That's right bitch. So quit trying.
-
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 00:36 last edited by
Might as well go down fighting!
Sic 'em, Trump!
-
He’s keeping enthusiasm alive for the Georgia elections, so moronic doesn’t exactly capture the tweet.
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 00:44 last edited by@loki said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
He’s keeping enthusiasm alive for the Georgia elections, so moronic doesn’t exactly capture the tweet.
Oh? It’s for campaigning purposes? Well, then how about he take a steaming dump on the picture of the opponent? That’ll juice up some enthusiasm.
Nothing is moronic in pursuit of the Georgia run-off victory.
-
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 00:46 last edited by@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
I’m not cool with it all. I am just pointing out that there is a motive and it’s not simply moronic.
-
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
I’m not cool with it all. I am just pointing out that there is a motive and it’s not simply moronic.
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 00:52 last edited by xenon@loki said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
I’m not cool with it all. I am just pointing out that there is a motive and it’s not simply moronic.
I get you, but it can have a motive and still be moronic.
And what you’re suggesting is worse than being moronic. He’s then calling cheat as a campaigning tool. I don’t think he’s that sinister. But who knows what he actually thinks.
-
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 00:57 last edited by
He believes he was cheated. I suspect 50,000,000 Americans agree with him.
-
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 01:02 last edited by xenon
@jolly said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
He believes he was cheated. I suspect 50,000,000 Americans agree with him.
So? We live in a society of laws not feels. He also happens to be the chief executive over the nation’s laws.
Once we start acting on beliefs rather than law - the country becomes something else.
-
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 01:10 last edited by
@jolly said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
He believes he was cheated. I suspect 50,000,000 Americans agree with him.
No, he's just irate because his friend Vladimir Putin congratulated Biden instead of him.
He feels quite entitled you know. Being the big bourgeois he is.
-
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 02:29 last edited by
What will these TDS loons do now?
Will they continue coming here screaming at us and shouting insults about Mr. Trump?
Probably, yes, I think they will.
The insults are really kind of weak, it might be more fun if they gave them a little more thought.
-
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 03:04 last edited by Larry@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
It would really really help in these discussions if you and Jon would take some time to educate yourself on the facts.
They HAVE backed up their claims with evidence. LOTS AND LOTS of evidence. But what good is evidence if no one will listen to it, the media covers it up, and low information sheep continually bleat about "back it up with evidence" but if your widdle ears hear any of it you mock it and shove your head in the ground?
-
What will these TDS loons do now?
Will they continue coming here screaming at us and shouting insults about Mr. Trump?
Probably, yes, I think they will.
The insults are really kind of weak, it might be more fun if they gave them a little more thought.
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 03:11 last edited by@copper said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
The insults are really kind of weak, it might be more fun if they gave them a little more thought.
Mr. Pot, I'd like to introduce you to Mr. Kettle.
-
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
It would really really help in these discussions if you and Jon would take some time to educate yourself on the facts.
They HAVE backed up their claims with evidence. LOTS AND LOTS of evidence. But what good is evidence if no one will listen to it, the media covers it up, and low information sheep continually bleat about "back it up with evidence" but if your widdle ears hear any of it you mock it and shove your head in the ground?
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 04:50 last edited by@larry said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
It would really really help in these discussions if you and Jon would take some time to educate yourself on the facts.
They HAVE backed up their claims with evidence. LOTS AND LOTS of evidence. But what good is evidence if no one will listen to it, the media covers it up, and low information sheep continually bleat about "back it up with evidence" but if your widdle ears hear any of it you mock it and shove your head in the ground?
Right. The Supreme Court and the various state judges have their heads up their asses. But Trump and his legal krakens are the ones seeing straight.
-
@larry said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
It would really really help in these discussions if you and Jon would take some time to educate yourself on the facts.
They HAVE backed up their claims with evidence. LOTS AND LOTS of evidence. But what good is evidence if no one will listen to it, the media covers it up, and low information sheep continually bleat about "back it up with evidence" but if your widdle ears hear any of it you mock it and shove your head in the ground?
Right. The Supreme Court and the various state judges have their heads up their asses. But Trump and his legal krakens are the ones seeing straight.
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 05:32 last edited by@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@larry said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
It would really really help in these discussions if you and Jon would take some time to educate yourself on the facts.
They HAVE backed up their claims with evidence. LOTS AND LOTS of evidence. But what good is evidence if no one will listen to it, the media covers it up, and low information sheep continually bleat about "back it up with evidence" but if your widdle ears hear any of it you mock it and shove your head in the ground?
Right. The Supreme Court and the various state judges have their heads up their asses. But Trump and his legal krakens are the ones seeing straight.
The supreme court refused to look at the evidence, the state judges refused to look at the evidence. You said Trumps team couldn't back anything up with evidence. I said they have lots of evidence. Refusing to look at the evidence does not mean there's no evidence to look at. So like I said... I really wish you would take the time to educate yourself. If you won't do that, at least learn how to follow logic.
