edited byI guess Trump has succeeded in getting democrats to defend the bill. LOL
-
wrote on 23 Dec 2020, 14:52 last edited by
@loki said in What's in the omnibus "relief bill?":
I guess Trump has succeeded in getting democrats to defend the bill. LOL
The Democratic controlled House of Representatives passed the bill. Already they had to defend it just because of that.