-
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@larry said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
It would really really help in these discussions if you and Jon would take some time to educate yourself on the facts.
They HAVE backed up their claims with evidence. LOTS AND LOTS of evidence. But what good is evidence if no one will listen to it, the media covers it up, and low information sheep continually bleat about "back it up with evidence" but if your widdle ears hear any of it you mock it and shove your head in the ground?
Right. The Supreme Court and the various state judges have their heads up their asses. But Trump and his legal krakens are the ones seeing straight.
The supreme court refused to look at the evidence, the state judges refused to look at the evidence. You said Trumps team couldn't back anything up with evidence. I said they have lots of evidence. Refusing to look at the evidence does not mean there's no evidence to look at. So like I said... I really wish you would take the time to educate yourself. If you won't do that, at least learn how to follow logic.
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 05:45 last edited by xenon@larry said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@larry said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@xenon said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@jolly so you’re cool with President’s now kicking and screaming when they lose - with claims they can’t back up with evidence?
That’s the preferable way to do this?
It would really really help in these discussions if you and Jon would take some time to educate yourself on the facts.
They HAVE backed up their claims with evidence. LOTS AND LOTS of evidence. But what good is evidence if no one will listen to it, the media covers it up, and low information sheep continually bleat about "back it up with evidence" but if your widdle ears hear any of it you mock it and shove your head in the ground?
Right. The Supreme Court and the various state judges have their heads up their asses. But Trump and his legal krakens are the ones seeing straight.
The supreme court refused to look at the evidence, the state judges refused to look at the evidence. You said Trumps team couldn't back anything up with evidence. I said they have lots of evidence. Refusing to look at the evidence does not mean there's no evidence to look at. So like I said... I really wish you would take the time to educate yourself. If you won't do that, at least learn how to follow logic.
Alito specifically said “I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief”
He'd hear it, and dismiss it. He didn't need to say the second part of the sentence.
Where they have pushed their case they've gotten rebuked. In one of their last cases when the judge did unexpectedly ask the Trump team to lay out their case - they just folded.
I have been following this and have listened to conspiracy theorists.
I'll ask you for the umpteenth time - who ran this cross state conspiracy? Was Joe involved in it?
What sort of organization is this - that simultaneously leaves no tangible evidence of fraud but makes it glaringly obvious that there was fraud, and also graciously came up with a split congress instead of giving it to the dems?
Oh plus they somehow recruited Republican governors and election officials to aid in their crimes.
-
He’s keeping enthusiasm alive for the Georgia elections, so moronic doesn’t exactly capture the tweet.
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 11:15 last edited by@loki said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
He’s keeping enthusiasm alive for the Georgia elections, so moronic doesn’t exactly capture the tweet.
Is this you on record saying he’ll stop this nonsense in January 5th?
-
@Larry As recently as Sunday, after the SCOTUS ruling, Trump was given standing and and opportunity to present evidence by a Trump appointed judge in Wisconsin.
You what Team Trump said?
Never mind.
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 12:13 last edited by@jon-nyc said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@Larry As recently as Sunday, after the SCOTUS ruling, Trump was given standing and and opportunity to present evidence by a Trump appointed judge in Wisconsin.
You what Team Trump said?
Never mind.
Why bother calling witnesses when anybody with an ounce of common sense can see the election was rigged?
-
@jon-nyc said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@Larry As recently as Sunday, after the SCOTUS ruling, Trump was given standing and and opportunity to present evidence by a Trump appointed judge in Wisconsin.
You what Team Trump said?
Never mind.
Why bother calling witnesses when anybody with an ounce of common sense can see the election was rigged?
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 12:57 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
Why bother calling witnesses when anybody with an ounce of common sense can see the election was rigged?
Indeed. It's a "fact". A fact with so much evidence that it is absurd to even ask for specific evidence that would be taken seriously by a court. It's more certain than gravity and even existence itself!
-
@loki said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
He’s keeping enthusiasm alive for the Georgia elections, so moronic doesn’t exactly capture the tweet.
Is this you on record saying he’ll stop this nonsense in January 5th?
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 13:22 last edited by@jon-nyc said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
@loki said in That's right bitch. So quit trying.:
He’s keeping enthusiasm alive for the Georgia elections, so moronic doesn’t exactly capture the tweet.
Is this you on record saying he’ll stop this nonsense in January 5th?
No but I will point out if his tweets cease to be of utilitarian value to others. Nothing worse than a useless curmudgeon, let’s say like a Krugman.
-
wrote on 18 Dec 2020, 13:53 last edited by
Boy, Jon an xenon, you guys have it all figured out, don't you?. No need to discuss it any further, youve got all the answers!!
I'll remind you of that in a couple more weeks...
